IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14198_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How to Get Out of the Transatlantic Regulatory Deadlock Over Genetically Modified Organisms?

In: Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Alemanno

Abstract

This well-documented book analyzes the possibilities and constraints of regulatory cooperation between the EU and the US (particularly California) with a specific focus on environmental protection, food safety and agriculture, biosafety and biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Alemanno, 2011. "How to Get Out of the Transatlantic Regulatory Deadlock Over Genetically Modified Organisms?," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14198_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781849807548.00021.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alberto Alemanno, 2007. "Trade in Food: Regulatory and Judicial Approaches in the EC and the WTO," Post-Print hal-00638647, HAL.
    2. Noah Zerbe, 2007. "Risking Regulation, Regulating Risk: Lessons from the Transatlantic Biotech Dispute," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 24(5), pages 407-423, September.
    3. David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14198.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kelley, Jonathan, 2014. "Beware of feedback effects among trust, risk and public opinion: Quantitative estimates of rational versus emotional influences on attitudes toward genetic modification," MPRA Paper 60585, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Yan Cai & Eunmi Kim, 2019. "Sustainable Development in World Trade Law: Application of the Precautionary Principle in Korea-Radionuclides," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Alessandra Arcuri, 2015. "The Transformation of organic regulation: The ambiguous effects of publicization," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 144-159, June.
    4. Stranadko, Nataliya, 2021. "EU-US climate cooperation: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Paris agreement," Discussion Papers 02/2021, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    5. Chris Ansell & Jörg Balsiger, 2011. "Circuits of Regulation: Transatlantic Perspectives on Persistent Organic Pollutants and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Anne C.M. Meuwese, 2011. "EU–US Horizontal Regulatory Cooperation: Mutual Recognition of Impact Assessment?," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Christina G. Hioureas & Bruce E. Cain, 2011. "Transatlantic Environmental Regulation-making: Strengthening Cooperation between California and the EU," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Szajkowska, Anna, 2009. "From mutual recognition to mutual scientific opinion? Constitutional framework for risk analysis in EU food safety law," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 529-538, December.
    9. Jonathan Lewallen, 2021. "Emerging technologies and problem definition uncertainty: The case of cybersecurity," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1035-1052, October.
    10. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Conclusions and Implications," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Bernd M.J. Van der Meulen, 2013. "The Structure of European Food Law," Laws, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-30, April.
    12. Eve Fouilleux & Allison Loconto, 2017. "Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 1-14, March.
    13. David E. Winickoff & Kendra Klein, 2011. "Food Labels and the Environment: Towards Harmonization of EU and US Organic Standards," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Jale Tosun & Susumu Shikano, 2016. "GMO-free regions in Europe: an analysis of diffusion patterns," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(6), pages 743-759, June.
    15. Pei, Xiaofang & Tandon, Annuradha & Alldrick, Anton & Giorgi, Liana & Huang, Wei & Yang, Ruijia, 2011. "The China melamine milk scandal and its implications for food safety regulation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 412-420, June.
    16. Megan R. Schwarzman & Michael P. Wilson, 2011. "Reshaping Chemicals Policy on Two Sides of the Atlantic: The Promise of Improved Sustainability through International Collaboration," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Jerome S. Legge Jr. & Robert F. Durant, 2010. "Public Opinion, Risk Assessment, and Biotechnology: Lessons from Attitudes toward Genetically Modified Foods in the European Union," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(1), pages 59-76, January.
    18. Sandra Hoffmann, 2010. "Ensuring Food Safety around the Globe: The Many Roles of Risk Analysis From Risk Ranking to Microbial Risk Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 711-714, May.
    19. Ann E. Carlson, 2011. "California Motor Vehicle Standards and Federalism: Lessons for the EU," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 3, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Adam Thorn, 2018. "Issue definition and conflict expansion: the role of risk to human health as an issue definition strategy in an environmental conflict," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(1), pages 59-76, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14198_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.