IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea12/129166.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation Of Estimators For Censored Systems Of Equations Using Monte Carlo Simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Yunfei
  • Marsh, Thomas L.
  • Li, Huixin

Abstract

This study makes an empirical comparison of estimators for censored equations using Monte Carlo simulation. The underlying data generation process is rarely known in practice. From the viewpoint of regression, both ordinary censoring rule and sample selection rule are logical rules of censoring. Furthermore, a mixed censoring rule is also possible to govern underlying data generation process. Therefore, it is valuable to examine whether estimators are robust to variations in the assumptions of censoring rules. Five estimators are examined, estimators for ordinary censoring rules include method of simulated scores, Bayesian estimation, and expectation maximization; estimators for sample selection rules include multivariate Heckman two-step method, and Shonkwiler - Yen two-step method. According to our findings, generally a substantial difference exists in the performance of estimators, and hence the choice of estimator appears to be of importance. Apart from difference in performance, estimates from all procedures are reasonably close to estimated parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Yunfei & Marsh, Thomas L. & Li, Huixin, 2012. "An Evaluation Of Estimators For Censored Systems Of Equations Using Monte Carlo Simulation," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 129166, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:129166
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.129166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/129166/files/2012%20AAEA%20Poster%20464%20ZHAO.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.129166?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ho-Chuan Huang, 2001. "Bayesian analysis of the SUR Tobit model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(9), pages 617-622.
    2. Vassilis A. Hajivassiliou & Daniel L. McFadden, 1998. "The Method of Simulated Scores for the Estimation of LDV Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(4), pages 863-896, July.
    3. Lennart Flood & Urban Gråsjo, 2001. "A Monte Carlo simulation study of Tobit models," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(9), pages 581-584.
    4. J. Scott Shonkwiler & Steven T. Yen, 1999. "Two-Step Estimation of a Censored System of Equations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 972-982.
    5. Harald Tauchmann, 2005. "Efficiency of two-step estimators for censored systems of equations: Shonkwiler and Yen reconsidered," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 367-374.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mutuc, Maria Erlinda M. & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Pan, Suwen & Yorobe, Jose M., 2012. "Impact Assessment of Bt Corn Adoption in the Philippines," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 117-135, February.
    2. Fadhuile, Adelaide & Lemarie, Stephane & Pirotte, Alain, 2011. "Pesticides Uses in Crop Production: What Can We Learn from French Farmers Practices?," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103654, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Peltner, Jonas & Thiele , Silke, 2021. "Elasticities of Food Demand in Germany – A Demand System Analysis Using Disaggregated Household Scanner Data," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(01), January.
    4. Torres, Marcelo de O. & Felthoven, Ronald G., 2014. "Productivity growth and product choice in catch share fisheries: The case of Alaska pollock," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 280-289.
    5. Seebens, Holger, 2009. "Child Welfare and Old-Age Security in Female Headed Households in Tanzania," IZA Discussion Papers 3929, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Burggraf, Christine & Kuhn, Lena & Zhao, Qi-ran & Teuber, Ramona & Glauben, Thomas, 2015. "Economic growth and nutrition transition: An empirical analysis comparing demand elasticities for foods in China and Russia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(6), pages 1008-1022.
    7. Demirdöğen, Alper & Olhan, Emine & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2016. "Food vs. fiber: An analysis of agricultural support policy in Turkey," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-8.
    8. Caillavet, France & Nichele, Veronique & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2008. "Are nutritional claims an adequate tool for public health? Evidence from food purchases in France," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44007, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Pan, Suwen & Jensen, Helen H., 2008. "Does the Food Stamp Program Affect Food Security Status and the Composition of Food Expenditures?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(01), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Luigi Cembalo & Francesco Caracciolo & Eugenio Pomarici, 2014. "Drinking cheaply: the demand for basic wine in Italy," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 58(3), pages 374-391, July.
    11. Rodrigo García Arancibia, 2013. "Curvas de Engel de alimentos fuera del hogar según circunstancia de consumo. el caso de Argentina," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, May.
    12. Fabrizio Balli & Silvia Tiezzi, 2010. "Equivalence scales, the cost of children and household consumption patterns in Italy," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 527-549, December.
    13. Geir Gustavsen & Kyrre Rickertsen, 2014. "Consumer cohorts and purchases of nonalcoholic beverages," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 427-449, March.
    14. Maria Erlinda M. Mutuc & Suwen Pan & Roderick M. Rejesus, 2007. "Household vegetable demand in the Philippines: Is there an urban-rural divide?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(4), pages 511-527.
    15. Peltner, Jonas & Thiele, Silke, 2021. "Elasticities of Food Demand in Germany – A Demand System Analysis Using Disaggregated Household Scanner Data," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(01), January.
    16. Harald Tauchmann, 2010. "Consistency of Heckman-type two-step estimators for the multivariate sample-selection model," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(30), pages 3895-3902.
    17. Maksym, Obrizan, 2010. "A Bayesian Model of Sample Selection with a Discrete Outcome Variable," MPRA Paper 28577, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Tim Pawlowski & Christoph Breuer, 2012. "Expenditure elasticities of the demand for leisure services," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(26), pages 3461-3477, September.
    19. Hasan Tekgüç, 2012. "Separability between own food production and consumption in Turkey," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 423-439, September.
    20. Maganga, Assa Mulagha & Phiri, M. Alexander R. & Mapemba, Lawrence D. & Gebremariam, Gebrelibanos G. & Dzanja, Josephy K., 2014. "A Food Demand System Estimation for Rural Malawi: Estimates Using Third Integrated Household Survey Data," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 174853, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics; Demand and Price Analysis; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea12:129166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.