IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regional and National Perspectives of China’s Integration into the WTO: A Computable General Equilibrium Inquiry

Author

Listed:
  • Diao, Xinshen
  • Robinson, Sherman
  • Somwaru, Agapi
  • Tuan, Francis

Abstract

China’s integration to the World Trade Organization (WTO) is already on its fast track. Understanding the complexity of China’s dynamic adjustment resulting from its membership in the WTO and the differential regional impacts within China is very important and poses crucial challenge in evaluating its impacts. In this study, we make an attempt to incorporate seven regional commodity-detailed models into a highly disaggregated China Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) framework. This framework has allowed us to evaluate the impacts of China’s integration into WTO at both national and regional levels and analyze the inter-linkages between China’s provincial agricultural markets. Using the framework and assumptions about factor mobility, we assess the impacts on China’s agricultural and non-agricultural sectors (regionally and nationally) by reduction of its trade policy distortions, such as tariffs rate changes and quantitative restrictions. We also evaluate the structural changes on China’s national and regional production and trade as China implements its commitments and moves into WTO.

Suggested Citation

  • Diao, Xinshen & Robinson, Sherman & Somwaru, Agapi & Tuan, Francis, 2002. "Regional and National Perspectives of China’s Integration into the WTO: A Computable General Equilibrium Inquiry," Conference papers 331002, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331002/files/345.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James, Sallie & Anderson, Kym, 1998. "On the need for more economic assessment of quarantine/SPS policies," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    2. Komen, M-H-C & Peerlings, J-H-M, 1996. "WAGEM : An Applied General Equilibrium Model for Agricultural and Environment Policy Analysis," Mansholt Working Papers 1996-04, Wageningen University, Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences.
    3. C. Arndt & H.T. Jensen & S. Robinson & F. Tarp, 2000. "Marketing Margins and Agricultural Technology in Mozambique," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 121-137, October.
    4. Dirk Pilat, 1997. "Regulation and Performance in the Distribution Sector," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 180, OECD Publishing.
    5. Geoffrey Reed, 2000. "Potential gains from reducing trade barriers in manufacturing, services and agriculture; commentary," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 77-104.
    6. Hertel, Thomas W. & Anderson, Kym & Francois, Joseph F. & Martin, Will, 2000. "Agriculture and Non-agricultural Liberalization in the Millennium Round," Working papers 283441, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Michael K. Wohlgenant, 1989. "Demand for Farm Output in a Complete System of Demand Functions," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(2), pages 241-252.
    8. Glenn W. Harrison & Thomas F. Rutherford & David G. Tarr, 2017. "Quantifying The Uruguay Round," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Trade Policies for Development and Transition, chapter 16, pages 363-388, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    9. M.H.C. Komen & J.H.M. Peerlings, 1996. "WAGEM: an applied general equilibrium model for agricultural and environmental policy analysis," Mansholt Working Papers 04-96, Wageningen University, Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences.
    10. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    11. Donald J. Rousslang & Theodore To, 1993. "Domestic Trade and Transportation Costs as Barriers to International Trade," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 26(1), pages 208-221, February.
    12. Perroni, Carlo & Rutherford, Thomas F., 1995. "Regular flexibility of nested CES functions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 335-343, February.
    13. Peterson, Everett B & Hertel, Thomas W & Preckel, Paul V, 1994. "A General Equilibrium Framework for the Food Marketing System," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 21(1), pages 37-57.
    14. Wohlgenant, Michael K. & Haidacher, Richard C., 1989. "Retail to farm linkage for a complete demand system of food commodities," Technical Bulletins 312312, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott Bradford & Alexandre Gohin, 2006. "Modeling Distribution Services and Assessing Their Welfare Effects in a General Equilibrium Framework," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 87-102, February.
    2. Thomas W. Hertel & Jeffrey J. Reimer, 2006. "Predicting the Poverty Impacts of Trade Reform," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 2, May.
    3. Alexandre Gohin & GianCarlo Moschini, 2006. "Evaluating the Market and Welfare Impacts of Agricultural Policies in Developed Countries: Comparison of Partial and General Equilibrium Measures," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 195-211.
    4. Allexandro Mori Coelho & Maria Lúcia L. M. Pádua Lima & Samir Cury & Sergio Goldbaum, 2006. "Impacts Of The Proposals For Tariff Reductions In Nonagricultural Goods (Nama)," Anais do XXXIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 34th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 121, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
    5. Brester, Gary W. & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 1990. "Effects of Measurement Error in Disappearance Data on Estimated Demand Elasticities for Keats," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271039, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Chen, Y.-H. Henry, 2015. "Economic Projection with Non-homothetic Preferences: The Performance and Application of a CDE Demand System," Conference papers 332611, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. John Gilbert, 2013. "The economic impact of new regional trading developments in the ESCAP region," Asia-Pacific Development Journal, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), vol. 20(1), pages 1-32, June.
    8. Dent, Siobahn K. & Piggott, Roley R. & O'Donnell, Christopher J. & Griffith, Garry R., 2003. "Does Excluding Cross-commodity Interactions Matter? Beef and Lamb in Australia," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57859, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    9. Alexandre Gohin & J.C. Bureau, 2005. "Sugar market liberalization : modeling the EU supply of "C" sugar," Post-Print hal-01937090, HAL.
    10. Thissen, Mark, 1998. "Two decades of CGE modelling lessons from models for Egypt," Research Report 99C02, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    11. Maskus, Keith E. & Wilson, John S. & Tsunehiro Otsuki, 2000. "Quantifying the impact of technical barriers to trade : a framework for analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2512, The World Bank.
    12. Youhong Lee & Qingxiao Li & Metin Çakır, 2023. "Elasticities of substitution between marketing and farm inputs in a complete system of food commodities," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1450-1471, September.
    13. Hansmire, Michelle R. & Willett, Lois Schertz, 1993. "Price Transmission Processes: A Study of Price Lags and Asymmetric Price Response Behavior for New York Red Delicious and McIntosh Apples," Research Bulletins 123011, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    14. Raphael A. Auer & Barthélémy Bonadio & Andrei A. Levchenko, 2020. "The Economics and Politics of Revoking NAFTA," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 68(1), pages 230-267, March.
    15. Alexandre Gohin, 2006. "The specification of price and income elasticities in computable general equilibrium models : an application of latent separability," Working Papers hal-01931657, HAL.
    16. Kym Anderson, 2016. "Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-46925-0, November.
    17. Anderson, Kym, 2000. "Agriculture, Developing Countries, And The WTO Millennium Round," CEPR Discussion Papers 2437, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 143-158, October.
    19. Kathuria, Sanjay & Martin, Will & Bhardwaj, Anjali, 2001. "Implications for South Asian countries for abolishing the Multifibre Arrangement," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2721, The World Bank.
    20. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2004. "Specification choice and robustness in CGE trade policy analysis with imperfect competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1065-1099, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.