IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea90/270978.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Poultry Industry As An Endogenous Factor In Mexican Agricultural Policy: A Neoclassical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jarvis, Lovell S.
  • Perali, C. Federico

Abstract

Rising meat demand in Mexico for chicken is alleged to have increased sorghum production and imports, thereby contributing to lower corn production and higher corn imports and prices. Because corn is consumed by the poor, a food versus feed controversy has emerged in Mexico. We model and empirically analyze this issue

Suggested Citation

  • Jarvis, Lovell S. & Perali, C. Federico, 1990. "The Poultry Industry As An Endogenous Factor In Mexican Agricultural Policy: A Neoclassical Approach," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270978, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea90:270978
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.270978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270978/files/aaea-1990-092.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/270978/files/aaea-1990-092.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.270978?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip C. Abbott, 1979. "Modeling International Grain Trade with Government Controlled Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(1), pages 22-31.
    2. Alex F. McCalla, 1982. "Impact of Macroeconomic Policies Upon Agricultural Trade and International Agricultural Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 861-868.
    3. Gordon C. Rausser, 1982. "Political Economic Markets: PERTs and PESTs in Food and Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 821-833.
    4. Kim, C. S., 1986. "Modeling Import Demand Under Government Intervention And Financial Constraints: The Case Of Corn In Mexico," Staff Reports 277848, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Alex F. McCalla, 1982. "Impact of Macroeconomic Policies Upon Agricultural Trade and International Agricultural Development," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 861-868, December.
    6. Gordon C. Rausser, 1982. "Political Economic Markets: PERTs and PESTs in Food and Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 821-833.
    7. Gordon C. Rausser, 1982. "Political Economic Markets: PERTs and PESTs in Food and Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 64(5), pages 821-833.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fertő, Imre, 1998. "Az agrárpolitika politikai gazdaságtana III. Vegyes motívumok az agrárpolitikában: termelő és ragadozó politikák [The political economy of agrarian policy. Part III. Mixed motives in agrarian polic," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(5), pages 424-436.
    2. Harvey, David R., 2004. "Policy dependency and reform: economic gains versus political pains," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 265-275, December.
    3. Richard E. Just & Gordon C. Rausser, 1989. "An Assessment of the Agricultural Economics Profession," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(5), pages 1177-1190.
    4. Rausser, Gordon C. & de Gorter, Harry, 1988. "Endogenizing Policy In Models Of Agricultural Markets," 1988 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Knoxville, Tennessee 270460, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Glenn C. W. Ames, 1991. "An observation on the political economy of agricultural policy making in the European Community," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(4), pages 375-388.
    6. Rausser, Gordon C., 1985. "Macroeconomic environment for U.S. agricultural policy," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2561m38d, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    7. Helfand, Gloria, 1988. "The Effects on Production and Profits of Different Forms of Pollution Control Standards," CUDARE Working Papers 198477, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Gordon C. Rausser, 1992. "Predatory versus Productive Government: The Case of U.S. Agricultural Policies," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 6(3), pages 133-157, Summer.
    9. Xi He, 2022. "Political and economic determinants of export restrictions in the agricultural and food sector," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(3), pages 439-453, May.
    10. D. MacLaren, 1991. "Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis And International Trade Theory: A Review Of Recent Developments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 250-297, September.
    11. Lee, David R. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1992. "The Structure of Research and Transfer Policies in International Agriculture: Evidence and Implications," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197731, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Harvey, D., 1997. "Which role should government take in the agri-food sector in the next decade," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 33.
    13. Rausser, Gordon C. & Wright, Brian D, 1987. "Alternative strategies for trade policy reform," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt2vr4399k, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    14. Jacobson, Elaine Mullaly & Emerson, Robert D., 1989. "The Influences Of Id Ogy And Economic Interests On Dairy Legislation," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270466, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Paola Corsinovi & Davide Gaeta, 2017. "European Wine Policies and their consequences on the global wine trade," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(1), pages 59-88.
    16. Wenshou Yan & Kaixing Huang, 2018. "Determinants of agricultural protection in China and the rest of the world," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 32(2), pages 64-75, November.
    17. Harald Witzke, 1986. "Endogenous supranational policy decisions: The Common Agricultural Policy of the European Community," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 157-174, January.
    18. Moore, Charles V., 1983. "The Reclamation Reform Act--P.E.S.T. Or Pesticide," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-9, December.
    19. Runge, C. Ford, 1990. "International Public Goods, Export Subsidies, and the Harmonization of Environmental Regulations," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50876, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    20. Beghin, John C & Kherallah, Mylene, 1994. "Political Institutions and International Patterns of Agricultural Protection," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 76(3), pages 482-489, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea90:270978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.