IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi13/164765.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Networking Related to Sustainability in Hungary

Author

Listed:
  • Hegyi, Adrienn
  • Homolka, Fruzsina
  • Sebők, András

Abstract

Sustainability is arguably one of the greatest challenges to Hungary in the future. The question is how to meet this need and tackle this challenge that requires commitment from the different players of the supply chain. This aim of the work within the FP7 Salsa project was to detect, explore the importance of sustainability and categories of the sustainability by the actors of the network and identify those elements related to sustainability issues, which support the future success along the soya and beef supply chain. In Hungary majority of the soy and beef enterprises are classic SMEs. The topics was quite “hard” for the questioned SMEs, because in one hand it is an increasing needs for sustainability, but in the other hand the environmental concerns haven’t acquired as significant awareness in Hungary as in western countries within the European Union. The needs regarding sustainability can be identified mainly from farmers and wholesalers (particularly multinational companies)., but most of the cases significant activities or changes have not been made yet. The producers emphasized that they fulfill the sustainability requirement if it is a real needs from their customers or without risking their success of their businesses. The other frequently mentioned answer was that they dealt with the sustainable aspects if it supports the most efficient use of the natural resources or the better quality of the product. Sustainability was associated with costs. The participants all agree that the cost of sustainability can be fairly high. However there is a significant need for sustainable production and products in Hungary, they do everything to meet the requirements of the sustainability standards. But in that case the members of the supply chain can see clearly the profitability of their investment in sustainability. Based on the results we could conclude that there is a harmonized, good business relation between the stakeholders within the Hungarian soy and beef supply chains. The power relations are different within the soy and the beef chains. Within the beef supply chains the wholesalers make the rules, and in spite of this, within the soy supply chain the bargaining power depends on the size of the soy production per year and on the market trends. Finally we could conclude that there is a real need from the players of the supply chains for collaboration, because only with the collective changing will contribute to enhance sustainable development in Hungary.

Suggested Citation

  • Hegyi, Adrienn & Homolka, Fruzsina & Sebők, András, 2013. "Networking Related to Sustainability in Hungary," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164765, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi13:164765
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.164765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164765/files/35-Hegyi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.164765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Quariguasi Frota Neto, J. & Walther, G. & Bloemhof, J. & van Nunen, J.A.E.E. & Spengler, T., 2009. "A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(3), pages 670-682, March.
    2. Chaabane, A. & Ramudhin, A. & Paquet, M., 2012. "Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(1), pages 37-49.
    3. Lefebvre, Virginie M. & Molnar, Adrienn & Gellynck, Xavier, 2010. "Network performance - What influences it?," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95024, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aleksander Banasik & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2017. "Assessing alternative production options for eco-efficient food supply chains using multi-objective optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 250(2), pages 341-362, March.
    2. Dekker, Rommert & Bloemhof, Jacqueline & Mallidis, Ioannis, 2012. "Operations Research for green logistics – An overview of aspects, issues, contributions and challenges," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 671-679.
    3. Farnaz Barzinpour & Peyman Taki, 2018. "A dual-channel network design model in a green supply chain considering pricing and transportation mode choice," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(7), pages 1465-1483, October.
    4. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    5. Brandenburg, Marcus, 2017. "A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 58-76.
    6. Martí, Joana M. Comas & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien & Seifert, Ralf W., 2015. "Carbon footprint and responsiveness trade-offs in supply chain network design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 129-142.
    7. Soysal, Mehmet & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline.M. & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2012. "A Review on Quantitative Models for Sustainable Food Logistics Management," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 3(2), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    9. Palak, Gökçe & Ekşioğlu, Sandra Duni & Geunes, Joseph, 2014. "Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 198-216.
    10. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    11. Pishvaee, M.S. & Razmi, J. & Torabi, S.A., 2014. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 14-38.
    12. Banasik, Aleksander & Kanellopoulos, Argyris & Claassen, G.D.H. & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2017. "Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 409-420.
    13. Soysal, Mehmet & Bloemhof, Jacqueline M. & van der Vorst, Jack G.A.J., 2012. "A Review of Quantitative Models for Sustainable Food Logistics Management: Challenges and Issues," 2012 International European Forum, February 13-17, 2012, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 144974, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    14. Hongpeng Guo & Zhihao Lv & Junyi Hua & Hongxu Yuan & Qingyu Yu, 2021. "Design of Combined Auction Model for Emission Rights of International Forestry Carbon Sequestration and Other Pollutants Based on SMRA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-18, October.
    15. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    16. Shi, Yi & Deng, Yawen & Wang, Guoan & Xu, Jiuping, 2020. "Stackelberg equilibrium-based eco-economic approach for sustainable development of kitchen waste disposal with subsidy policy: A case study from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    18. Mallidis, Ioannis & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Iakovou, Eleftherios & Dekker, Rommert, 2014. "Design and planning for green global supply chains under periodic review replenishment policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 210-235.
    19. Timo Hilger & Florian Sahling & Horst Tempelmeier, 2016. "Capacitated dynamic production and remanufacturing planning under demand and return uncertainty," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(4), pages 849-876, October.
    20. Juanjuan Qin & Liguo Ren & Liangjie Xia, 2017. "Carbon Emission Reduction and Pricing Strategies of Supply Chain under Various Demand Forecasting Scenarios," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(01), pages 1-27, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Industrial Organization; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi13:164765. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.