IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iafepa/235398.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Administrative and transaction-related costs of subsidising agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Kulawik, Jacek

Abstract

Administrative and transaction-related costs have a long-established position in economic sciences, including agricultural economics. Unfortunately, so far economists have not created a uniform methodology for defining, classifying, and measuring them. The direction that perhaps should be considered most promising when seeking advancements in this field is the Standard Cost Model (SCM) and its derivatives (e.g. ACM). However, it needs to be supplemented with tools from the area of new public management that is Public Value, CAF, or the ISO 9001 standards. As regards financial interventionism, administrative and transaction- -related costs first made their appearance in the area of credit subsidies. It was much later that the research focused on the evaluation of the overall “tool kit” of financial and budgetary policy in agriculture. It has been conducted, however, on the basis of different methodologies which hampers the comparison of the produced results. Also, the test samples were often too small to be used in the more advanced quantitative analyses.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulawik, Jacek, 2014. "Administrative and transaction-related costs of subsidising agriculture," Problems of Agricultural Economics / Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 235398, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iafepa:235398
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235398/files/Kulawik.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235398?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mann, S., 2009. "Zur Wirkungsweise eines outputorientierten Agrarumweltprogramms," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44, March.
    2. Katherine Falconer & Pierre Dupraz & Martin Whitby, 2001. "An Investigation of Policy Administrative Costs Using Panel Data for the English Environmentally Sensitive Areas," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 83-103, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galler, Carolin, 2015. "Koordinationsbedarf in der Umweltplanung zur Optimierung multifunktionaler Maßnahmeneffekte," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Karl, Helmut (ed.), Koordination raumwirksamer Politik: Mehr Effizienz und Wirksamkeit von Politik durch abgestimmte Arbeitsteilung, volume 4, pages 152-173, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    2. Jongeneel, Roelof A. & Polman, Nico B.P. & Slangen, Louis H.G., 2008. "Cost-Benefit Analysis Of The Dutch Nature Conservation Policy: Direct, Indirect Effects And Transaction Costs Of The Ecological Main Structure In The Netherlands," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43970, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Bazzani, Guido Maria & Viaggi, Davide, 2004. "Improving the design of agri-environmental policies: a case study in Italy," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 5(2), pages 1-15, August.
    4. François Bareille & Matteo Zavalloni, 2020. "Decentralisation of agri-environmental policy design," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(4), pages 1502-1530.
    5. Peerlings, Jack H.M. & Polman, Nico B.P., 2005. "Plant Species Protection Contracts: Modelling Contract Choice for Specialised Dairy Farms and Mixed Dairy Pig Fattening Farms in the Netherlands," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24728, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. David Meintrup & Chang Woon Nam, 2009. "Shadow Market Area for Air Pollutants," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(4), pages 664-681, August.
    7. Pierre Dupraz & Karine Latouche & Francois Bonnieux, 2004. "Economic implications of scale and threshold effects in agri-environmental processes," Post-Print hal-01931556, HAL.
    8. Uthes, Sandra & Sattler, Claudia & Zander, Peter & Piorr, Annette & Matzdorf, Bettina & Damgaard, Martin & Sahrbacher, Amanda & Schuler, Johannes & Kjeldsen, Chris & Heinrich, Uwe & Fischer, Holger, 2010. "Modeling a farm population to estimate on-farm compliance costs and environmental effects of a grassland extensification scheme at the regional scale," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 282-293, June.
    9. Christine Léger Léger-Bosch, 2019. "Farmland tenure and transaction costs: Public and collectively owned land vs conventional coordination mechanisms in France [Régime de tenure foncière et coûts de transaction: terres publiques et c," Post-Print hal-02573765, HAL.
    10. Coggan, Anthea & Whitten, Stuart M. & Bennett, Jeff, 2010. "Influences of transaction costs in environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1777-1784, July.
    11. Laure Latruffe & . Hampshire, 2004. "Investment and financial constraints of Polish farmers," Post-Print hal-02283463, HAL.
    12. Valentová, Michaela & Horák, Martin & Dvořáček, Lukáš, 2020. "Why transaction costs do not decrease over time? A case study of energy efficiency programmes in Czechia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Marcello De Rosa & Luca Bartoli & Teresa Del Giudice & Yari Vecchio, 2022. "Conducive Environments and Entrepreneurial Access to Rural Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    14. Coggan, Anthea & Buitelaar, Edwin & Whitten, Stuart & Bennett, Jeff, 2013. "Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 222-231.
    15. Yann Desjeux & Pierre Dupraz & Francois Bonnieux & David Baldock & Laura Kröger & John Finn & Davide Viaggi & Volker Beckmann & . Itaes Project, 2006. "ITAES Workshop, Brussels September 13th 2005, Proceedings," Post-Print hal-02818880, HAL.
    16. Marie-José Smits & Peter Driessen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "Governing Agri-Environmental Schemes: Lessons to Be Learned from the New Institutional-Economics Approach," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 26(3), pages 627-643, June.
    17. Takumi Sakuyama, 2006. "Direct Payments for Environmental Services from Mountain Agriculture in Japan: Evaluating its Effectiveness and Drawing Lessons for Developing Countries," The Electronic Journal of Agricultural and Development Economics, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, vol. 3(1), pages 27-57.
    18. Pierre Dupraz & Karine Latouche & Nadine Turpin, 2007. "Programmes agri-environnementaux en présence d’effets de seuil," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 82, pages 5-32.
    19. Pierre Dupraz & Michel Pech & Pierre Rainelli, 2003. "Are the French CTEs (farming territorial contracts) an efficiency policy tool ?," Post-Print hal-01931660, HAL.
    20. Stephen Hynes & Brian Cahill & Emma J. Dillon & Thia Hennessy & Eoghan Garvey, 2007. "A Panel Data Random Effects Model of Agri-Environment Programme Participation," Working Papers 0708, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iafepa:235398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ierigpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.