IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/sdsusp/6761.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Review and Analysis of International and Budgetary Considerations for the 2007 U.S. Farm Bill

Author

Listed:
  • Qasmi, Bashir A.
  • Van der Sluis, Evert

Abstract

We assess the extent to which national budget considerations, international trade negotiations, and domestic political deliberations affect the potential development of an omnibus farm bill, which may be signed into law in 2008. With no successful conclusion of the Doha Development Round of trade negotiations in sight, U.S. legislators appear unable to make politically unpopular decisions on domestic farm policy reform. However, the absence of an international trade agreement does not reduce the need for the U.S. to comply with previous agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Qasmi, Bashir A. & Van der Sluis, Evert, 2008. "Review and Analysis of International and Budgetary Considerations for the 2007 U.S. Farm Bill," Economics Staff Papers 6761, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:sdsusp:6761
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6761/files/sp080001.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6761?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westcott, Paul C. & Young, C. Edwin & Price, J. Michael, 2002. "The 2002 Farm Act: Provisions And Implications For Commodity Markets," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33745, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Vanzetti, David & Peters, Ralf, 2003. "Making Sense Of Agricultural Trade Policy Reform," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25858, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Kym Anderson (ed.), 2005. "The WTO and Agriculture," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, volume 0, number 3024.
    4. Cain, Zachary & Lovejoy, Stephen B., 2004. "History and Outlook for Farm Bill Conservation Programs," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1-6.
    5. Hufbauer, Gary & Pischedda, Costantino, 2007. "After Doha: Evolution or Revolution in the Trading System?," Commissioned Papers 7308, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qasmi, Bashir & Van der Sluis, Evert, 2008. "Review and Analysis of International and Budgetary Considerations for the 2007 U.S. Farm Bill," Staff Papers 080001, South Dakota State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Distributional Effects of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs: Accounting for Farm and Non-Farm Households," Conference papers 331120, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Patrick Westhoff & Marc Rosenbohm & Youngjune Kim & Benjamin Brown, 2022. "The sector‐level safety net provided by the current mix of farm programs," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1204-1221, September.
    4. Flanders, Archie & Smith, Nathan & Fonsah, Esendugue & McKissick, John C., 2009. "Simulation Analysis of Double-Cropping Vegetables and Field Crops," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2009, pages 1-10.
    5. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Williams, Gary W., 2006. "The Economic Effectiveness of the Cotton Checkoff Program," Reports 90753, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.
    6. Elanor Starmer & Aimee Witteman & Timothy A. Wise, "undated". "Feeding the Factory Farm: Implicit Subsidies to the Broiler Chicken Industry," GDAE Working Papers 06-03, GDAE, Tufts University.
    7. Johansson, Robert C. & Cooper, Joseph & Vasavada, Utpal, 2005. "Greener Acres or Greener Waters? Potential U.S. Impacts of Agricultural Trade Liberalization," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 42-53, April.
    8. Antimiani, Alessandro & Conforti, Piero & Salvatici, Luca, 2005. "Alternative Market Access Scenarios in the Agriculture Trade Negotiations of the Doha Round," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23.
    9. Johansson, Robert C. & Livingston, Michael J. & Westra, John V. & Guidry, Kurt M., 2006. "Simulating the U.S. Impacts of Alternative Asian Soybean Rust Treatment Regimes," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 1-12, April.
    10. Whitaker, James B. & Effland, Anne, 2009. "Income Stabilization Through Government Payments: How is Farm Household Consumption Affected?," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 36-48, April.
    11. Pagliacci, Francesco & Zavalloni, Matteo, 2024. "The political economy determinants of agrienvironmental funds in the European Rural Development Programmes," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 13(2), July.
    12. Anderson, Kym, 2004. "Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?," Working Papers 14574, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    13. Sweikert, Lily A. & Gigliotti, Larry M., 2019. "Evaluating the role of Farm Bill conservation program participation in conserving America’s grasslands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 392-399.
    14. Eickhout, B. & Meijl, H. van & Tabeau, A. & Zeijts, H. van, 2004. "Between Liberalization and Protection: Four Long-term Scenarios for Trade, Poverty and the Environment," Conference papers 331268, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Ahearn, Mary Clare & Collender, Robert N. & Diao, Xinshen & Harrington, David H. & Hoppe, Robert A. & Korb, Penelope J. & Makki, Shiva S. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Roberts, Michael J. & Roe, Terry L. , 2004. "Decoupled Payments In A Changing Policy Setting," Agricultural Economic Reports 33981, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Drouet, Laurent & Haurie, Alain & Labriet, Maryse & Thalmann, Philippe & Vielle, Marc & Viguier, Laurent, 2005. "A Coupled Bottom-Up / Top-Down Model for GHG: Abatement Scenarios in the Swiss Housing Sector," Conference papers 331346, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Diop, Ndiame & Beghin, John & Sewadeh, Mirvat, 2004. "Groundnut policies, global trade dynamics, and the impact of trade liberalization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3226, The World Bank.
    18. Abdulla, Majd, 2009. "The impact of ownership on Iowa land owners' decisions to adopt conservation practices," ISU General Staff Papers 200901010800001913, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Will Martin & Kym Anderson, 2006. "Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6889.
    20. Shogren, Jason F. & Dohlman, Erik & Chambers, William, 2003. "Behavioral Implications Of Counter-Cyclical Payments And Base Acreage Updating Under The 2002 Farm Act," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21937, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:sdsusp:6761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edsdsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.