IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae15/211381.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Environmental Fiscal Food Policy: A French Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Caillavet, F.
  • Fadhuile, A.
  • Nichele, V.

Abstract

The global food system is estimated to contribute to 30% of total Greenhouse gas emissions. The issue of how to incentivize consumers modifying their diet is crucial. We consider here food taxation scenarios aiming at reducing environmental emissions through different CO2tax options. Data proceed from Kantar purchases for food-at-home of French households on the 1998-2010 period. Our main result is that a uniform tax scenario, set at a 20% rate, induces a greater emissions reduction than a proportional to emissions tax scenario, based on a 50€/tCO2 carbon cost. Therefore a 20% tax scenario on targeted foods could result in a better incentive to consumer choices in an environmental perspective. Moreover, the implementation of a VAT increase is probably easier than any other tax regulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Caillavet, F. & Fadhuile, A. & Nichele, V., 2015. "An Environmental Fiscal Food Policy: A French Perspective," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211381, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211381
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.211381
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/211381/files/Caillavet-An%20Environmental%20Fiscal%20Food%20Policy-472.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.211381?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen Zhen & Eric A. Finkelstein & James M. Nonnemaker & Shawn A. Karns & Jessica E. Todd, 2014. "Predicting the Effects of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes on Food and Beverage Demand in a Large Demand System," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(1), pages 1-25.
    2. Edjabou, Louise Dyhr & Smed, Sinne, 2013. "The effect of using consumption taxes on foods to promote climate friendly diets – The case of Denmark," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 84-96.
    3. Peter Scarborough & Paul Appleby & Anja Mizdrak & Adam Briggs & Ruth Travis & Kathryn Bradbury & Timothy Key, 2014. "Dietary greenhouse gas emissions of meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 179-192, July.
    4. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adelaide & Nichèle, Véronique, 2014. "Taxing animal foods for sustainability: environmental, nutritional and social perspectives in France," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182863, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caillavet, F. & Fadhuile, A. & Nichèle, V., 2015. "An Environmental Fiscal Food Policy: Uniform vs. Proportional Tax Rate," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202738, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adelaide & Nichèle, Véronique, 2016. "Hunger for meat: can animal protein-based taxation reverse the trend?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235982, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Ariane Kehlbacher & Richard Tiffin & Adam Briggs & Mike Berners-Lee & Peter Scarborough, 2016. "The distributional and nutritional impacts and mitigation potential of emission-based food taxes in the UK," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 121-141, July.
    4. Caillavet, F. & Fadhuile, A. & Nichele, V., 2018. "Distributional effects of emission-based carbon taxes on food: the case of France," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277102, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Brian J. Revell, 2015. "One Man's Meat … 2050? Ruminations on Future Meat Demand in the Context of Global Warming," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 573-614, September.
    6. Torbjörn Jansson & Sarah Säll, 2018. "Environmental Consumption Taxes On Animal Food Products To Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions From The European Union," Climate Change Economics (CCE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Allais, Olivier & Etilé, Fabrice & Lecocq, Sébastien, 2015. "Mandatory labels, taxes and market forces: An empirical evaluation of fat policies," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 27-44.
    8. Yu Chen & Chen Zhen, 2022. "The potential impact of reducing sodium in packaged food: The case of the Chinese instant noodles market," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(1), pages 3-20, January.
    9. Caillavet, France & Fadhuile, Adélaïde & Nichèle, Véronique, 2019. "Assessing the distributional effects of carbon taxes on food: Inequalities and nutritional insights in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 20-31.
    10. Clare, Kathryn & Maani, Nason & Milner, James, 2022. "Meat, money and messaging: How the environmental and health harms of red and processed meat consumption are framed by the meat industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Jakina Debnam, 2017. "Selection Effects and Heterogeneous Demand Responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax Vote," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1172-1187.
    12. Bonnet, Céline & Réquillart, Vincent, 2023. "The effects of taxation on the individual consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    13. Zarko Kalamov, 2020. "A sales tax is better at promoting healthy diets than the fat tax and the thin subsidy," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 353-366, March.
    14. Allan, Grant & Comerford, David & McGregor, Peter, 2019. "The system-wide impact of healthy eating: Assessing emissions and economic impacts at the regional level," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Carpio, Carlos E., 2017. "Budget Allocation Patterns of American Household across Income Level in the 21 Century," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258245, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Dogbe, Wisdom & Gil, José M., 2018. "Effectiveness of a carbon tax to promote a climate-friendly food consumption," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 235-246.
    17. Violeta Chacon & Guillermo Paraje & Joaquin Barnoya & Frank J Chaloupka, 2018. "Own-price, cross-price, and expenditure elasticities on sugar-sweetened beverages in Guatemala," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Hovhannisyan, Vardges, 2016. "New Evidence On The Structure Of Food Demand In China: An Easi Demand Model Estimated Via Panel Data Techniques," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236889, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Zarko Kalamov, 2021. "Evaluating Marginal Internalities: A New Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 9476, CESifo.
    20. Tamíris Pacheco da Costa & James Gillespie & Katarzyna Pelc & Abi Adefisan & Michael Adefisan & Ramakrishnan Ramanathan & Fionnuala Murphy, 2022. "Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Food Supply Chain Environmental Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae15:211381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.