IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i24p4931-d1298369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Demand Fluctuation and Competition Intensity on Advantages of Supply Chain Dominance

Author

Listed:
  • Zheng He

    (School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Shuchen Ni

    (School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Xue Jiang

    (School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China)

  • Chun Feng

    (School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
    National United Engineering Laboratory of Integrated and Intelligent Transportation, Chengdu 610031, China)

Abstract

We studied a supply chain consisting of multiple suppliers and multiple retailers. We use the Cournot–Stackelberg game, the Market–Stackelberg game, and the Market–Nash game to simulate the situation where the upstream seller’s market dominance power gradually decreases while the downstream buyer’s market power increases. The equilibrium decision and supply chain performance under the three models are compared and analyzed, as well as their responses to external market changes such as demand fluctuation and market competition intensity. The research shows that (1) in a seller-dominated supply chain, the increase in buyer power reduces market equilibrium production and wholesale price; (2) in the face of strong demand fluctuations, equivalent power between upstream and downstream can contribute to the stabilization of production and wholesale prices; (3) when market demand fluctuation is small, market power brings a higher profit level, and supply chain participants would like to actively compete for market power. However, when the demand fluctuates greatly, the profit advantage brought by market dominance is no longer significant, and there is no need to spend much to fight for market dominance; (4) the fierce competition of upstream suppliers will induce upstream to give up the competition for market dominance, and make the market power less attractive to downstream retailers. While the fierce horizontal competition downstream will stimulate both suppliers and retailers to actively compete for market power, (5) sufficient market competition will improve total supply chain profit, so encouraging competition is conducive to the overall economic development of society.

Suggested Citation

  • Zheng He & Shuchen Ni & Xue Jiang & Chun Feng, 2023. "The Influence of Demand Fluctuation and Competition Intensity on Advantages of Supply Chain Dominance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4931-:d:1298369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/24/4931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yannan Jin & Qiying Hu & Sang Won Kim & Sean X. Zhou, 2019. "Supplier Development and Integration in Competitive Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(5), pages 1256-1271, May.
    2. Du, Shaofu & Sheng, Jianchao & Peng, Jing & Zhu, Yangguang, 2022. "Competitive implications of personalized pricing with a dominant retailer," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Xu Chen & Xiaojun Wang & Xinkuang Jiang, 2016. "The impact of power structure on the retail service supply chain with an O2O mixed channel," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(2), pages 294-301, February.
    4. Yue, Jinfeng & Austin, Jill & Huang, Zhimin & Chen, Bintong, 2013. "Pricing and advertisement in a manufacturer–retailer supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 492-502.
    5. Jun Zhang, 2005. "Transshipment and Its Impact on Supply Chain Members' Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1534-1539, October.
    6. Roy, Jaideep & Silvers, Randy & Sun, Ching-Jen, 2019. "Majoritarian preference, utilitarian welfare and public information in Cournot oligopoly," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 269-288.
    7. S. Chan Choi, 1991. "Price Competition in a Channel Structure with a Common Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 271-296.
    8. Tansev Geylani & Anthony J. Dukes & Kannan Srinivasan, 2007. "Strategic Manufacturer Response to a Dominant Retailer," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 164-178, 03-04.
    9. Xue, Weili & Caliskan Demirag, Ozgun & Niu, Baozhuang, 2014. "Supply chain performance and consumer surplus under alternative structures of channel dominance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 130-145.
    10. Li, Mengmeng & Mizuno, Shinji, 2022. "Dynamic pricing and inventory management of a dual-channel supply chain under different power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 273-285.
    11. Elodie Adida & Victor DeMiguel, 2011. "Supply Chain Competition with Multiple Manufacturers and Retailers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 156-172, February.
    12. Cabolis, C. & Manasakis, C. & Moreno, D. & Petrakis, E., 2021. "The interactions of R&D investments and horizontal mergers," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 507-534.
    13. C. Gizem Korpeoglu & Ersin Körpeoğlu & Soo-Haeng Cho, 2020. "Supply Chain Competition: A Market Game Approach," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5648-5664, December.
    14. Sarang Deo & Charles J. Corbett, 2009. "Cournot Competition Under Yield Uncertainty: The Case of the U.S. Influenza Vaccine Market," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 563-576, July.
    15. Charles J. Corbett & Uday S. Karmarkar, 2001. "Competition and Structure in Serial Supply Chains with Deterministic Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(7), pages 966-978, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Channel efficiency and retailer tier dominance in a supply chain with a common manufacturer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(1), pages 100-121.
    2. Xiutian Shi & Yuan Qian & Ciwei Dong, 2017. "Economic and Environmental Performance of Fashion Supply Chain: The Joint Effect of Power Structure and Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-22, June.
    3. Soo-Haeng Cho, 2014. "Horizontal Mergers in Multitier Decentralized Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 356-379, February.
    4. Fang Fang & Baojun Jiang & Jiong Sun, 2023. "Partial vertical ownership in the presence of downstream competition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(6), pages 1692-1704, June.
    5. Mao Yuan & Shi‐hua Ma & Xu Guan & Ying‐Ju Chen, 2021. "Channel configuration in a complementary market under different power structures," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 68(2), pages 157-158, March.
    6. Zhi Li & Yangyang Xu & Fumin Deng & Xuedong Liang, 2017. "Impacts of Power Structure on Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Xuyue Li, 2018. "Competing Retailers’ Environmental Investment: An Analysis under Different Power Structures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    8. Yao-Yu Wang & Jiasen Sun & Jian-Cai Wang, 2016. "Equilibrium markup pricing strategies for the dominant retailers under supply chain to chain competition," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(7), pages 2075-2092, April.
    9. Sarat Kumar Jena & Deepti Jog, 2017. "Price competition in a tourism supply chain," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(6), pages 1235-1254, September.
    10. Lee, Eunji & Minner, Stefan, 2024. "How power structure and markup schemes impact supply chain channel efficiency under price-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 297-309.
    11. Beladi, Hamid & Mukherjee, Arijit, 2012. "Market structure and strategic bi-sourcing," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 210-219.
    12. Li, Bai-Xun & Zhou, Yong-Wu & Li, Ji-zi & Zhou, Shi-ping, 2013. "Contract choice game of supply chain competition at both manufacturer and retailer levels," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 188-197.
    13. Li, Wei & Zhao, Xuan, 2022. "Competition or coopetition? Equilibrium analysis in the presence of process improvement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 180-202.
    14. Yixuan Xiao, 2020. "Horizontal Mergers under Yield Uncertainty," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 24-34, January.
    15. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Kai, Ming, 2018. "The effect of customer value and power structure on retail supply chain product choice and pricing decisions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 115-126.
    16. Luo, Zheng & Chen, Xu & Chen, Jing & Wang, Xiaojun, 2017. "Optimal pricing policies for differentiated brands under different supply chain power structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 437-451.
    17. Matsui, Kenji, 2019. "A supply chain member should set its margin later if another member's cost is highly uncertain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 127-138.
    18. Kostas Bimpikis & Ozan Candogan & Shayan Ehsani, 2019. "Supply Disruptions and Optimal Network Structures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(12), pages 5504-5517, December.
    19. Hu, Xiaoqing & Cai, Jianhu & Yue, Xiaohang, 2024. "Power structure preferences in a dual-channel supply chain: Demand information symmetry vs. asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 314(3), pages 920-934.
    20. Pranab Majumder & Ashok Srinivasan, 2008. "Leadership and Competition in Network Supply Chains," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(6), pages 1189-1204, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:24:p:4931-:d:1298369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.