IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaae10/96642.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Best fit model selection for spatial differences (regression) in the profitability analysis of precision phosphate (P) application to winter cereals in Precision Agriculture (PA)

Author

Listed:
  • Hough, Ella Christina
  • Nell, Wilhelm T.
  • Maine, Ntsikane
  • Groenewald, Jan A.
  • van der Rijst, M.

Abstract

Phosphates (P) are an important nutrient required by every living plant and animal cell, and deficiencies in soils could cause limited crop production, thereby reducing profitability. Phosphates are also a primary nutrient essential for root development and crop production, and are needed in the tissues of a plant where cells rapidly divide and enlarge. Precision agriculture (PA) could assist the farmer in applying the correct amount of P to the part of the field where it is required most. Variable rate technology (VRT) is a potential tool that can help with the development of strategies for phosphate fertilizer management. On-field trials were conducted on a commercial farm in the Western Cape Province; As many as five soil types occur on each field studied, and three crops – wheat, canola and barley - are grown in rotation. One half of each field was planted using VRT (PA), while constant application (SR) was used on the other half. The objective was to determine whether spatial econometric models are more accurate than traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) models in predicting the profitability impact of P on PA. There are significant differences to be observed between the results obtained with the OLS, Spatial Error (SER) and restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) models. All the measures of goodness of fit indicated an increase in fit from the OLS to the SER model, with the best fit being achieved with the REML model, implying that the use of this model resulted in more accurate estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Hough, Ella Christina & Nell, Wilhelm T. & Maine, Ntsikane & Groenewald, Jan A. & van der Rijst, M., 2010. "Best fit model selection for spatial differences (regression) in the profitability analysis of precision phosphate (P) application to winter cereals in Precision Agriculture (PA)," 2010 AAAE Third Conference/AEASA 48th Conference, September 19-23, 2010, Cape Town, South Africa 96642, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaae10:96642
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.96642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/96642/files/191.%20Phosphate%20application%20in%20precision%20agriculture%20in%20South%20Africa.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.96642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Griffin, Terry W. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2008. "Spatial Analysis of Precision Agriculture Data: Role for Extension," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6804, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Luc Anselin & Rodolfo Bongiovanni & Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer, 2004. "A Spatial Econometric Approach to the Economics of Site-Specific Nitrogen Management in Corn Production," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(3), pages 675-687.
    3. David S. Bullock & James Lowenberg‐DeBoer, 2007. "Using Spatial Analysis to Study the Values of Variable Rate Technology and Information," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 517-535, September.
    4. Lambert, Dayton M. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James & Bongiovanni, Rodolfo, 2003. "Spatial Regression Models For Yield Monitor Data: A Case Study From Argentina," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22022, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Madhu Khanna & Onesime Faustin Epouhe & Robert Hornbaker, 1999. "Site-Specific Crop Management: Adoption Patterns and Incentives," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 455-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mkondiwa, Maxwell Gibson, 2015. "Whither Broad or Spatially Specific Fertilizer Recommendations?," Master's Theses and Plan B Papers 237344, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    2. Queiroz, Pedro W. V. & Perrin, Richard K. & Fulginiti, Lilyan E. & Bullock, David S., 2023. "An Expected Value of Sample Information (EVSI) Approach for Estimating the Payoff from a Variable Rate Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(01), January.
    3. Nathan D. DeLay & Nathanael M. Thompson & James R. Mintert, 2022. "Precision agriculture technology adoption and technical efficiency," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 195-219, February.
    4. Garth Holloway & Donald Lacombe & James P. LeSage, 2007. "Spatial Econometric Issues for Bio‐Economic and Land‐Use Modelling," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 549-588, September.
    5. Curtiss, Jarmila & Jelinek, Ladislav, 2012. "Cost Efficiency and Farm Self-selection in Precision Farming: The Case of Czech Wheat Production," 131st Seminar, September 18-19, 2012, Prague, Czech Republic 135784, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Osei, Edward & Li, Huijun, 2016. "Value of information: costs and returns of precision corn production in Livingston County, Illinois," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236184, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Velandia, Margarita M. & Rejesus, Roderick M. & Segarra, Eduardo & Bronson, Kevin, 2006. "Economics of Management Zone Delineation in Cotton Precision Agriculture," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35387, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. DeLay, Nathan & Comstock, Haden, 2021. "Recent Trends in PA Technology Adoption and Bundling in CornProduction: Implications for Farm Consolidation," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    9. Hough, E.C. & Nell, W.T. & Maine, N. & Groenewald, J.A., 2011. "PR - Winter Grain Response To Phosphorus Variation On Different Soil Types Under Precision Agriculture (pa) (p347-358)," 18th Congress, Methven, New Zealand, 2011 345569, International Farm Management Association.
    10. Velandia Margarita & Roderick M. Rejesus & Eduardo Segarra & Kevin Bronson, 2004. "Un análisis económico de la aproximación estadística para el establecimiento de zonas de manejo en agricultura de precisión: caso de algodón en Texas," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, September.
    11. Perrin, Richard K. & Queiroz, Pedro & Silva, Felipe & Fulginiti, Lilyan E., 2018. "Ex-ante expected payoff from variable rate N application: an expected value of sample information (EVSI) approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274351, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Osei, Edward & Jafri, Syed H., 2015. "In-field Spatial Variability and Profitability of Precision Nitrogen Application On Corn in Buchanan County, Iowa," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205845, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. David S. Bullock & James Lowenberg‐DeBoer, 2007. "Using Spatial Analysis to Study the Values of Variable Rate Technology and Information," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 517-535, September.
    14. Fang Zou & Qingming Zhan & Weisi Zhang, 2018. "Quantifying the impact of human activities on geological hazards in mountainous areas: evidence from Shennongjia, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 90(1), pages 137-155, January.
    15. Fan, Yubing & McCann, Laura E., 2015. "Households' Adoption of Drought Tolerant Plants: An Adaptation to Climate Change?," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205544, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Nawab Khan & Ram L. Ray & Hazem S. Kassem & Muhammad Ihtisham & Badar Naseem Siddiqui & Shemei Zhang, 2022. "Can Cooperative Supports and Adoption of Improved Technologies Help Increase Agricultural Income? Evidence from a Recent Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Jon T. Biermacher & B. Wade Brorsen & Francis M. Epplin & John B. Solie & William R. Raun, 2009. "The economic potential of precision nitrogen application with wheat based on plant sensing," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(4), pages 397-407, July.
    18. J Blasch & B van der Kroon & P van Beukering & R Munster & S Fabiani & P Nino & S Vanino, 2022. "Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 33-81.
    19. Martinho, Vítor João Pereira Domingues, 2011. "Analysis of spatial effects in vine crop across Portuguese regions," MPRA Paper 33200, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Beate Skånseng & Birger Svihus & Knut Rudi & Pål Trosvik & Birgitte Moen, 2013. "Effect of Different Feed Structures and Bedding on the Horizontal Spread of Campylobacter jejuni within Broiler Flocks," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaae10:96642. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaaeaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.