IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pxa8.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira

Personal Details

First Name:Emanuel
Middle Name:
Last Name:Xavier-Oliveira
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pxa8
http://www.mtu.edu/business/school/faculty/emanuel-oliveira/

Affiliation

School of Business and Economics
Michigan Technological University

Houghton, Michigan (United States)
http://www.sbea.mtu.edu/
RePEc:edi:sbmtuus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles

Articles

  1. Rawashdeh, Rami Al & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Maxwell, Philip, 2016. "The potash market and its future prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-163.
  2. Saurav Pathak & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira & André O. Laplume, 2016. "Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 506-529, June.
  3. Saurav Pathak & André Laplume & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira, 2015. "Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5-6), pages 334-356, June.
  4. Saurav Pathak & André O. Laplume & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira, 2014. "Opportunity recognition, intellectual property rights, barriers to technological adoption and technology entrepreneurship in emerging economies: a multilevel analysis," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 130-158.
  5. Pathak, Saurav & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Laplume, André O., 2013. "Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2090-2101.
  6. Steven Cassou & Emanuel Xavier de Oliveira, 2011. "Barriers to technological adoption in Spain and Portugal," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 10(3), pages 189-209, December.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Rawashdeh, Rami Al & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Maxwell, Philip, 2016. "The potash market and its future prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 154-163.

    Cited by:

    1. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Research papers & Policy papers on Economic Trends and Policies 1603, Policy Center for the New South.
    2. Al Rawashdeh, Rami, 2020. "World peak potash: An analytical study," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. Mahmuda Nasrin & Pooja Vortia & Shakila Salam & Md. Salauddin Palash, 2022. "Is fertilizer demand elastic to its own price? Assessing the consequences of fertilizer subsidy policy in Bangladesh," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Song, Xiaoqian & Geng, Yong & Zhang, Yuquan & Zhang, Xi & Gao, Ziyan & Li, Minghang, 2022. "Dynamic potassium flows analysis in China for 2010–2019," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Rami Rawashdeh, 2023. "Estimating short-run (SR) and long-run (LR) demand elasticities of phosphate," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(2), pages 239-253, June.
    6. Yakovleva, Natalia & Chiwona, Annock G. & Manning, David A.C. & Heidrich, Oliver, 2021. "Circular economy and six approaches to improve potassium life cycle for global crop production," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    7. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Policy briefs on Economic Trends and Policies 1603, Policy Center for the New South.
    8. Ilinova, Alina & Dmitrieva, Diana & Kraslawski, Andrzej, 2021. "Influence of COVID-19 pandemic on fertilizer companies: The role of competitive advantages," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    9. Vining, Aidan R. & Moore, Mark A., 2017. "Potash ownership and extraction: Between a rock and a hard place in Saskatchewan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 71-80.
    10. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Research papers & Policy papers on Trade Dynamics and Policies 1602, Policy Center for the New South.
    11. Dmitrieva, D. & Ilinova, A. & Kraslawski, A., 2017. "Strategic management of the potash industry in Russia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 81-89.
    12. Yves Jégourel, 2016. "Potash: a typical price war," Policy briefs on Trade Dynamics and Policies 1602, Policy Center for the New South.
    13. Yan, Jingchun & Shen, Laihong & Ou, Zhaowei & Wu, Jian & Jiang, Shouxi & Gu, Haiming, 2019. "Enhancing the performance of iron ore by introducing K and Na ions from biomass ashes in a CLC process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 168-180.

  2. Saurav Pathak & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira & André O. Laplume, 2016. "Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 506-529, June.

    Cited by:

    1. B. Urban & J. Chantson, 2019. "Academic entrepreneurship in South Africa: testing for entrepreneurial intentions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 948-980, June.
    2. José Ernesto Amorós & Carlos Poblete & Vesna Mandakovic, 2019. "R&D transfer, policy and innovative ambitious entrepreneurship: evidence from Latin American countries," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1396-1415, October.
    3. Pavlos Kilintzis & Giorgos Avlogiaris & Elpida Samara & Yiannis Bakouros, 2023. "Technology Entrepreneurship: a Model for the European Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 879-904, June.
    4. Miocevic, Dario & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma, 2022. "Competition from informal firms and product innovation in EU candidate countries: A bounded rationality approach," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).

  3. Saurav Pathak & André Laplume & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira, 2015. "Inbound foreign direct investment and domestic entrepreneurial activity," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5-6), pages 334-356, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Sanghyun Hong & W. Robert Reed & Bifei Tian & Tingting Wu & Gen Chen, 2021. "Does FDI Promote Entrepreneurial Activities? A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 21/03, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    2. Bettin, Giulia & Massidda, Carla & Piras, Romano, 2024. "The intertwined role of social and financial remittances in new firms' creation," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    3. Fang, Hanqing & Chrisman, James J. & Memili, Esra & Wang, Minglin, 2020. "Foreign venture presence and domestic entrepreneurship: A macro level study," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Ross Brown & Colin Mason, 2017. "Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 11-30, June.
    5. Sara Amoroso & Bettina Mueller, 2017. "The short-run effects of Knowledge intensive greenfield FDI on new domestic entry," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2017-02, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Yassaman Saadatmand & Dennis Barber, 2019. "Globalization, Gender And Entrepreneurial Activities In Latin America," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(04), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Serpil Dom Tomak, 2018. "An Analysis of the Macroeconomic Determinants of Entrepreneurial Activity in Turkey," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 8(2), pages 128-136.
    8. Su, Zhongfeng & Li, Jiatao & Wei, Shihao & Wu, Zhan, 2024. "Effect of inward foreign direct investment on entrepreneurship productivity in emerging markets," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    9. Silveli Cristo-Andrade & João J. Ferreira, 2020. "Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship: what researches and approaches?," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 263-286, March.
    10. Tung Son Ha & Vu Tuan Chu & Mai Tuyet Thi Nguyen & Dung Hoai Thi Nguyen & Anh Ngoc Thi Nguyen, 2021. "The impact of Greenfield investment on domestic entrepreneurship," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Yeganegi, Sepideh & Laplume, André O. & Dass, Parshotam, 2021. "The role of information availability: A longitudinal analysis of technology entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).

  4. Saurav Pathak & André O. Laplume & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira, 2014. "Opportunity recognition, intellectual property rights, barriers to technological adoption and technology entrepreneurship in emerging economies: a multilevel analysis," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 130-158.

    Cited by:

    1. Fusen Zhao & Yuhao Zhao & Silin Li, 2024. "How does intellectual property system affect technology entrepreneurship: evidence from Chinese prefecture‐level cities," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 38(1), pages 110-130, May.

  5. Pathak, Saurav & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Laplume, André O., 2013. "Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2090-2101.

    Cited by:

    1. Sanghyun Hong & W. Robert Reed & Bifei Tian & Tingting Wu & Gen Chen, 2021. "Does FDI Promote Entrepreneurial Activities? A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers in Economics 21/03, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    2. Nasirov, Shukhrat & Gokh, Irina & Filippaios, Fragkiskos, 2022. "Technological radicalness, R&D internationalization, and the moderating effect of intellectual property protection," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 215-227.
    3. Desislava Yordanova & José António Filipe & Manuel Pacheco Coelho, 2020. "Technopreneurial Intentions among Bulgarian STEM Students: The Role of University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Pengfei Cheng & Xiaofeng Wang & Baekryul Choi & Xingang Huan, 2023. "Green Finance, International Technology Spillover and Green Technology Innovation: A New Perspective of Regional Innovation Capability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. David Urbano & Sebastian Aparicio & David Audretsch, 2019. "Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 21-49, June.
    6. Yoon, Hyungseok (David) & Kim, Namil & Buisson, Bernard & Phillips, Fred, 2018. "A cross-national study of knowledge, government intervention, and innovative nascent entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 243-252.
    7. Pavlos Kilintzis & Giorgos Avlogiaris & Elpida Samara & Yiannis Bakouros, 2023. "Technology Entrepreneurship: a Model for the European Case," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(2), pages 879-904, June.
    8. Desislava Yordanova & Jose António Filipe, 2018. "Desirability of Technology Entrepreneurship among Bulgarian STEM Students: The Role of Entrepreneurship Education," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 446-462.
    9. Christopher J. Boudreaux & Boris Nikolaev, 2019. "Capital is not enough: opportunity entrepreneurship and formal institutions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 709-738, October.
    10. Claudiu Tiberiu Albulescu & Matei Tămăşilă, 2016. "Exploring the role of FDI in enhancing the entrepreneurial activity in Europe: a panel data analysis," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 629-657, September.
    11. Gao, Xing & Meng, Jing & Ling, Yantao & Liao, Maolin & Cao, Mengqiu, 2022. "Localisation economies, intellectual property rights protection and entrepreneurship in China: A Bayesian analysis of multi-level spatial correlation," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 156-165.
    12. Lo, Chu-Ping, 2016. "Intellectual property, research intensity, and scale effect," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2297-2301.
    13. Saurav Pathak & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira & André O. Laplume, 2016. "Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 506-529, June.
    14. Chen, Yi-Min & Ni, Yu-Ting & Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Teng, Ying-Maw, 2015. "Information- and rivalry-based perspectives on reactive patent litigation strategy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 788-792.
    15. José L. González-Pernía & Andrés Jung & Iñaki Peña, 2015. "Innovation-driven entrepreneurship in developing economies," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(9-10), pages 555-573, October.
    16. Sharma, Abhijit & Sousa, Cristina & Woodward, Richard, 2022. "Determinants of innovation outcomes: The role of institutional quality," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    17. Russell S. Sobel & J. R. Clark, 2018. "The use of knowledge in technology entrepreneurship: A theoretical foundation," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 31(2), pages 195-207, June.
    18. Leitão, Maria Eugénia & Amaral, Miguel & Carvalho, Ana, 2024. "Reconceptualizing socio-tech entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    19. Ping Zhang & Xin Wei & Guirong Mao, 2024. "Cultural diversity, social integration, and migrant entrepreneurship—evidence from the China migrants dynamic survey," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 1135-1155, March.
    20. Majdouline, Ilias & Baz, Jamal El & Jebli, Fedwa, 2022. "Revisiting technological entrepreneurship research: An updated bibliometric analysis of the state of art," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    21. Atilla Öner, M. & Kunday, Özlem, 2016. "A study on Schumpeterian and Kirznerian entrepreneurship in Turkey: 2006–2013," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 62-71.
    22. Zhao, Xiaoyang & Weng, Zongyuan, 2024. "Digital dividend or divide: The digital economy and urban entrepreneurial activity," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    23. Kelvin W. Willoughby, 2020. "Endogenous innovation, outward-bound international patenting and national economic development," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 844-869, June.
    24. Jinbo Wang & Maosheng Ran & Yi Li & Heng Zhan, 2022. "Is venture capital a catalyst for innovative entrepreneurship in China? Empirical analysis based on the PSM‐DID method," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(4), pages 1039-1058, June.
    25. Li, Qinghai & Deng, Ping, 2017. "From international new ventures to MNCs: Crossing the chasm effect on internationalization paths," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 92-100.
    26. Gao, Xing & Meng, Jing & Ling, Yantao & Liao, Maolin & Cao, Mengqiu, 2022. "Localisation economies, intellectual property rights protection and entrepreneurship in China: a Bayesian analysis of multi-level spatial correlation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114290, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    27. Nguyen, Phuc Canh & Nguyen, Bach & Thanh, Su Dinh, 2022. "The importance of export diversification for national entrepreneurship density," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 114-129.

  6. Steven Cassou & Emanuel Xavier de Oliveira, 2011. "Barriers to technological adoption in Spain and Portugal," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 10(3), pages 189-209, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Saurav Pathak & Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira & André O. Laplume, 2016. "Technology use and availability in entrepreneurship: informal economy as moderator of institutions in emerging economies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 506-529, June.
    2. Pathak, Saurav & Xavier-Oliveira, Emanuel & Laplume, André O., 2013. "Influence of intellectual property, foreign investment, and technological adoption on technology entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2090-2101.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Emanuel Xavier-Oliveira should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.