IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/icar24/344968.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessment of Research Priorities for Livestock Sector in India

Author

Listed:
  • Birthal, Pratap S.
  • Joshi, P. K.
  • Kumar, Anjani

Abstract

In its continuing efforts to provide inputs to research planning, NCAP has taken up livestock sector for a detailed analysis. Livestock sector is a sunrise sector of Indian economy, and is expected to emerge as an engine of growth of the agricultural sector in the decades to come. Growing human population, sustained economic growth, changing lifestyles of the upwardly mobile middle class, and increasing urban population are driving rapid growth in demand for food of animal origin. However at the same time, productivity growth of livestock remains constricted owing to a number of factors, such as huge livestock population, inadequate feed and fodder supply, and poor adoption of technologies. Thus, it is increasingly felt that future growth has to be demand- and technology-driven. The importance of livestock sector goes beyond its food production function. It supplies draught power, organic manure and domestic fuel. Livestock is the lifeline of millions of landless, marginal and small landholders who own a sizeable proportion of livestock wealth. Since resources available are becoming scarcer to meet the challenges, it is critical to objectively evaluate livestock research priorities. This study provides an objective assessment of macro level research priorities for the livestock sector, in terms of regions, species and commodities. It covers all states and union territories, eight livestock species and their products and services. The study also gives a comprehensive picture of growth and contribution of livestock sector in the Indian economy and also the evolution of livestock research in India. The main findings of the study have been vetted by peers and also in meetings with experts, policymakers and officials of the Government. It is hoped that the study will guide research resource allocation in the livestock sector for its accelerated growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Birthal, Pratap S. & Joshi, P. K. & Kumar, Anjani, 2002. "Assessment of Research Priorities for Livestock Sector in India," Policy Papers 344968, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:icar24:344968
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344968/files/Assessment%20of%20Research%20Priorities%20for%20Livestock%20Sector%20in%20India.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344968?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gryseels, G. & de Wit, C. T. & McCalla, A. & Monyo, J. & Kassam, A. & Craswell, E. & Collinson, M., 1992. "Setting agricultural research priorities for the CGIAR," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 40(1-3), pages 59-103.
    2. George W. Norton & Jeffrey S. Davis, 1981. "Evaluating Returns to Agricultural Research: A Review," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(4), pages 685-699.
    3. Jha, Dayanatha, 2001. "Agricultural Research and Small Farms," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 56(1), March.
    4. Jha. Dayanatha & Kumar, Praduman & Mruthyunjaya & Pal, Suresh & Selvarajan, S. & Singh, Alka, 1995. "Research Priorities in Indian Agriculture," Policy Papers 344999, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    5. Lu, Yao-chi & Quance, Leroy & Liu, Chun-lan, 1978. "Projecting Agricultural Productivity And Its Economic Impact," 1978 Annual Meeting, August 6-9, Blacksburg, Virginia 283557, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Kumar, P. & Maji, C. C. & Patel, R. K., 1977. "Returns on Investment in Research and Extension: A Study on Indo-Swiss Cattle Improvement Project Kerala," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32(3), July.
    7. Norton, George W., 1987. "Priority Setting Methods for Agricultural Research: Recent Experience in the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, and Uruguay," ISNAR Archive 310784, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Alex F. McCalla & James G. Ryan, 1992. "Setting Agricultural Research Priorities: Lessons from the CGIAR Study," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1095-1100.
    9. Kelley, T. G. & Ryan, J. G. & Patel, B. K., 1995. "Applied participatory priority setting in international agricultural research: Making trade-offs transparent and explicit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 177-216.
    10. McCalla, Alex F. & Ryan, James G., 1992. "Setting Agricultural Research Priorities: Lessons from the CGIAR Study," 1992 Annual Meeting, August 9-12, Baltimore, Maryland 271388, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    11. George W. Norton & Philip G. Pardey & Julian M. Alston, 1992. "Economic Issues in Agricultural Research Priority Setting," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 74(5), pages 1089-1094.
    12. C. Richard Shumway, 1973. "Allocation of Scarce Resources to Agricultural Research: Review of Methodology," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 55(4_Part_1), pages 557-566.
    13. Gaddi, G. M. & Kunnal, L. B., 1996. "Sources of Output Growth in New Milk Production Technology and Some Implications to Returns on Research Investment," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 51(3), September.
    14. Yao-chi Lu & Leroy Quance & Chun-lan Liu, 1978. "Projecting Agricultural Productivity and Its Economic Impact," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(5), pages 976-980.
    15. Norton, George W. & Davis, Jeffrey S., 1979. "Review Of Methods Used To Evaluate Returns To Agricultural Research," Staff Papers 13520, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    16. Norton, George W. & Pardey, Philip G., 1987. "Priority-Setting Mechanisms for National Agricultural Research Systems: Present Experience and Future Needs," ISNAR Archive 310785, CGIAR > International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jha, Dayanatha & Kumar, Sant, 2006. "Research Resource Allocation in Indian Agriculture," Policy Papers 345000, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    2. Birthal, Pratap S. & Negi, Digvijay S. & Roy, Devesh, 2017. "Enhancing Farmers’ Income: Who to Target and How?," Policy Papers 344988, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jha. Dayanatha & Kumar, Praduman & Mruthyunjaya & Pal, Suresh & Selvarajan, S. & Singh, Alka, 1995. "Research Priorities in Indian Agriculture," Policy Papers 344999, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    2. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "The Production Function Approach to the Relationship Between Productivity Growth and R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232791, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    3. Kelley, T. G. & Ryan, J. G. & Patel, B. K., 1995. "Applied participatory priority setting in international agricultural research: Making trade-offs transparent and explicit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 177-216.
    4. Fuglie, Keith & Ballenger, Nicole & Rubenstein, Kelly Day & Klotz, Cassandra & Ollinger, Michael & Reilly, John & Vasavada, Utpal & Yee, Jet, 1996. "Agricultural Research and Development: Public and Private Investments Under Alternative Markets and Institutions," Agricultural Economic Reports 262031, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Pemsl, Diemuth E. & Staver, Charles & Hareau, Guy & Alene, Arega D. & Abdoulaye, Tahirou & Kleinwechter, Ulrich & Labarta, Ricardo & Thiele, Graham, 2022. "Prioritizing international agricultural research investments: lessons from a global multi-crop assessment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    6. Taing, William & Ahmadi-Esfahani, Fredoun Z., 2009. "GM technology and the Australian canola," 2009 Conference (53rd), February 11-13, 2009, Cairns, Australia 48191, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    7. Shujat Ali, 2005. "Total Factor Productivity Growth and Agricultural Research and Extension: An Analysis of Pakistan's Agriculture, 1960-1996," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 44(4), pages 729-746.
    8. Scobie, Grant M., 1984. "Investment in Agricultural Research: Some Economic Principles," Economics Working Papers 232447, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    9. Kathayat, Babita & Dixit, Anil K & Chandel, B S & Sendhil, R & Sharma, A K, 2022. "Economic impact of public research investment on livestock productivity: evidence from India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 35(Conferenc), December.
    10. Townsend, Rob F. & van Zyl, Johan, 1998. "Estimation of the rate of return to wine grape research and technology development expenditures in South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 37(2), pages 1-22, June.
    11. Ciarli, Tommaso & Ràfols, Ismael, 2019. "The relation between research priorities and societal demands: The case of rice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 949-967.
    12. Palatnik, Ruslana Rachel & Freer, Mikhail & Levin, Mark & Golberg, Alexander & Zilberman, David, 2023. "Algae-Based Two-Stage Supply Chain with Co-Products," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    13. McVey, Marty Jay, 1996. "Valuing quality differentiated grains from a total logistics perspective," ISU General Staff Papers 1996010108000012326, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    14. Midingoyi, Soul-kifouly & Hippolyte, Affognon & Georges, Ong'amo & Bruno, LeRu, 2015. "Economic Welfare Change Attributable to Biological Control of Lepidopteran Cereal Stemborer Pests in East and Southern Africa: Cases of Maize and Sorghum in Kenya, Mozambique and Zambia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 212461, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Araji, A. A. & Hafez, S., 2001. "The Economic And Environmental Impacts Of Investment In Agricultural Biotechnology Research," A.E. Research Series 305028, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    16. Aaron Michael Shew & Alvaro Durand‐Morat & Lawton Lanier Nalley & Karen Ann‐Kuenzel Moldenhauer, 2018. "Estimating the benefits of public plant breeding: beyond profits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 753-764, November.
    17. Nedumaran, S. & Bantilan, M.C.S. & Gupta, S.K. & Irshad, A. & Davis, J.S., 2015. "Potential Welfare Benefit of Millets Improvement Research to Inform Decision Making: Multi country- Economic Surplus model approach," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 230224, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Bradford F. Mills, 1998. "Ex Ante Research Evaluation and Regional Trade Flows: Maize in Kenya," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 393-408, September.
    19. A. C. Herruzo, 1992. "Producer Benefits From Technology Induced Supply Shifts In The Ec Cotton Regime," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(1), pages 56-63, January.
    20. David N. Bengston & H. Fred Kaiser, 1988. "Research Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Forest Service," Evaluation Review, , vol. 12(3), pages 276-290, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:icar24:344968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dapurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.