IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14198_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Circuits of Regulation: Transatlantic Perspectives on Persistent Organic Pollutants and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals

In: Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Ansell
  • Jörg Balsiger

Abstract

This well-documented book analyzes the possibilities and constraints of regulatory cooperation between the EU and the US (particularly California) with a specific focus on environmental protection, food safety and agriculture, biosafety and biodiversity.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Ansell & Jörg Balsiger, 2011. "Circuits of Regulation: Transatlantic Perspectives on Persistent Organic Pollutants and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14198_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781849807548.00020.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kelemen, R. Daniel, 2000. "Regulatory Federalism: EU Environmental Regulation in Comparative Perspective," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(2), pages 133-167, August.
    2. Aynsley Kellow & Anthony R. Zito, 2002. "Steering through Complexity: EU Environmental Regulation in the International Context," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(1), pages 43-60, March.
    3. David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14198.
    4. Jason Vogel, 2004. "Tunnel vision: The regulation of endocrine disruptors," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 37(3), pages 277-303, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Benson & Andrew Jordan, 2014. "Explaining Task Allocation in the EU: ‘Retooling’ Federalism for Comparative Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 794-809, July.
    2. Aynsley Kellow, 2012. "Multi-level and multi-arena governance: the limits of integration and the possibilities of forum shopping," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 327-342, November.
    3. Arens, Ludwig & Thulke, Hans-Hermann & Eisinger, Dirk & Theuvsen, Ludwig, 2012. "Administrative cooperation and disease control in cross-border pork production," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 473-482.
    4. Alessandra Arcuri, 2015. "The Transformation of organic regulation: The ambiguous effects of publicization," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 144-159, June.
    5. Stranadko, Nataliya, 2021. "EU-US climate cooperation: Challenges and opportunities for the implementation of the Paris agreement," Discussion Papers 02/2021, Europa-Kolleg Hamburg, Institute for European Integration.
    6. Eric Brouillat & Maïder Saint Jean, 2020. "Mind the gap: Investigating the impact of implementation gaps on cleaner technology transition," Post-Print hal-03490256, HAL.
    7. Sangeeta Sonak & Mahesh Sonak & Asha Giriyan, 2008. "Shipping hazardous waste: implications for economically developing countries," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 143-159, June.
    8. Pier Domenico Tortola, 2014. "The Limits of Normalization: Taking Stock of the EU‐US Comparative Literature," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(6), pages 1342-1357, November.
    9. Anne C.M. Meuwese, 2011. "EU–US Horizontal Regulatory Cooperation: Mutual Recognition of Impact Assessment?," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 11, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Christina G. Hioureas & Bruce E. Cain, 2011. "Transatlantic Environmental Regulation-making: Strengthening Cooperation between California and the EU," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Eric Brouillat & Maïder Saint-Jean, 2019. "Dura lex sed lex: why implementation gaps in environmental policy matter?," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2019-04, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    12. Hannah Murphy & Aynsley Kellow, 2013. "Forum Shopping in Global Governance: Understanding States, Business and NGOs in Multiple Arenas," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 4(2), pages 139-149, May.
    13. Axel Marx & Jan Wouters, 2011. "Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation: Conclusions and Implications," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 12, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Jørgen K. Knudsen, 2010. "Integration of Environmental Concerns in a Trans‐Atlantic Perspective: The Case of Renewable Electricity," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 27(2), pages 127-146, March.
    15. Eve Fouilleux & Allison Loconto, 2017. "Voluntary standards, certification, and accreditation in the global organic agriculture field: a tripartite model of techno-politics," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(1), pages 1-14, March.
    16. David E. Winickoff & Kendra Klein, 2011. "Food Labels and the Environment: Towards Harmonization of EU and US Organic Standards," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 10, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Alberto Alemanno, 2011. "How to Get Out of the Transatlantic Regulatory Deadlock Over Genetically Modified Organisms?," Chapters, in: David Vogel & Johan Swinnen (ed.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Tom Butler & Damien McGovern, 2012. "A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 221-235, April.
    19. Florence Metz & Karin Ingold, 2017. "Politics of the precautionary principle: assessing actors’ preferences in water protection policy," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 721-743, December.
    20. Pulzl, Helga & Rametsteiner, Ewald, 2002. "Grounding international modes of governance into National Forest Programmes," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 259-268, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14198_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.