IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pmu575.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ahuva Mu'alem

Personal Details

First Name:Ahuva
Middle Name:
Last Name:Mu'alem
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pmu575
https://sites.google.com/site/ahuvamualem/
Terminal Degree:2005 Department of Economics; Hebrew University of Jerusalem (from RePEc Genealogy)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2014. "Fair by design: Multidimensional envy-free mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 29-46.
  2. Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu’alem & Noam Nisan, 2009. "Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 407-423, March.
  3. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Nisan, Noam, 2008. "Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 612-631, November.
  4. Sushil Bikhchandani & Shurojit Chatterji & Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu'alem & Noam Nisan & Arunava Sen, 2006. "Weak Monotonicity Characterizes Deterministic Dominant-Strategy Implementation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1109-1132, July.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2014. "Fair by design: Multidimensional envy-free mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 29-46.

    Cited by:

    1. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Schapira, Michael, 2018. "Setting lower bounds on truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 174-193.

  2. Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu’alem & Noam Nisan, 2009. "Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 407-423, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Mishra, Debasis & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "Robertsʼ Theorem with neutrality: A social welfare ordering approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 283-298.
    2. Hammond, Peter J., 2020. "Roberts' Weak Welfarism Theorem : A Minor Correction," CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series 66, Centre for Research in Economic Theory and its Applications CRETA.
    3. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Andrew McLennan & Rabee Tourky, 2012. "Truthful Implementation and Preference Aggregation in Restricted Domains," Discussion Papers Series 459, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    4. Mishra, Debasis & Nath, Swaprava & Roy, Souvik, 2018. "Separability and decomposition in mechanism design with transfers," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 240-261.
    5. Philippe Jehiel & Moritz Meyer-Ter-Vehn & Benny Moldovanu, 2008. "Ex-post implementation and preference aggregation via potentials," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754256, HAL.
    6. Campbell, Donald E. & Kelly, Jerry S., 2010. "Strategy-proofness and weighted voting," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 15-23, July.
    7. Paul H. Edelman & John A. Weymark, 2021. "Dominant strategy implementability and zero length cycles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1120, November.
    8. De, Parikshit & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2019. "Balanced implementability of sequencing rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 342-353.
    9. Katherine Cuff & Sunghoon Hong & Jesse Schwartz & Quan Wen & John Weymark, 2012. "Dominant strategy implementation with a convex product space of valuations," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 567-597, July.
    10. Kumar, Ujjwal & Roy, Souvik, 2021. "Local incentive compatibility in ordinal type-spaces," MPRA Paper 110994, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Thierry Marchant & Debasis Mishra, 2015. "Mechanism design with two alternatives in quasi-linear environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(2), pages 433-455, February.
    12. Jacob K. Goeree & Alexey Kushnir, 2011. "On the equivalence of Bayesian and dominant strategy implementation in a general class of social choice problems," ECON - Working Papers 021, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    13. Ryoto Ando & Kei Kimura & Taiki Todo & Makoto Yokoo, 2024. "Parameterized Voter Relevance in Facility Location Games with Tree-Shaped Invitation Graphs," Papers 2411.05574, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2024.

  3. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Nisan, Noam, 2008. "Truthful approximation mechanisms for restricted combinatorial auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 612-631, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Dütting, Paul & Talgam-Cohen, Inbal & Roughgarden, Tim, 2017. "Modularity and greed in double auctions," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 83199, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Jarman, Felix & Meisner, Vincent, 2017. "Ex-Post Optimal Knapsack Procurement," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 27, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Babaioff, Moshe & Blumrosen, Liad, 2008. "Computationally-feasible truthful auctions for convex bundles," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 588-620, July.
    4. Peyman Khezr & Vijay Mohan & Lionel Page, 2024. "Strategic Bidding in Knapsack Auctions," Papers 2403.07928, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    5. Paul Dütting & Vasilis Gkatzelis & Tim Roughgarden, 2017. "The Performance of Deferred-Acceptance Auctions," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 897-914, November.
    6. Shahar Dobzinski & Noam Nisan & Michael Schapira, 2005. "Truthful Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions," Discussion Paper Series dp408, The Federmann Center for the Study of Rationality, the Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
    7. Fadaei, Salman & Bichler, Martin, 2017. "Truthfulness with value-maximizing bidders: On the limits of approximation in combinatorial markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 767-777.
    8. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang, 2019. "Mechanism design for first-mile ridesharing based on personalized requirements part II: Solution algorithm for large-scale problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 172-192.
    9. Deshi Ye & Feng Xie & Guochuan Zhang, 2022. "Truthful mechanism design for bin packing with applications on cloud computing," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(4), pages 2224-2245, November.
    10. Dütting, Paul & Talgam-Cohen, Inbal & Roughgarden, Tim, 2017. "Modularity and greed in double auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 59-83.
    11. Deshi Ye & Feng Xie & Guochuan Zhang, 0. "Truthful mechanism design for bin packing with applications on cloud computing," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-22.
    12. Stößer, Jochen & Neumann, Dirk & Weinhardt, Christof, 2010. "Market-based pricing in grids: On strategic manipulation and computational cost," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 464-475, June.
    13. Bin Li & Dong Hao & Dengji Zhao, 2020. "Incentive-Compatible Diffusion Auctions," Papers 2001.06975, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    14. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Schapira, Michael, 2018. "Setting lower bounds on truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 174-193.
    15. Martin Bichler & Zhen Hao & Richard Littmann & Stefan Waldherr, 2020. "Strategyproof auction mechanisms for network procurement," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 42(4), pages 965-994, December.
    16. Sano, Ryuji, 2011. "Incentives in core-selecting auctions with single-minded bidders," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 72(2), pages 602-606, June.
    17. Vijay Mohan & Peyman Khezr, 2024. "Blockchains, MEV and the knapsack problem: a primer," Papers 2403.19077, arXiv.org.
    18. Vöcking, Berthold, 2019. "A universally-truthful approximation scheme for multi-unit auctions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 4-16.

  4. Sushil Bikhchandani & Shurojit Chatterji & Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu'alem & Noam Nisan & Arunava Sen, 2006. "Weak Monotonicity Characterizes Deterministic Dominant-Strategy Implementation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 1109-1132, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Kos, Nenad & Messner, Matthias, 2013. "Incentive compatibility in non-quasilinear environments," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 12-14.
    2. Mishra, Debasis & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "Robertsʼ Theorem with neutrality: A social welfare ordering approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 283-298.
    3. Paul H. Edelman & John A Weymark, 2017. "Dominant Strategy Implementability, Zero Length Cycles, and Affine Maximizers," Vanderbilt University Department of Economics Working Papers 17-00002, Vanderbilt University Department of Economics.
    4. Hitoshi Matsushima, 2011. "Efficient Combinatorial Exchanges with Opt-Out Types (Revised version of CARF-F-258)(Published in the B. E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 19 (1), 2019.)," CARF F-Series CARF-F-294, Center for Advanced Research in Finance, Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo, revised Aug 2012.
    5. , & ,, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional dichotomous domains," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 8(2), May.
    6. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Ely, Jeffrey C., 2013. "Mechanism design without revenue equivalence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 104-133.
    7. Mohammad Akbarpour & Scott Duke Kominers & Kevin Michael Li & Shengwu Li & Paul Milgrom, 2023. "Algorithmic Mechanism Design With Investment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(6), pages 1969-2003, November.
    8. Hitoshi Matsushima, 2011. "Efficient Combinatorial Exchanges," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-826, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    9. Ron Lavi & Ahuva Mu’alem & Noam Nisan, 2009. "Two simplified proofs for Roberts’ theorem," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 32(3), pages 407-423, March.
    10. M. Yenmez, 2015. "Incentive compatible market design with applications," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(3), pages 543-569, August.
    11. Rahul Deb & Debasis Mishra, 2013. "Implementation with Securities," Working Papers tecipa-484, University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
    12. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Mechanism design without quasilinearity," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(2), May.
    13. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object allocation: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Working Papers e116, Tokyo Center for Economic Research.
    14. Alexey Kushnir & Vinod Krishnamoorthy, 2022. "A Simple Characterization of Supply Correspondences," Papers 2205.10472, arXiv.org.
    15. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Andrew McLennan & Rabee Tourky, 2012. "Truthful Implementation and Preference Aggregation in Restricted Domains," Discussion Papers Series 459, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    16. Müller, R.J. & Perea ý Monsuwé, A. & Wolf, S., 2005. "Weak monotonicity and Bayes-Nash incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 040, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    17. Rahman, David M., 2024. "Detecting profitable deviations," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Yoon, Kiho, 2020. "Implementability with contingent contracts," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Vincent Anesi, 2018. "Dynamic Legislative Policy Making under Adverse Selection," Discussion Papers 2018-08, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    20. Heydenreich, B. & Müller, R.J. & Uetz, M.J. & Vohra, R., 2007. "Characterization of revenue equivalence," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    21. Rahul Deb & Debasis Mishra, 2014. "Implementation with contingent contracts," Discussion Papers 14-01, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    22. Fasil Alemante & Donald E. Campbell & Jerry S. Kelly, 2016. "Characterizing the resolute part of monotonic social choice correspondences," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 62(4), pages 765-783, October.
    23. Mishra, Debasis & Pramanik, Anup & Roy, Souvik, 2014. "Multidimensional mechanism design in single peaked type spaces," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 103-116.
    24. Debasis Mishra & Anup Pramanik & Souvik Roy, 2013. "Implementation in multidimensional domains with ordinal restrictions," Discussion Papers 13-07, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    25. Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2024. "Multidimensional screening after 37 years," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    26. Tang, Rui & Zhang, Mu, 2021. "Maxmin implementation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    27. Debasis Mishra & Abdul Quadir, 2012. "Deterministic single object auctions with private values," Discussion Papers 12-06, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    28. Philippe Jehiel & Moritz Meyer-Ter-Vehn & Benny Moldovanu, 2008. "Ex-post implementation and preference aggregation via potentials," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-00754256, HAL.
    29. Kazumura, Tomoya & Mishra, Debasis & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2020. "Strategy-proof multi-object mechanism design: Ex-post revenue maximization with non-quasilinear preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    30. Fadel, Ronald & Segal, Ilya, 2009. "The communication cost of selfishness," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(5), pages 1895-1920, September.
    31. Dobzinski, Shahar & Lavi, Ron & Nisan, Noam, 2012. "Multi-unit auctions with budget limits," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 486-503.
    32. Archer, Aaron & Kleinberg, Robert, 2014. "Truthful germs are contagious: A local-to-global characterization of truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 340-366.
    33. Peter Postl, 2011. "Strategy-Proof Compromises," Discussion Papers 10-12, Department of Economics, University of Birmingham.
    34. Manipushpak Mitra & Arunava Sen, 2010. "Efficient allocation of heterogenous commodities with balanced transfers," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(1), pages 29-48, June.
    35. Carbajal, Juan Carlos, 2010. "On the uniqueness of Groves mechanisms and the payoff equivalence principle," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 763-772, March.
    36. Liu, Peng & Zeng, Huaxia, 2019. "Random assignments on preference domains with a tier structure," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 176-194.
    37. Yu Chen & Zhenhua Wu, 2012. "Delegation Principle for Multi-agency Games under Ex Post Equilibrium," CAEPR Working Papers 2012-008, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    38. Paul H. Edelman & John A. Weymark, 2021. "Dominant strategy implementability and zero length cycles," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1091-1120, November.
    39. Georgiou, Konstantinos & Swamy, Chaitanya, 2019. "Black-box reductions for cost-sharing mechanism design," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 17-37.
    40. Dobzinski, Shahar & Nisan, Noam, 2015. "Multi-unit auctions: Beyond Roberts," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 14-44.
    41. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Müller, Rudolf, 2017. "Monotonicity and revenue equivalence domains by monotonic transformations in differences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 29-35.
    42. Birgit Heydenreich & Rudolf Müller & Marc Uetz, 2010. "Mechanism Design for Decentralized Online Machine Scheduling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 445-457, April.
    43. Berger, A. & Müller, R.J. & Naeemi, S.H., 2010. "Path-monotonicity and incentive compatibility," Research Memorandum 035, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    44. Frongillo, Rafael M. & Kash, Ian A., 2021. "General truthfulness characterizations via convex analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 636-662.
    45. Caleb Koch, 2020. "Implementation with ex post hidden actions," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 5(1), pages 1-35, December.
    46. Bin Li & Dong Hao & Dengji Zhao, 2020. "Incentive-Compatible Diffusion Auctions," Papers 2001.06975, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    47. Tomoya Kazumura & Debasis Mishra & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2017. "Strategy-proof multi-object auction design: Ex-post revenue maximization with no wastage," Discussion Papers 17-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    48. Leucci, Stefano & Mamageishvili, Akaki & Penna, Paolo, 2018. "No truthful mechanism can be better than n approximate for two natural problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 64-74.
    49. De, Parikshit & Mitra, Manipushpak, 2019. "Balanced implementability of sequencing rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 342-353.
    50. Yi, Jianxin, 2011. "Implementation via mechanisms with transfers," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 65-70, January.
    51. Mu'alem, Ahuva & Schapira, Michael, 2018. "Setting lower bounds on truthfulness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 174-193.
    52. Katherine Cuff & Sunghoon Hong & Jesse Schwartz & Quan Wen & John Weymark, 2012. "Dominant strategy implementation with a convex product space of valuations," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(2), pages 567-597, July.
    53. Levent Ulku, 2012. "Nonmonotone Mechanism Design," Working Papers 1202, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM.
    54. Thierry Marchant & Debasis Mishra, 2015. "Mechanism design with two alternatives in quasi-linear environments," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 44(2), pages 433-455, February.
    55. S. M. Reza Dibaj & Ali Miri & SeyedAkbar Mostafavi, 2020. "A cloud dynamic online double auction mechanism (DODAM) for sustainable pricing," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 461-480, December.
    56. Alexey Kushnir & Shuo Liu, 2019. "On the equivalence of Bayesian and dominant strategy implementation for environments with nonlinear utilities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(3), pages 617-644, April.
    57. Juan Carlos Carbajal & Rudolf Müller, 2015. "Implementability under Monotonic Transformations in Differences," Working Papers 37, Peruvian Economic Association.
    58. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Mu'alem, Ahuva, 2020. "Selling mechanisms for a financially constrained buyer," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 386-405.
    59. Lavi, Ron & Swamy, Chaitanya, 2009. "Truthful mechanism design for multidimensional scheduling via cycle monotonicity," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 99-124, September.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ahuva Mu'alem should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.