IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi21/317068.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bio-Wertschöpfungsketten in Entwicklung: Lernende Systeme zwischen Exploration und Exploitation

Author

Listed:
  • Braun, Charis Linda
  • Bitsch, Vera
  • Häring, Anna Maria

Abstract

Die vorliegende Studie präsentiert den Entwicklungsprozess von Bio-Wertschöpfungsketten aus der Perspektive des organisationalen Lernens und geht der Frage nach, wie Veränderungen in Wertschöpfungsketten gestaltet werden. Die Basis bilden Daten aus einer Aktionsforschungsstudie, die den Lernprozess von Unternehmen in einer Wertschöpfungskette für Bio-Lebensmittel erforscht. Zusätzlich wurden fünf Gruppeninterviews mit sogenannten Wertschöpfungskettenentwickler:innen aus verschiedenen Regionen Deutschlands geführt. Die Ergebnisse bilden die Entwicklung von Wertschöpfungsketten in drei Lernphasen ab, vom gemeinsamen Erkunden des Problems, über eine Phase des Gestaltens, Experimentierens und Umsetzens, bis zur Verstetigung der Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Unternehmen der Wert-schöpfungskette. Der Veränderungsprozess pendelt dabei zwischen intra- und interorganisationalem sowie explorativem und exploitativem Lernen.

Suggested Citation

  • Braun, Charis Linda & Bitsch, Vera & Häring, Anna Maria, 2021. "Bio-Wertschöpfungsketten in Entwicklung: Lernende Systeme zwischen Exploration und Exploitation," 61st Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 22-24, 2021 317068, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317068
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.317068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/317068/files/155-Braun_b.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.317068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    2. H. Christopher Peterson, 2002. "The “Learning” Supply Chain: Pipeline or Pipedream?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1329-1336.
    3. Charis Linda Braun & Meike Rombach & Anna Maria Häring & Vera Bitsch, 2018. "A Local Gap in Sustainable Food Procurement: Organic Vegetables in Berlin’s School Meals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marlen Gabriele Arnold & Kai Hockerts, 2011. "The greening dutchman: Philips' process of green flagging to drive sustainable innovations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(6), pages 394-407, September.
    2. Hsieh, Chia-Chun & Ma, Zhiming & Novoselov, Kirill E., 2019. "Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 41-55.
    3. Xiong, Jiwei & Wang, Tao & Yang, Haibin, 2024. "Innovation search after failure: The role of peers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    4. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    5. Henri A. Schildt & Markku V.J. Maula & Thomas Keil, 2005. "Explorative and Exploitative Learning from External Corporate Ventures," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 29(4), pages 493-515, July.
    6. Giuliani, Elisa & Martinelli, Arianna & Rabellotti, Roberta, 2016. "Is Co-Invention Expediting Technological Catch Up? A Study of Collaboration between Emerging Country Firms and EU Inventors," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 192-205.
    7. Josse Delfgaauw & Otto H. Swank, 2016. "Task‐Specific Human Capital and Organizational Inertia," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 608-626, September.
    8. Peixu He & Yana Pei & Chunpei Lin & Di Ye, 2021. "Ambidextrous Marketing Capabilities, Exploratory and Exploitative Market-Based Innovation, and Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study on China’s Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Insoo Cho & Peter F. Orazem, 2021. "How endogenous risk preferences and sample selection affect analysis of firm survival," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1309-1332, April.
    10. Tomasz Helbin & Amy Van Looy, 2021. "Is Business Process Management (BPM) Ready for Ambidexterity? Conceptualization, Implementation Guidelines and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-25, February.
    11. Kornberger, Martin & Justesen, Lise & Mouritsen, Jan, 2011. "“When you make manager, we put a big mountain in front of you”: An ethnography of managers in a Big 4 Accounting Firm," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 514-533.
    12. Morgan Swink & Kejia Hu & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3710-3726, October.
    13. Son K. Lam & Thomas E. DeCarlo & Ashish Sharma, 2019. "Salesperson ambidexterity in customer engagement: do customer base characteristics matter?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 659-680, July.
    14. Inseong Song & Jonghoon Bae, 2016. "Politics, strong institution and competitive advantage: an examination of organizational aspiration for competition," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 412-443, December.
    15. Raluca Zoltan & Romulus Vancea, 2022. "Taylorism and Ambidexterity – A Systemic Perspective on Integrating Exploration and Exploitation in Organizations," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 768-775, September.
    16. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    17. Jonathan H. Reed, 2022. "Operational and strategic change during temporary turbulence: evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 589-608, June.
    18. Wagner, Rodrigo & Zahler, Andrés, 2015. "New exports from emerging markets: Do followers benefit from pioneers?," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 203-223.
    19. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    20. Kauremaa, Jouni & Nurmilaakso, Juha-Miikka & Tanskanen, Kari, 2010. "E-business enabled operational linkages: The role of RosettaNet in integrating the telecommunications supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(2), pages 343-357, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Farm Management;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi21:317068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.