IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlfba/204543.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Räumliche Nähe gestalten, aber wie? Eine empirische Fallstudie anhand ausgewählter deutscher Technologieparks

In: Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns

Author

Listed:
  • Schlich, Elena

Abstract

Als Bausteine der Wissensökonomie gelten die drei in Verbindung stehenden Faktoren Wissen, Lernen und Innovationen (OECD 1996). In den vergangenen Jahrzehnten wurde versucht, diese drei Faktoren hinsichtlich ihres systematischen Wirkungs- und Einflusszusammenhangs mittels zahlreicher innovationstheoretischer Konzepte zu beschreiben. Als ein bedeutender Bestandteil des Innovationsprozesses wurde zunächst die räumliche Nähe jeweiliger Wissensträger zueinander identifiziert. Die räumliche Nähe stellt dabei jedoch keine hinreichende Bedingung dar. Erst die Kombination mit weiteren Näheformen sowie physisch-räumlichen Gestaltungsmerkmalen lässt ihre innovationsbefördernde Wirkung entfalten. Mit dem damit erhaltenen innovationstheoretischen Prozessverständnis ging die Hoffnung einer Beeinflussbarkeit des Innovationsprozesses einher, welcher insbesondere für den wirtschaftspolitischen Bereich im Rahmen der Konstruktion lokaler Wissensinfrastrukturen von großer Bedeutsamkeit ist. Als Zeitzeugen der Entwicklung innovationstheoretischer Erkenntnisse können dabei Technologieparks (TP) herangezogen werden. Im Folgenden wird daher kurz die Entwicklung des TP-Konzepts dargestellt und zugleich sollen die von ihm ausgehenden innovationsbefördernden Auswirkungen, die durch seine spezifische Gestaltung der räumlichen Nähe entstehen, überprüft werden. Anhand von drei Fallbeispielen wird aufgezeigt, dass das TP-Konzept einer Anpassung an die innovationsbefördernden Bedarfe vor Ort ansässiger Organisationen unterliegt, jedoch zeigen die Analysen, dass nicht alle Maßnahmen und Instrumente der innovationsbefördernden Wissensvernetzung vor Ort zugutekommen.

Suggested Citation

  • Schlich, Elena, 2019. "Räumliche Nähe gestalten, aber wie? Eine empirische Fallstudie anhand ausgewählter deutscher Technologieparks," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 105-116, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:204543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/204543/1/1677921803.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Annerstedt, 2006. "Science Parks and High-Tech Clustering," Chapters, in: Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), International Handbook on Industrial Policy, chapter 14, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Maskell, Peter & Malmberg, Anders, 1999. "Localised Learning and Industrial Competitiveness," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 23(2), pages 167-185, March.
    3. Anne Ter Wal & Ron Boschma, 2009. "Applying social network analysis in economic geography: framing some key analytic issues," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 43(3), pages 739-756, September.
    4. Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), 2006. "International Handbook on Industrial Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3451.
    5. Ron Boschma, 2005. "Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 61-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Qiao & Chengjun Ji, 2024. "Industry Network Structure Determines Regional Economic Resilience: An Empirical Study Using Stress Testing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, July.
    2. Gergő Tóth & Zoltán Elekes & Adam Whittle & Changjun Lee & Dieter F. Kogler, 2022. "Technology Network Structure Conditions the Economic Resilience of Regions," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 98(4), pages 355-378, August.
    3. Balázs Lengyel & Rikard H. Eriksson, 2017. "Co-worker networks, labour mobility and productivity growth in regions," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 17(3), pages 635-660.
    4. Grillitsch, Markus, 2014. "Institutional Change and Economic Evolution in Regions," Papers in Innovation Studies 2014/1, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Balázs Lengyel & Rikard H. Eriksson, 2015. "Co-worker networks and productivity growth in regions," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1513, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised May 2015.
    6. Schlich, Elena, 2022. "Spatial proximity and how to shape it: An empirical case study of selected German technology parks," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Spatial transformation: Processes, strategies, research design, volume 19, pages 99-108, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Markus Grillitsch, 2014. "Regional Transformation: Institutional Change and Economic Evolution in Regions," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1481, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Ekaterina Turkina & Ari Van Assche & Raja Kali, 2016. "Network Structure and Industrial Clustering Dynamics in the Aerospace Industry," CIRANO Working Papers 2016s-14, CIRANO.
    9. Wang, Liang & Tan, Justin & Li, Wan, 2018. "The impacts of spatial positioning on regional new venture creation and firm mortality over the industry life cycle," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 41-52.
    10. Sándor Juhász, 2021. "Spinoffs and tie formation in cluster knowledge networks," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1385-1404, April.
    11. Rosina Moreno & Ernest Miguélez, 2012. "A Relational Approach To The Geography Of Innovation: A Typology Of Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 492-516, July.
    12. Tom Broekel & Wladimir Mueller, 2018. "Critical links in knowledge networks – What about proximities and gatekeeper organisations?," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(10), pages 919-939, November.
    13. José-Vicente Tomás-Miquel & Gabriel Brătucu & Manuel Expósito-Langa & Oana Bărbulescu, 2018. "The Relevance of Collaborative Networks in Emerging Clusters. The Case of Muntenia-Oltenia Regions in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Stefano Usai & Emanuela Marrocu & Raffaele Paci, 2017. "Networks, Proximities, and Interfirm Knowledge Exchanges," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 40(4), pages 377-404, July.
    15. Meng, Rüdiger, 2012. "Räumliche Aspekte der Innovationsförderung: Hintergründe, Perspektiven und Kritik," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Growe, Anna & Heider, Katharina & Lamker, Christian & Paßlick, Sandra & Terfrüchte, Thomas (ed.), Polyzentrale Stadtregionen - Die Region als planerischer Handlungsraum, volume 3, pages 241-254, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    16. López-Estornell, Manuel & Tortajada Esparza, Enrique & Martinez-Chafer, l, 2012. "The evolution toward vagueness of industrial district concept and its impact on regional innovation policy," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201211, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    17. Ng, Wei Keat Benny & Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Cloodt, Myriam & Arentze, Theo, 2019. "Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 719-732.
    18. Mariia Shkolnykova & Muhamed Kudic, 2022. "Who benefits from SMEs’ radical innovations?—empirical evidence from German biotechnology," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1157-1185, February.
    19. Hassine, Haithem Ben & Mathieu, Claude, 2020. "R&D crowding out or R&D leverage effects: An evaluation of the french cluster-oriented technology policy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    20. Anja Dettmann & Sidonia Proff & Thomas Brenner, 2015. "Co-operation over distance? The spatial dimension of inter-organizational innovation collaboration," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 729-753, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:204543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.