IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/psu193.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ching-jen Sun

Personal Details

First Name:Ching-jen
Middle Name:
Last Name:Sun
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psu193
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
Terminal Degree:2008 Department of Economics; Ohio State University (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Department of Economics
Business School
Deakin University

Melbourne, Australia
http://www.deakin.edu.au/business/economics
RePEc:edi:sedeaau (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Gomis-Porqueras, Pedro & Sun, Ching-jen, 2019. "Fiat Money as a Public Signal, Medium of Exchange, and Punishment," MPRA Paper 94327, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Nejat Anbarci & Richard Dutu & Ching-Jen Sun, 2019. "On the Timing of Production Decisions in Monetary Economies," Post-Print hal-02313851, HAL.
  3. Nejat Anbarcı & Ching-Jen Sun & M. Utku Ünver, 2015. "Designing Practical and Fair Sequential Team Contests," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 871, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 15 Apr 2021.
  4. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-Jen & Ãœnver, M. Utku, 2015. "Designing fair tiebreak mechanisms: the case of FIFA penalty shootouts," Working Papers eco_2015_5, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  5. Sun, Ching-jen, 2015. "The bargaining correspondence: when Edgeworth meets Nash," Working Papers eco_2015_4, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  6. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2012. "Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Solutions: A Simple Nash Program," Working Papers 2012_9, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  7. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2012. "Robustness of Intermediate Agreements and Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 2012_7, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  8. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2009. "Robustness of Intermediate Agreements and Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 2009_14, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  9. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2009. "Weakest Collective Rationality and the Nash Bargaining Solution," Working Papers 2009_16, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  10. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2009. "Distributive Justice and Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 2009_20, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  11. Sun, Ching-Jen, 2008. "A note on the dynamics of incentive contracts," Working Papers eco_2008_23, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  12. Sun, Ching-jen, 2007. "Dynamic Price Discrimination and Quality Provision Based on Purchase History," MPRA Paper 9855, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Aug 2008.
  13. Sun, Ching-jen, 2005. "Dynamic Price Dispersion in a Bertrand-Edgeworth Model," MPRA Paper 9854, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Dec 2007.

Articles

  1. Chun-Ting Chen & Wei-Torng Juang & Ching-Jen Sun, 2024. "Cross invariance, the Shapley value, and the Shapley–Shubik power index," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 62(2), pages 397-418, March.
  2. Jia, Hao & Sun, Ching-jen, 2021. "The optimal entry fee-prize ratio in Tullock contests," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
  3. Anbarcı, Nejat & Sun, Ching-Jen & Ünver, M. Utku, 2021. "Designing practical and fair sequential team contests: The case of penalty shootouts," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 25-43.
  4. Sun, Ching-jen, 2020. "A sandwich theorem for generic n × n two person games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 86-95.
  5. Gomis-Porqueras Pedro & Sun Ching-Jen, 2020. "Fiat Money as a Public Signal, Medium of Exchange, and Punishment," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 1-11, June.
  6. Roy, Jaideep & Silvers, Randy & Sun, Ching-Jen, 2019. "Majoritarian preference, utilitarian welfare and public information in Cournot oligopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 269-288.
  7. Nejat Anbarci & Richard Dutu & Ching‐Jen Sun, 2019. "On The Timing Of Production Decisions In Monetary Economies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(1), pages 447-472, February.
  8. Ching-jen Sun, 2018. "The bargaining correspondence: when Edgeworth meets Nash," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 337-359, August.
  9. Ching-jen Sun, 2017. "Dynamic price dispersion in Bertrand–Edgeworth competition," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 235-261, March.
  10. Sun Ching-Jen, 2014. "Dynamic Price Discrimination with Customer Recognition," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 217-250, January.
  11. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Robustness of intermediate agreements and bargaining solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 367-376.
  12. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions: A simple Nash program," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 211-214.
  13. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 453-470, September.
  14. Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "A note on the dynamics of incentive contracts," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(3), pages 645-653, August.
  15. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "Weakest collective rationality and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 425-429, September.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Nejat Anbarci & Richard Dutu & Ching-Jen Sun, 2019. "On the Timing of Production Decisions in Monetary Economies," Post-Print hal-02313851, HAL.

    Cited by:

    1. Baughman, Garth & Rabinovich, Stanislav, 2021. "Capacity choice, monetary trade, and the cost of inflation," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    2. Lebeau, Lucie, 2020. "Credit frictions and participation in over-the-counter markets," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

  2. Nejat Anbarcı & Ching-Jen Sun & M. Utku Ünver, 2015. "Designing Practical and Fair Sequential Team Contests," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 871, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 15 Apr 2021.

    Cited by:

    1. Csató, László, 2019. "A note on the UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs," MPRA Paper 93006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Karlsson, Niklas & Lunander, Anders, 2022. "The Strategic Jump - The Order Effect on Winning “The Final Three” in Long Jump Competitions," Working Papers 2022:8, Örebro University, School of Business.
    3. Singh, Aaditya & Scarf, Phil & Baker, Rose, 2023. "A unified theory for bivariate scores in possessive ball-sports: The case of handball," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1099-1112.
    4. Mackenzie, Andrew & Komornik, Vilmos, 2023. "Fairly taking turns," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 743-764.
    5. Brams, Steven & Ismail, Mehmet S. & Kilgour, Marc, 2023. "Fairer Shootouts in Soccer: The m-n Rule," MPRA Paper 116352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Brams, Steven J. & Ismail, Mehmet S., 2016. "Making the Rules of Sports Fairer," MPRA Paper 69714, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Steven J. Brams & Mehmet S. Ismail, 2024. "Multi-Tier Tournaments: Matching and Scoring Players," Papers 2407.13845, arXiv.org.

  3. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-Jen & Ãœnver, M. Utku, 2015. "Designing fair tiebreak mechanisms: the case of FIFA penalty shootouts," Working Papers eco_2015_5, Deakin University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Kendall, Graham & Lenten, Liam J.A., 2017. "When sports rules go awry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 377-394.
    2. Csató, László, 2019. "A note on the UEFA Euro 2020 qualifying play-offs," MPRA Paper 93006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Mario Chater & Luc Arrondel & Jean-Pascal Gayant & Jean-François Laslier, 2021. "Fixing match-fixing: Optimal schedules to promote competitiveness," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03229942, HAL.
    4. Steven J. Brams & Mehmet S. Ismail & D. Marc Kilgour & Walter Stromquist, 2018. "Catch-Up: A Rule that Makes Service Sports More Competitive," Papers 1808.06922, arXiv.org.
    5. László Csató, 2021. "A comparison of penalty shootout designs in soccer," 4OR, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 183-198, June.
    6. Tom P. Vandebroek & Brian T. McCann & Govert Vroom, 2018. "Modeling the Effects of Psychological Pressure on First-Mover Advantage in Competitive Interactions," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 19(5), pages 725-754, June.

  4. Sun, Ching-jen, 2015. "The bargaining correspondence: when Edgeworth meets Nash," Working Papers eco_2015_4, Deakin University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.

  5. Sun, Ching-Jen, 2008. "A note on the dynamics of incentive contracts," Working Papers eco_2008_23, Deakin University, Department of Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. James M. Malcomson, 2016. "Relational Incentive Contracts With Persistent Private Information," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 84, pages 317-346, January.
    2. Latacz-Lohmann, U. & Schilizzi, S. & Breustedt, G., 2012. "Auctioning outcome-based conservation contracts," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    3. Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe & Schilizzi, Steven & Breustedt, Gunnar, 2011. "Auctioning Outcome-Based Conservation Contracts," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114523, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).

Articles

  1. Anbarcı, Nejat & Sun, Ching-Jen & Ünver, M. Utku, 2021. "Designing practical and fair sequential team contests: The case of penalty shootouts," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 25-43.

    Cited by:

    1. Nejat Anbarci & Mehmet S. Ismail, 2022. "AI-powered mechanisms as judges: Breaking ties in chess," Papers 2210.08289, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    2. Karlsson, Niklas & Lunander, Anders, 2022. "The Strategic Jump - The Order Effect on Winning “The Final Three” in Long Jump Competitions," Working Papers 2022:8, Örebro University, School of Business.
    3. Singh, Aaditya & Scarf, Phil & Baker, Rose, 2023. "A unified theory for bivariate scores in possessive ball-sports: The case of handball," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1099-1112.
    4. Mackenzie, Andrew & Komornik, Vilmos, 2023. "Fairly taking turns," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 743-764.
    5. Brams, Steven & Ismail, Mehmet S. & Kilgour, Marc, 2023. "Fairer Shootouts in Soccer: The m-n Rule," MPRA Paper 116352, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Steven J. Brams & Mehmet S. Ismail & D. Marc Kilgour, 2023. "Fairer Shootouts in Soccer: The $m-n$ Rule," Papers 2303.04807, arXiv.org.
    7. Steven J. Brams & Mehmet S. Ismail, 2024. "Multi-Tier Tournaments: Matching and Scoring Players," Papers 2407.13845, arXiv.org.

  2. Sun, Ching-jen, 2020. "A sandwich theorem for generic n × n two person games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 86-95.

    Cited by:

    1. Pahl, Lucas, 2023. "Polytope-form games and index/degree theories for extensive-form games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 444-471.

  3. Roy, Jaideep & Silvers, Randy & Sun, Ching-Jen, 2019. "Majoritarian preference, utilitarian welfare and public information in Cournot oligopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 269-288.

    Cited by:

    1. Zheng He & Shuchen Ni & Xue Jiang & Chun Feng, 2023. "The Influence of Demand Fluctuation and Competition Intensity on Advantages of Supply Chain Dominance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.

  4. Nejat Anbarci & Richard Dutu & Ching‐Jen Sun, 2019. "On The Timing Of Production Decisions In Monetary Economies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 60(1), pages 447-472, February.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Ching-jen Sun, 2018. "The bargaining correspondence: when Edgeworth meets Nash," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 337-359, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  6. Ching-jen Sun, 2017. "Dynamic price dispersion in Bertrand–Edgeworth competition," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(1), pages 235-261, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Niloofar Fadavi, 2022. "Subgame perfect Nash equilibrium for dynamic pricing competition with finite planning horizon," Papers 2208.02842, arXiv.org.

  7. Sun Ching-Jen, 2014. "Dynamic Price Discrimination with Customer Recognition," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 14(1), pages 217-250, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Régis Chenavaz, 2017. "Better Product Quality May Lead to Lower Product Price," Post-Print hal-01590011, HAL.
    2. Laura Doval & Vasiliki Skreta, 2021. "Purchase history and product personalization," Papers 2103.11504, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.

  8. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Robustness of intermediate agreements and bargaining solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 367-376.

    Cited by:

    1. Emily Tanimura & Sylvie Thoron, 2016. "How Best to Disagree in Order to Agree?," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01704885, HAL.
    2. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
    3. Youngsub Chun, 2021. "Axioms concerning uncertain disagreement points in 2-person bargaining problems," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 6(1), pages 37-58, December.
    4. Trockel, Walter, 2014. "Robustness of intermediate agreements for the Discrete Raiffa solution," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 496, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    5. Ephraim Zehavi & Amir Leshem, 2018. "On the Allocation of Multiple Divisible Assets to Players with Different Utilities," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 52(1), pages 253-274, June.
    6. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    7. Walter Trockel, 2015. "Axiomatization of the discrete Raiffa solution," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(1), pages 9-17, April.

  9. Anbarci, Nejat & Sun, Ching-jen, 2013. "Asymmetric Nash bargaining solutions: A simple Nash program," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 211-214.

    Cited by:

    1. Bram Driesen, 2016. "Bargaining, conditional consistency, and weighted lexicographic Kalai-Smorodinsky Solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(4), pages 777-809, April.
    2. Roberto Serrano, 2020. "Sixty-Seven Years of the Nash Program: Time for Retirement?," Working Papers 2020-20, Brown University, Department of Economics.
    3. Ansolabehere, Stephen & Puy, M. Socorro, 2022. "Constitutions, federalism, and national integration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    4. Wu, Chuantao & Zhou, Dezhi & Lin, Xiangning & Sui, Quan & Wei, Fanrong & Li, Zhengtian, 2022. "A novel energy cooperation framework for multi-island microgrids based on marine mobile energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    5. Mao, Liang, 2020. "Optimal recommendation in two-player bargaining games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 41-45.
    6. Sanxi Li & Hailin Sun & Jianye Yan & Xundong Yin, 2015. "Risk aversion in the Nash bargaining problem with uncertainty," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 257-274, July.
    7. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    8. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2015. "A characterization of the asymmetric Nash solution," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(2), pages 167-171, June.
    9. Johannes Treutlein, 2023. "Modeling evidential cooperation in large worlds," Papers 2307.04879, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.

  10. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "Distributive justice and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 453-470, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2015. "The Nash solution is more utilitarian than egalitarian," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 463-478, November.
    2. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.

  11. Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "A note on the dynamics of incentive contracts," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(3), pages 645-653, August.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  12. Nejat Anbarci & Ching-jen Sun, 2011. "Weakest collective rationality and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 37(3), pages 425-429, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "No individual priorities and the Nash bargaining solution," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 855-863, May.
    2. Rachmilevitch, Shiran, 2015. "Nash bargaining with (almost) no rationality," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 107-109.
    3. NAKAMURA, Kensei, 2023. "Characterizing the Nash bargaining solution with continuity and almost no individual rationality," Discussion Papers 2023-02, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.
    4. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
    5. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2015. "A characterization of the asymmetric Nash solution," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 19(2), pages 167-171, June.
    6. Dominik Karos & Nozomu Muto & Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2018. "A generalization of the Egalitarian and the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solutions," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 47(4), pages 1169-1182, November.
    7. Osamu Mori, 2018. "Two simple characterizations of the Nash bargaining solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 225-232, August.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 13 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (7) 2009-09-26 2010-01-10 2012-12-06 2012-12-06 2015-02-11 2015-02-16 2019-07-08. Author is listed
  2. NEP-MIC: Microeconomics (6) 2008-08-14 2008-08-14 2008-08-14 2012-12-06 2012-12-06 2015-02-16. Author is listed
  3. NEP-MAC: Macroeconomics (3) 2016-08-14 2019-07-08 2019-10-28
  4. NEP-CDM: Collective Decision-Making (2) 2012-12-06 2012-12-06
  5. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (2) 2012-12-06 2015-02-16
  6. NEP-MON: Monetary Economics (2) 2016-08-14 2019-07-08
  7. NEP-SPO: Sports and Economics (2) 2015-02-11 2015-02-16
  8. NEP-BEC: Business Economics (1) 2008-08-14
  9. NEP-COM: Industrial Competition (1) 2008-08-14
  10. NEP-CTA: Contract Theory and Applications (1) 2008-08-14
  11. NEP-MKT: Marketing (1) 2008-08-14

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ching-jen Sun should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.