IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332198.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Adding value to applied policy models: The case of the WTO and OECD support classification systems

Author

Listed:
  • Josling, Tim
  • Mittenzwei, Klaus

Abstract

Both the OECD and the WTO have accumulated systematic data on the magnitude of support going to farmers as a result of farm policies. The datasets are collected for different purposes but both give a detailed picture of the evolution of these policies. This paper extends recent work on the compatibility or otherwise of these two attempts at policy monitoring by considering the categorization of individual policy instruments in Norway, Switzerland, the US and the EU. The results show how the OECD data set, particularly with respect to the link between direct payments and production requirements, complements that of the WTO. Many payments classified as in the WTO Green Box require production, raising the possibility that they may not be in practice trade-neutral. Though the issue of correct notifications to the WTO is the province of lawyers the implications for modeling and policy analysis is of interest to economists. And the broader question of improving the consistency of the two datasets is of importance in the quest for transparency in the interpretation of changes in farm policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Josling, Tim & Mittenzwei, Klaus, 2012. "Adding value to applied policy models: The case of the WTO and OECD support classification systems," Conference papers 332198, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332198/files/5707.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alan Swinbank, 2008. "Potential WTO Challenges to the CAP†," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 445-456, December.
    2. Effland, Anne, 2011. "Classifying and Measuring Agricultural Support: Identifying Differences Between the WTO and OECD Systems," Economic Information Bulletin 291948, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swinbank, Alan, 2009. "EU Support for Biofuels and Bioenergy, Environmental Sustainability Criteria, and Trade Policy," Price Volatility and Beyond 320208, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD).
    2. Maria Espinosa & Kamel Louhichi & Angel Perni & Pavel Ciaian, 2020. "EU‐Wide Impacts of the 2013 CAP Direct Payments Reform: A Farm‐Level Analysis," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 42(4), pages 695-715, December.
    3. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    4. Nicola Galluzzo, 2021. "Estimation of the impact of CAP subsidies as environmental variables on Romanian farms," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    5. Mittenzwei, Klaus & Britz, Wolfgang & Wieck, Christine, 2012. "Studying the effects of domestic support provisions on global agricultural trade: WTO and OECD policy indicators in the CAPRI model," Conference papers 332212, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Boháčková, I., 2015. "Several Comments on Creation and Use of PSE Indicator within Measuring of Financial Transfers to Agricultural Producers," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(1), pages 1-11, March.
    7. Troy G. Schmitz & Christopher R. Giese & Clifford J. Shultz II, 2008. "Welfare Implications of EU Enlargement under the CAP," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 555-562, December.
    8. James Rude, 2008. "Production Effects of the European Union's Single Farm Payment," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 457-471, December.
    9. Galluzzo Nicola, 2020. "A Technical Efficiency Analysis of Financial Subsidies Allocated by the Cap in Romanian Farms Using Stochastic Frontier Analysis," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 12(4), pages 494-505, December.
    10. Díaz-Bonilla, Eugenio, 2017. "Food security stocks: Economic and operational issues:," IFPRI book chapters, in: Bouët, Antoine & Laborde Debucquet, David (ed.), Agriculture, development, and the global trading system: 2000– 2015, chapter 8, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Chatellier, Vincent, 2011. "Price volatility, market regulation and risk management: challenges for the future of the CAP," Working Papers 208110, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    12. Beckman, Jayson & Dyck, John & Heerman, Kari, 2017. "The Global Landscape of Agricultural Trade, 1995-2014," Economic Information Bulletin 265270, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    13. Thorsøe, Martin & Noe, Egon & Maye, Damian & Vigani, Mauro & Kirwan, James & Chiswell, Hannah & Grivins, Mikelis & Adamsone-Fiskovica, Anda & Tisenkopfs, Talis & Tsakalou, Emi & Aubert, Pierre-Marie &, 2020. "Responding to change: Farming system resilience in a liberalized and volatile European dairy market," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. MacDonald, Stephen & Gale, Fred & Hansen, James, 2015. "Cotton Policy in China," MPRA Paper 70863, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Díaz-Bonilla, Eugenio, 2014. "On food security stocks, peace clauses, and permanent solutions after Bali:," IFPRI discussion papers 1388, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Sachin Kumar Sharma & Paavni Mathur & Ahamed Ashiq Shajahan & Lakshmi Swathi Ganti & Alisha Goswami, 2024. "WTO negotiations and repurposing agriculture subsidies for a sustainable future," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 349-372, September.
    17. Robert Ackrill & Adrian Kay & Wyn Morgan, 2008. "The Common Agricultural Policy and Its Reform: The Problem of Reconciling Budget and Trade Concerns," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 56(4), pages 393-411, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.