Jae Nahm

Personal Details

First Name:	Jae
Middle Name:
Last Name:	Nahm
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:	pna322
	[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
Terminal Degree:	2000 Department of Economics; Harvard University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Department of Economics
Korea University

Seoul, South Korea
http://econ.korea.ac.kr/
RePEc:edi:deckukr (more details at EDIRC)

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

Sorry, no citations of working papers recorded.

Articles

1. Choi, Jay Pil & Nahm, Jae, 2016. "Merger Simulation In An Open Economy," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 57(1), pages 53-66, June.

   Cited by:

   1. Pierre Bernhard & Marc Deschamps, 2020. "Le Modèle de Cournot avec entrées aléatoires de firmes," Post-Print hal-03547666, HAL.
      • Pierre Bernhard & Marc Deschamps, 2020. "Le Modèle de Cournot avec entrées aléatoires de firmes," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03547666, HAL.

2. Nahm, Jae, 2008. "The effects of one-way compatibility on technology adoption in systems markets," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 269-278, September.

   Cited by:

   1. Claussen, Jörg & Kretschmer, Tobias & Spengler, Thomas, 2012. "Market leadership through technology - backward compatibility in the U.S. handheld video game industry," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121760, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
      • Jörg Claussen & Tobias Kretschmer & Thomas Spengler, 2012. "Market Leadership Through Technology - Backward Compatibility in the U.S. Handheld Video Game Industry," CEP Discussion Papers dp1124, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
      • Claussen, Jörg & Kretschmer, Tobias & Spengler, Thomas, 2010. "Market leadership through technology – Backward compatibility in the U.S. Handheld Video Game Industry," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 12716, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.
   2. Claussen, Jörg & Kretschmer, Tobias & Spengler, Thomas, 2010. "Backward Compatibility to Sustain Market Dominance – Evidence from the US Handheld Video Game Industry," Discussion Papers in Business Administration 11499, University of Munich, Munich School of Management.

3. Leonard K. Cheng & Jae Nahm, 2007. "Product boundary, vertical competition, and the double mark-upproblem," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(2), pages 447-466, June.

   Cited by:

   1. Takanori Adachi & Takeshi Ebina & Makoto Hanazono, 2017. "Endogenous Product Boundary," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 85(1), pages 13-40, January.
   2. Vladimir I. Soloviev & Natalia A. Iliina & Marina V. Samoyavcheva, 2009. "Cournot Equilibrium In A Model Of Hardware And Software Manufacturers' Interaction," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 1(11), pages 1-4.
   3. Duarte Brito & Margarida Catalão‐Lopes, 2010. "Mergers Of Producers Of Complements: How Autonomous Markets Change The Price Effects," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 78(1), pages 60-75, January.
   4. Takanori Adachi & Takeshi Ebina, 2014. "Complementing Cournot’s analysis of complements: unidirectional complementarity and mergers," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 239-261, April.
   5. Thomas D. Jeitschko & Yeonjei Jung & Jaesoo Kim, 2017. "Bundling and joint marketing by rival firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 571-589, September.
      • Jeitschko, Thomas D. & Jung, Yeonjei & Kim, Jaesoo, 2014. "Bundling and joint marketing by rival firms," DICE Discussion Papers 144, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
   6. Taylan Yalcin & Elie Ofek & Oded Koenigsberg & Eyal Biyalogorsky, 2013. "Complementary Goods: Creating, Capturing, and Competing for Value," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 554-569, July.
   7. Ramon Casadesus-Masanell & Barry Nalebuff & David B. Yoffie, 2007. "Competing Complements," Working Papers 07-44, NET Institute, revised Nov 2007.
   8. Packalen, Mikko, 2010. "Complements and potential competition," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 244-253, May.
   9. Decarolis, Francesco & Li, Muxin, 2023. "Regulating Online Search in the EU: From the Android Case to the Digital Markets Act and Digital Services Act," CEPR Discussion Papers 18177, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
      • Decarolis, Francesco & Li, Muxin, 2023. "Regulating online search in the EU: From the android case to the digital markets act and digital services act," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
   10. Alexei Alexandrov, 2006. "Fat Products," Discussion Papers 1435, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
       • Alexei Alexandrov, 2008. "Fat Products," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(1), pages 67-95, March.
   11. Cheng Leonard K & Nahm Jae, 2010. "Asymmetric Complementary Goods Pricing under Sequential Moves," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, May.
   12. Takanori Adachi & Takeshi Ebina & Makoto Hanazono, 2011. "Option Package Bundling," KIER Working Papers 785, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
   13. Lleras, Juan S. & Miller, Nathan H., 2011. "The entry incentives of complementary producers: A simple model with implications for antitrust policy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 147-150, February.
   14. Gans, Joshua S., 2011. "Remedies for tying in computer applications," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 505-512, September.

4. Kim, Jeong-Yoo & Nahm, Jae, 2007. "Reexamining the effect of the most-favored-nation provision in input prices on R and D incentives," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 201-217, February.

   Cited by:

   1. Jeong-Yoo Kim, 2009. "Competition in the LM market," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 209-218, October.
   2. Hermalin, Benjamin E. & Katz, Michael L, 2009. "Information and the Hold-Up Problem," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt782315gb, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
      • Benjamin E. Hermalin & Michael L. Katz, 2009. "Information and the hold‐up problem," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 40(3), pages 405-423, September.

5. Jay Pil Choi & Eirik Gaard Kristiansen & Jae Nahm, 2005. "An Economic Analysis of Product Pre-announcements," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 51(2-3), pages 299-319.

   Cited by:

   1. Choi, Jay Pil & Kristiansen, Eirik Gaard & Nahm, Jae, 2019. "Strategic Product Pre-announcements in Markets with Network Effects," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 60(1), pages 1-20, June.
      • Jay Pil Choi & Eirik Gaard Kristiansen & Jae Nahm, 2005. "Strategic Product Pre-announcements in Markets with Network Effects," Working Papers 05-09, NET Institute, revised Sep 2005.
   2. K. Sudhir & Ramesh Shankar & Yuan Jin, 2022. "Consumer Guilt and Sustainable Choice: Environmental Impact of Durable Goods Innovation," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2320, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
   3. Elie Ofek & Özge Turut, 2013. "Vaporware, Suddenware, and Trueware: New Product Preannouncements Under Market Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 342-355, March.
   4. Ram Rao & Ozge Turut, 2019. "New Product Preannouncement: Phantom Products and the Osborne Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(8), pages 3776-3799, August.
   5. Sreya Kolay, 2018. "Tie-in contracts with downstream competition," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 43-77, March.
   6. Michelle Y. Lu & Jiwoong Shin, 2018. "A Model of Two-Sided Costly Communication for Building New Product Category Demand," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 382-402, May.

6. Jae Nahm, 2004. "Open Architecture And R&D Incentives," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(4), pages 547-568, December.

   Cited by:

   1. Kevin Boudreau, 2010. "Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(10), pages 1849-1872, October.
   2. Gauguier, Jean-Jacques, 2009. "L’industrialisation de l’Open Source," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/4388 edited by Toledano, Joëlle.
   3. Peng Huang & Marco Ceccagnoli & Chris Forman & D. J. Wu, 2013. "Appropriability Mechanisms and the Platform Partnership Decision: Evidence from Enterprise Software," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 102-121, July.

7. Jae Nahm, 2004. "Durable‐Goods Monopoly with Endogenous Innovation," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(2), pages 303-319, June.

   Cited by:

   1. Chun‐Hui Miao, 2010. "Tying, Compatibility And Planned Obsolescence," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 579-606, September.
      • Miao, Chun-Hui, 2008. "Tying, Compatibility and Planned Obsolescence," MPRA Paper 13523, University Library of Munich, Germany.
   2. Utaka, Atsuo, 2008. "Pricing strategy, quality signaling, and entry deterrence," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 878-888, July.
   3. Esma Koca & Tommaso Valletti & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2021. "Designing Digital Rollovers: Managing Perceived Obsolescence through Release Times," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3698-3712, October.
   4. Liu, Hsin-Hsien, 2013. "How promotional frames affect upgrade intentions," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 237-248.
   5. Amit Mehra & Ram Bala & Ramesh Sankaranarayanan, 2012. "Competitive Behavior-Based Price Discrimination for Software Upgrades," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 60-74, March.
   6. Evrim Dener, 2007. "Quality Uncertainty and Time Inconsistency in a Durable Good Market," Departmental Working Papers 0707, Southern Methodist University, Department of Economics.
   7. Atsuo Utaka, 2015. "High Price Strategy and Quality Signalling," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 66(3), pages 408-420, September.
   8. Jong-Hee Hahn & Jin-Hyuk Kim, 2012. "Monopoly R&D and Compatibility Decisions in Network Industries," Working papers 2012rwp-43, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
   9. Roland Strausz, "undated". "Planned Obsolescence and the Provision of Unobservable Quality," Papers 028, Departmental Working Papers.
   10. William Caylor, 2016. "Credible Signals Of The Release Of New Versions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 862-878, April.
   11. Anton, James J. & Biglaiser, Gary, 2013. "Quality, upgrades and equilibrium in a dynamic monopoly market," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(3), pages 1179-1212.
   12. Michael Waldman, 2004. "Antitrust Perspectives for Durable-Goods Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 1306, CESifo.
   13. Joseph Guiltinan, 2010. "Consumer durables replacement decision-making: An overview and research agenda," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 163-174, June.
   14. Jiri Strelicky & Kresimir Zigic, 2013. "Software Upgrades under Monopoly," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp478, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
   15. Evrim Dener, 2011. "Quality uncertainty and time inconsistency in a durable good market," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 104(1), pages 1-24, September.
   16. Atsuo Utaka, 2022. "Clearance sales and new product introduction," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 73(3), pages 539-554, July.
   17. Jing, Fei & Lin, Jun & Zhang, Qiao & Qian, Yanjun, 2022. "New technology introduction and product rollover strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 324-336.
   18. Miao, Chun-Hui, 2011. "Planned obsolescence and monopoly undersupply," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 51-58, March.
   19. Calvano, Emilio, 2006. "Destructive Creation," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 653, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 30 Dec 2007.

8. Nahm, Jae, 2003. "The gatekeeper's optimal fee structure when sellers can price discriminate," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 9-14, July.

   Cited by:

   1. Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107069978, September.
      • Belleflamme,Paul & Peitz,Martin, 2015. "Industrial Organization," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107687899, September.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Featured entries

This author is featured on the following reading lists, publication compilations, Wikipedia, or ReplicationWiki entries:

1. Korean Economists

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.

1. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2006-08-26
2. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (1) 2006-08-26
3. NEP-TID: Technology and Industrial Dynamics (1) 2006-08-26

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Jae Nahm should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.