IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/spshcp/978-3-031-23643-3_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

On a Turning Point in Sraffa’s Theoretical and Interpretative Position in the Late 1920s

In: Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Pierangelo Garegnani

    (Roma Tre University)

Abstract

Sraffa’s notes titled ‘Summer 1927’ (D3/12/3, Trinity Catalogue) presumably written while preparing for the lectures on the theory of value he intended to hold in Cambridge that Autumn, when examined jointly with the lectures in fact delivered in 1928–31 and other manuscripts from the period make it possible to identify an important change occurring in those months in his theoretical position and in his interpretation of Ricardo and the Classical economists. From his previous acceptance of Marshall’s apparatus of demand and supply once purged of the subjective elements of utility and ‘efforts and sacrifices’, Sraffa moved on to a theory of relative prices and distribution based on what he then called ‘physical real costs’ (in opposition to Marshall’s subjective ‘real costs’) and to the consequent conception of a ‘surplus product’ providing for profits and rent. It is the theory which Sraffa recognized then to be that of Smith and Ricardo and the ‘old classical economists’, beyond the Marshallian interpretation of those authors he had previously shared, in terms of constant returns and, therefore, of the demand and supply apparatus. That is the interpretation that will emerge twenty years later in the Introduction to Ricardo’s Principles (1951), just as that is essentially the theory we shall find in Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities thirty years later.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierangelo Garegnani, 2024. "On a Turning Point in Sraffa’s Theoretical and Interpretative Position in the Late 1920s," Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Roberto Ciccone (ed.), Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand, pages 491-525, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:spshcp:978-3-031-23643-3_16
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-23643-3_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pierangelo Garegnani, 2024. "Misunderstanding Classical Economics? A Reply to Blaug," Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Roberto Ciccone (ed.), Capital Theory, the Surplus Approach, and Effective Demand, pages 341-352, Springer.
    2. Samuel Hollander, 2000. "Sraffa and the Interpretation of Ricardo: The Marxian Dimension," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 187-232, Summer.
    3. Pier Luigi Porta, 1986. "Understanding the Significance of Piero Sraffa's Standard Commodity: A Note on the Marxian Notion of Surplus," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 18(3), pages 443-454, Fall.
    4. Pier Luigi Porta, 2000. "Sraffa’s Ricardo after Fifty Years - A Preliminary Estimate," Working Papers 26, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Aug 2000.
    5. Heinz Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2005. "Representing the production and circulation of commodities in material terms: On Sraffa's objectivism," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 413-441.
    6. Christian Gehrke & Heinz D. Kurz, 2006. "Sraffa on von Bortkiewicz: Reconstructing the Classical Theory of Value and Distribution," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 38(1), pages 91-149, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rosselli, Annalisa & Trabucchi, Paolo, 2019. "Sraffa, the ‘marginal’ method and change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 334-340.
    2. Sinha, Ajit & Dupertuis, Michel-Stéphane, 2009. "Sraffa's system: Equal rate of profits and the notion of center of gravitation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 495-501, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duccio Cavalieri, 2009. "Sull'inseparabilit? delle strutture sintattiche nell'analisi classica del valore e della distribuzione," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(97), pages 5-46.
    2. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2011. "In Favor of Rigor and Relevance: A Reply to Mark Blaug," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 607-616, Fall.
    3. Pier Luigi Porta, 2013. "What remains of Sraffa's economics," Working Papers 242, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised May 2013.
    4. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "Heterodox surplus approach: production, prices, and value theory," MPRA Paper 31824, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Alessandro Le Donne, 2022. "Quale Marx? A partire da una rilettura di Marx e gli economisti classici di Pierangelo Garegnani (Which Marx? A discussion from a re-reading of Marx and the classical economists by Pierangelo Garegnan," Moneta e Credito, Economia civile, vol. 75(299), pages 327-338.
    6. Naldi, Nerio, 2018. "On the Origins of Piero Sraffa’s Equations. New Evidence Following Pierangelo Garegnani’s Lead," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP33, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    7. Ginzburg, Andrea, 2014. "Two translators: Gramsci and Sraffa," Centro Sraffa Working Papers CSWP1, Centro di Ricerche e Documentazione "Piero Sraffa".
    8. Kurz, Heinz D., 2006. "The agents of production are the commodities themselves: On the classical theory of production, distribution and value," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Pierangelo Garegnani, 2005. "Capital And Intertemporal Equilibria: A Reply To Mandler," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 411-437, November.
    10. Heinz D. Kurz, 2011. "The Contributions of Two Eminent Japanese Scholars to the Development of Economic Theory: Michio Morishima and Takashi Negishi," Chapters, in: Heinz D. Kurz & Tamotsu Nishizawa & Keith Tribe (ed.), The Dissemination of Economic Ideas, chapter 13, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Kurz, Heinz D. & Salvadori, Neri, 2023. "Marx's concept of “exploitation” and the problem of measurement," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 887-896.
    12. Saverio M. Fratini, 2018. "Theories of Value and Ultimate Standards in Sraffa’s Notes of Summer 1927," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 12(1-2), pages 35-53, June.
    13. Rosselli, Annalisa & Trabucchi, Paolo, 2019. "Sraffa, the ‘marginal’ method and change," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 334-340.
    14. J. Barkley Rosser, 2020. "Austrian themes and the Cambridge capital theory controversies," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 415-431, December.
    15. Ajit Sinha, 2000. "The Transformation Problem: Is the Standard Commodity a Solution?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 32(2), pages 265-281, June.
    16. Enrico Sergio Levrero, 2012. "Theories of Value from Adam Smith to Piero Sraffa," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 527-535, July.
    17. Fabio Ravagnani, 2020. "Sraffa on non-self-replacing systems: a note," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 44(4), pages 943-952.
    18. Scott Carter, 2018. "On the Hijacking of the Intellectual and Archival Legacy of Piero Sraffa: A Comment on Ajit Sinha (2016)—A Revolution in Economic Theory: The Economics of Piero Sraffa," Bulletin of Political Economy, Bulletin of Political Economy, vol. 12(1-2), pages 3-34, June.
    19. Samuel Hollander, 2001. "Malthus and Classical Economies : The Malthus-Ricardo Relationship," Cahiers d'Économie Politique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(1), pages 11-23.
    20. Lee, Frederic & Jo, Tae-Hee, 2010. "Heterodox production and cost theory of the business enterprise," MPRA Paper 27635, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:spshcp:978-3-031-23643-3_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.