IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae09/50554.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Technical efficiency improvement of rice farming in southern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Kiatpathomchai, Sirirat
  • Schmitz, P. Michael
  • Thongrak, Sutonya

Abstract

The objective of this study is to assess the technical efficient frontier of rice farms using input-oriented data envelopment analysis. The frontier represents the minimum applicable level of efficiency of inputs given the current level of yields, technologies, and managerial ability among the farmers which can be used as a benchmark for efficiency improvement of rice farms. Two-stage DEA methodology of efficiency analysis was applied. The empirical results revealed that the technical efficiency of rice farming in southern Thailand could be improved through reduction of inputs by 8-14 % and the current output at 3.5 tons of paddy rice per ha could be maintained. In order to improve technical efficiency of rice farms in southern Thailand, our findings lead us to suggest advisory measures which focus on farm level under existing technology. The optimum rates of inputs for southern Thailand are 123-147 kg of seed, 60-77 kg of N-fertilizer, and 32-35 kg of P-fertilizer per ha. Over the long-run, new rice varieties which suitable for the south are needed. The new rice varieties should be improved from the traditional varieties which included non-photoperiod sensitive qualification.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiatpathomchai, Sirirat & Schmitz, P. Michael & Thongrak, Sutonya, 2009. "Technical efficiency improvement of rice farming in southern Thailand," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50554, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.50554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/50554/files/Sirirat_IAAE2009.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.50554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wossink, Ada & Denaux, Zulal S., 2006. "Environmental and cost efficiency of pesticide use in transgenic and conventional cotton production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-3), pages 312-328, October.
    2. Seiford, Lawrence M. & Thrall, Robert M., 1990. "Recent developments in DEA : The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1-2), pages 7-38.
    3. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2006. "Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-29122-2, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muazu, A. & Yahya, A. & Ishak, W.I.W. & Khairunniza-Bejo, S., 2015. "Energy audit for sustainable wetland paddy cultivation in Malaysia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 182-191.
    2. Wardah Qamar & Muhammad Younas & Muhammad Waseem, 2019. "Price Fluctuations of Rice Crop in District Sheikhupura," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 7(3), pages 227-239, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Saravia-Matus & T. S. Amjath-Babu & Sreejith Aravindakshan & Stefan Sieber & Jimmy A. Saravia & Sergio Gomez y Paloma, 2021. "Can Enhancing Efficiency Promote the Economic Viability of Smallholder Farmers? A Case of Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Zhou, Peng & Poh, Kim Leng & Ang, Beng Wah, 2007. "A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(1), pages 1-9, April.
    3. Maxim Kotsemir, 2013. "Measuring national innovation systems efficiency – a review of DEA approach," HSE Working papers WP BRP 16/STI/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    4. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2008. "A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(1), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Karin Eckstein & Jochen Kantelhardt & Helmut Hoffmann, 2008. "Effiziente Erbringung von Umweltleistungen durch landwirtschaftliche Betriebe - Empirische Studie in vier Agrarregionen Bayerns," Journal of Socio-Economics in Agriculture (Until 2015: Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture), Swiss Society for Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, vol. 1(1), pages 233-258.
    6. Nabavi-Pelesaraei, Ashkan & Rafiee, Shahin & Mohtasebi, Seyed Saeid & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Chau, Kwok-wing, 2019. "Assessment of optimized pattern in milling factories of rice production based on energy, environmental and economic objectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1259-1273.
    7. Pillai N., Vijayamohanan & AM, Narayanan, 2019. "Energy Efficiency Indicators: Estimation Methods," MPRA Paper 97653, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. An, Duong Hoai, 2022. "Performance of universities in Vietnam," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    9. Chia-Nan Wang & Hoang-Phu Nguyen & Cheng-Wen Chang, 2021. "Environmental Efficiency Evaluation in the Top Asian Economies: An Application of DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-19, April.
    10. Pillai N., Vijayamohanan & AM, Narayanan, 2019. "Energy Efficiency: A Sectoral Analysis for Kerala," MPRA Paper 101424, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Vladimir Krivonozhko & Finn Førsund & Andrey Lychev, 2012. "Returns-to-scale properties in DEA models: the fundamental role of interior points," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 121-130, October.
    12. Rödder, W. & Reucher, E., 2012. "Advanced X-efficiencies for CCR- and BCC-models – towards Peer-based DEA controlling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 467-476.
    13. Chaouk, Mohammed & Pagliari, Dr Romano & Moxon, Richard, 2020. "The impact of national macro-environment exogenous variables on airport efficiency," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    14. Payam Rashidi & Masoud Homayounifar & Taghi Ebrahimi Salari & Modjtaba Rouhani, 2017. "Measuring Economic and Environmental Performance of Energy Resources in ISIC codes: Evidence from Iran’s Industry Sector," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 109-109, December.
    15. Wen-Min Lu & Qian Long Kweh & Chung-Wei Wang, 2021. "Integration and application of rough sets and data envelopment analysis for assessments of the investment trusts industry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 163-194, January.
    16. Christian Growitsch & Tooraj Jamasb & Christine Müller & Matthias Wissner, 2016. "Social Cost Efficient Service Quality: Integrating Customer Valuation in Incentive Regulation—Evidence from the Case of Norway," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 71-91, Springer.
    17. Helmi Hammami & Thanh Ngo & David Tripe & Dinh-Tri Vo, 2022. "Ranking with a Euclidean common set of weights in data envelopment analysis: with application to the Eurozone banking sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 675-694, April.
    18. Wu, Yanrui, 1995. "The productive efficiency of Chinese iron and steel firms A stochastic frontier analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 215-222, September.
    19. Chenini Hajer & Jarboui Anis, 2018. "Analysis of the Impact of Governance on Bank Performance: Case of Commercial Tunisian Banks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(3), pages 871-895, September.
    20. Adler, Nicole & Friedman, Lea & Sinuany-Stern, Zilla, 2002. "Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 249-265, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.