IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/c/pal50.html
   My authors  Follow this author

José Carlos Rodríguez Alcantud
(Jose Carlos Rodriguez Alcantud)

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Rodríguez Alcantud, José Carlos & Laruelle, Annick, 2016. "To disqualify or not to qualify: This is the other question," IKERLANAK info:eu-repo/grantAgreeme, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Laruelle, Annick, 2018. "Collective identity functions with status quo," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 159-166.

  2. Rodríguez Alcantud, José Carlos & de Andrés Calle, Rocío & González-Arteaga, Teresa, 2013. "Codifications of complete preorders that are compatible with Mahalanobis disconsensus measures," MPRA Paper 50533, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. García-Lapresta, José Luis & Martínez-Panero, Miguel, 2024. "Two characterizations of the dense rank," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    2. González-Arteaga, T. & Alcantud, J.C.R. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2016. "A cardinal dissensus measure based on the Mahalanobis distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 575-585.

  3. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2013. "Representations of preorders by strong multi-objective functions," MPRA Paper 52329, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Pedro Hack & Daniel A. Braun & Sebastian Gottwald, 2022. "On a geometrical notion of dimension for partially ordered sets," Papers 2203.16272, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    2. Pedro Hack & Daniel A. Braun & Sebastian Gottwald, 2022. "Representing preorders with injective monotones," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 663-690, November.
    3. Pedro Hack & Daniel A. Braun & Sebastian Gottwald, 2022. "The classification of preordered spaces in terms of monotones: complexity and optimization," Papers 2202.12106, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    4. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2014. "Ordering infinite utility streams: Efficiency, continuity, and no impatience," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 33-40.

  4. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Muñoz-Torrecillas, María José, 2013. "On the measurement of sociopolitical consensus in direct democracies: Proposal of indexes," MPRA Paper 47268, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. J. C. R. Alcantud & R. Andrés Calle & J. M. Cascón, 2015. "Pairwise Dichotomous Cohesiveness Measures," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 833-854, September.

  5. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & de Andres Calle, Rocio & Cascon, José Manuel, 2012. "Approval consensus measures," MPRA Paper 39610, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María José M. Torrecillas, 2017. "Consensus measures for various informational bases. Three new proposals and two case studies from political science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 285-306, January.
    2. González-Arteaga, T. & Alcantud, J.C.R. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2016. "A cardinal dissensus measure based on the Mahalanobis distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 575-585.

  6. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Laruelle, Annick, 2012. "To approve or not to approve: this is not the only question," MPRA Paper 41885, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Marcus Pivato, 2014. "Formal utilitarianism and range voting," Post-Print hal-02979670, HAL.

  7. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2011. "Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: When can we avoid interferences?," MPRA Paper 32198, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Stan Cheung & Marco Mariotti & Roberto Veneziani, 2024. "The Hard Problem and the Tyranny of the Loser," Working Papers 971, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    2. Marco Mariotti & Roberto Veneziani, 2012. "Opportunities as chances: maximising the probability that everybody succeeds," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2012-09, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
    3. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Mariotti, Marco & Veneziani, Roberto, 2022. "Sufficientarianism," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(4), November.
      • José Carlos R. Alcantud & Marco Mariotti & Roberto Veneziani, "undated". "Sufficientarianism," Working Papers 900, Queen Mary University of London, School of Economics and Finance.
    4. Christopher P. Chambers & Siming Ye, 2023. "Haves and Have-Nots: A Theory of Economic Sufficientarianism," Papers 2301.08666, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    5. Michele Lombardi & Kaname Miyagishima & Roberto Veneziani, 2016. "Liberal Egalitarianism and the Harm Principle," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(597), pages 2173-2196, November.
    6. Mariotti, Marco & Veneziani, Roberto, 2012. "Allocating chances of success in finite and infinite societies: The utilitarian criterion," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 226-236.

  8. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2011. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," MPRA Paper 33716, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Ram Dubey & Tapan Mitra, 2014. "Combining monotonicity and strong equity: construction and representation of orders on infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 591-602, October.
    3. Michele Lombardi & Kaname Miyagishima & Roberto Veneziani, 2016. "Liberal Egalitarianism and the Harm Principle," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 126(597), pages 2173-2196, November.
    4. Henrik Petri, 2019. "Asymptotic properties of welfare relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(4), pages 853-874, June.
    5. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.

  9. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2010. "Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto-efficient and egalitarian axiomatics," MPRA Paper 20133, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2011. "Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: When can we avoid interferences?," MPRA Paper 32198, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto," MPRA Paper 27618, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    4. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Toyotaka Sakai, 2010. "Intergenerational equity and an explicit construction of welfare criteria," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 35(3), pages 393-414, September.
    6. Ram Dubey & Tapan Mitra, 2014. "Combining monotonicity and strong equity: construction and representation of orders on infinite utility streams," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(3), pages 591-602, October.
    7. Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2016. "On construction of social welfare orders satisfying Hammond equity and Weak Pareto axioms," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 119-124.
    8. Feng Feng & Yujuan Zheng & José Carlos R. Alcantud & Qian Wang, 2020. "Minkowski Weighted Score Functions of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-30, July.
    9. Dubey, Ram Sewak & Mitra, Tapan, 2014. "On construction of equitable social welfare orders on infinite utility streams," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 53-60.
    10. Ram Sewak Dubey & Tapan Mitra, 2015. "On social welfare functions on infinite utility streams satisfying Hammond Equity and Weak Pareto axioms: a complete characterization," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(2), pages 169-180, October.
    11. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    12. Sakamoto, Norihito, 2012. "Impossibilities Of Paretian Social Welfare Functions For Infinite Utility Streams With Distributive Equity," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 53(2), pages 121-130, December.
    13. Sakamoto, Norihito & 坂本, 徳仁, 2011. "Impossibilities of Paretian Social Welfare Functions for Infinite Utility Streams with Distributive Equity," Discussion Papers 2011-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

  10. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto," MPRA Paper 27618, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    2. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee & Tapan Mitra, 2021. "How stationarity contradicts intergenerational equity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 423-444, September.
    3. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2010. "Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto-efficient and egalitarian axiomatics," MPRA Paper 20133, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2016. "A Note On Social Welfare Orders Satisfying Pigou-Dalton Transfer Principle," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 57(2), pages 243-262, December.
    6. Henrik Petri, 2019. "Asymptotic properties of welfare relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 67(4), pages 853-874, June.
    7. Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2016. "On construction of social welfare orders satisfying Hammond equity and Weak Pareto axioms," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 119-124.
    8. Dubey, Ram Sewak & Mitra, Tapan, 2014. "On construction of equitable social welfare orders on infinite utility streams," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 53-60.
    9. Ram Sewak Dubey & Tapan Mitra, 2015. "On social welfare functions on infinite utility streams satisfying Hammond Equity and Weak Pareto axioms: a complete characterization," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(2), pages 169-180, October.
    10. Toyotaka Sakai, 2016. "Limit representations of intergenerational equity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 481-500, August.
    11. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    12. Sakamoto, Norihito, 2012. "Impossibilities Of Paretian Social Welfare Functions For Infinite Utility Streams With Distributive Equity," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 53(2), pages 121-130, December.
    13. Sakamoto, Norihito & 坂本, 徳仁, 2011. "Impossibilities of Paretian Social Welfare Functions for Infinite Utility Streams with Distributive Equity," Discussion Papers 2011-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

  11. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "Rational choice by two sequential criteria," MPRA Paper 21487, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Thomas DEMUYNCK, 2011. "The computational complexity of rationalizing Pareto optimal choice behavior," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven ces11.13, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    2. Au, Pak Hung & Kawai, Keiichi, 2011. "Sequentially Rationalizable Choice with Transitive Rationales," MPRA Paper 29687, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jose Apesteguia & Miguel A. Ballester, 2012. "Choice by sequential procedures," Economics Working Papers 1309, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. Demuynck, Thomas, 2011. "The computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behavior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(4-5), pages 425-433.
    5. Rohan Dutta & Sean Horan, 2015. "Inferring Rationales from Choice: Identification for Rational Shortlist Methods," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(4), pages 179-201, November.
    6. Spears Dean, 2011. "Intertemporal Bounded Rationality as Consideration Sets with Contraction Consistency," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, June.

  12. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "The compromise efficiency vs. egalitarianism among generations with an infinite horizon," MPRA Paper 22284, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    2. Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2016. "On construction of social welfare orders satisfying Hammond equity and Weak Pareto axioms," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 119-124.
    3. Ram S. Dubey & Giorgio Laguzzi, 2020. "Equitable preference relations on infinite utility streams," Papers 2012.06481, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    4. Sakamoto, Norihito, 2012. "Impossibilities Of Paretian Social Welfare Functions For Infinite Utility Streams With Distributive Equity," Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 53(2), pages 121-130, December.
    5. Sakamoto, Norihito & 坂本, 徳仁, 2011. "Impossibilities of Paretian Social Welfare Functions for Infinite Utility Streams with Distributive Equity," Discussion Papers 2011-09, Graduate School of Economics, Hitotsubashi University.

  13. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2009. "A selection of maximal elements under non-transitive indifferences," MPRA Paper 16601, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Gianni Bosi & Magalì E. Zuanon, 2017. "Maximal elements of quasi upper semicontinuous preorders on compact spaces," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 109-117, April.
    2. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2014. "Upper semicontinuous representations of interval orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 60-63.
    3. Quartieri, Federico, 2021. "Existence of maximals via right traces," MPRA Paper 107189, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  14. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Matos, Daniel L. & Palmero, Carlos R., 2009. "Goodness of fit in optimizing consumer's model," MPRA Paper 20134, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Smeulders, Bart & Crama, Yves & Spieksma, Frits C.R., 2019. "Revealed preference theory: An algorithmic outlook," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 803-815.
    2. Pawel Dziewulski, 2019. "Just-noticeable difference as a behavioural foundation of the critical cost-efficiency index," Working Paper Series 0519, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

  15. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2007. "Paretian evaluation of infinite utility streams: an egalitarian criterion," MPRA Paper 6324, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto," MPRA Paper 27618, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2013. "Fuzzy sets from the ethics of social preferences," MPRA Paper 53549, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Asheim, Geir B. & Mitra, Tapan & Tungodden, Bertil, 2006. "Sustainable recursive social welfare functions," Memorandum 18/2006, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    5. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2010. "Evaluations of infinite utility streams: Pareto-efficient and egalitarian axiomatics," MPRA Paper 20133, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2010. "The compromise efficiency vs. egalitarianism among generations with an infinite horizon," MPRA Paper 22284, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  16. Ritxar Arlegi & José C. R. Alcantud, 2006. "Ranking Sets Additively in Decisional Contexts: An Axiomatic Characterization," Documentos de Trabajo - Lan Gaiak Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra 0610, Departamento de Economía - Universidad Pública de Navarra.

    Cited by:

    1. Andreas Darmann & Christian Klamler, 2019. "Using the Borda rule for ranking sets of objects," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 399-414, October.

  17. Jose C. R. Alcantud & Ghanshyam B. Mehta, 2005. "Constructive Utility Functions on Banach spaces," Microeconomics 0502003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Michele Gori & Giulio Pianigiani, 2009. "On the Arrow-Hahn utility representation method," Working Papers - Mathematical Economics 2009-03, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.

  18. J C R Alcantud, 2004. "Maximality with or without binariness: transfer-type characterizations," Microeconomics 0402015, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, J.C.R., 2008. "Mixed choice structures, with applications to binary and non-binary optimization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3-4), pages 242-250, February.
    2. Özgür Evren, 2012. "Scalarization Methods and Expected Multi-Utility Representations," Working Papers w0174, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    3. Duggan, John, 2011. "General conditions for the existence of maximal elements via the uncovered set," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 755-759.
    4. Kukushkin, Nikolai S., 2008. "Maximizing an interval order on compact subsets of its domain," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 195-206, September.
    5. Evren, Özgür, 2014. "Scalarization methods and expected multi-utility representations," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 30-63.
    6. John Duggan, 2011. "General Conditions for Existence of Maximal Elements via the Uncovered Set," RCER Working Papers 563, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).

  19. J. C. R. Alcantud, 2003. "Stochastic demand correspondences and their aggregation properties," Microeconomics 0309001, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jan 2005.

    Cited by:

    1. Indraneel Dasgupta, 2007. "Revealed Preference with Stochastic Demand Correspondence," Discussion Papers 07/06, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.

Articles

  1. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2021. "An Operational Characterization of Soft Topologies by Crisp Topologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-12, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Riaz & Hafiz Muhammad Athar Farid & Weiwei Wang & Dragan Pamucar, 2022. "Interval-Valued Linear Diophantine Fuzzy Frank Aggregation Operators with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-36, May.

  2. Muhammad Akram & Maria Shabir & Ahmad N. Al-Kenani & José Carlos R. Alcantud & Sami Ullah Khan, 2021. "Hybrid Decision-Making Frameworks under Complex Spherical Fuzzy N-Soft Sets," Journal of Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-46, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Majed Albaity & Tahir Mahmood & Zeeshan Ali, 2023. "Impact of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Business Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Soft WASPAS Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Tahir Mahmood & Ubaid Ur Rehman & Abdul Jaleel & Jabbar Ahmmad & Ronnason Chinram, 2022. "Bipolar Complex Fuzzy Soft Sets and Their Applications in Decision-Making," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Narayanamoorthy, Samayan & Pragathi, Subramaniam & Shutaywi, Meshal & Ahmadian, Ali & Kang, Daekook, 2022. "Analysis of Vaccine efficacy during the COVID-19 pandemic period using CSF-ELECTRE-I approach," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).

  3. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2020. "Soft Open Bases and a Novel Construction of Soft Topologies from Bases for Topologies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Tareq M. Al-shami & Zanyar A. Ameen & Radwan Abu-Gdairi & Abdelwaheb Mhemdi, 2023. "On Primal Soft Topology," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Basit Ali & Naeem Saleem & Nozara Sundus & Sana Khaleeq & Muhammad Saeed & Reny George, 2022. "A Contribution to the Theory of Soft Sets via Generalized Relaxed Operations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-14, July.

  4. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2020. "Simple Majorities with Voice but No Vote," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 803-822, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Adrian Miroiu, 2021. "Majority Voting and Higher-Order Societies," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 983-999, October.

  5. José Carlos R. Alcantud & Annick Laruelle, 2020. "Independent collective identity functions as voting rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 107-119, July.

    Cited by:

    1. John Craven, 2023. "Self-designation and group allocation," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 121-133, January.

  6. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2019. "Yet another characterization of the majority rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 52-55.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2020. "Simple Majorities with Voice but No Vote," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(5), pages 803-822, October.
    2. Adrian Miroiu, 2020. "Coalitions of concerned voters: a characterization of the majority rule," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 40(4), pages 2717-2722.
    3. Mateusz Krukowski, 2023. "Majority rule as a unique voting method in elections with multiple candidates," Papers 2310.12983, arXiv.org.

  7. Xiaoyan Liu & Hee Sik Kim & Feng Feng & José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2018. "Centroid Transformations of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values Based on Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Anam Luqman & Muhammad Akram & Ahmad N. Al-Kenani, 2019. "q -Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Hypergraphs with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Mohammed Alqahtani & M. Kaviyarasu & Anas Al-Masarwah & M. Rajeshwari, 2024. "Application of Complex Neutrosophic Graphs in Hospital Infrastructure Design," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Feng Feng & Yujuan Zheng & José Carlos R. Alcantud & Qian Wang, 2020. "Minkowski Weighted Score Functions of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Gulfam Shahzadi & Muhammad Akram & Ahmad N. Al-Kenani, 2020. "Decision-Making Approach under Pythagorean Fuzzy Yager Weighted Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-20, January.

  8. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Laruelle, Annick, 2018. "Collective identity functions with status quo," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 159-166.

    Cited by:

    1. José Carlos R. Alcantud & Annick Laruelle, 2020. "Independent collective identity functions as voting rules," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 107-119, July.

  9. González-Arteaga, T. & Alcantud, J.C.R. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2016. "A cardinal dissensus measure based on the Mahalanobis distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 575-585.

    Cited by:

    1. Dombi, József & Jónás, Tamás, 2024. "Consensus measures based on a fuzzy concept," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 642-653.

  10. J. C. R. Alcantud & R. Andrés Calle & J. M. Cascón, 2015. "Pairwise Dichotomous Cohesiveness Measures," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 833-854, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Powdthavee, Nattavudh & Riyanto, Yohanes E. & Knetsch, Jack L., 2018. "Lower-rated publications do lower academics’ judgments of publication lists: Evidence from a survey experiment of economists," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 33-44.
    2. Karpov, Alexander, 2016. "Preference diversity orderings," Working Papers 0610, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    3. József Dombi & Jenő Fáró & Tamás Jónás, 2023. "A Fuzzy Entropy-Based Group Consensus Measure for Financial Investments," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Irion, Kristina & Helberger, Natali, 2017. "Smart TV and the online media sector: User privacy in view of changing market realities," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 170-184.
    5. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María José M. Torrecillas, 2017. "Consensus measures for various informational bases. Three new proposals and two case studies from political science," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 285-306, January.
    6. González-Arteaga, T. & Alcantud, J.C.R. & de Andrés Calle, R., 2016. "A cardinal dissensus measure based on the Mahalanobis distance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 575-585.

  11. García-Sanz, María D. & Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2015. "Sequential rationalization of multivalued choice," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 29-33.

    Cited by:

    1. Horan, Sean, 2016. "A simple model of two-stage choice," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 372-406.
    2. Giarlotta, Alfio & Petralia, Angelo & Watson, Stephen, 2022. "Bounded rationality is rare," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Mario Vazquez Corte, 2020. "A Model of Choice with Minimal Compromise," Papers 2010.08771, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    4. Lleras, Juan Sebastián & Masatlioglu, Yusufcan & Nakajima, Daisuke & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2017. "When more is less: Limited consideration," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 70-85.
    5. Cuhadaroglu, Tugce, 2015. "Choosing on Influence," SIRE Discussion Papers 2015-59, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    6. Domenico Cantone & Alfio Giarlotta & Stephen Watson, 2021. "Choice resolutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 56(4), pages 713-753, May.

  12. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Dubey, Ram Sewak, 2014. "Ordering infinite utility streams: Efficiency, continuity, and no impatience," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 33-40.

    Cited by:

    1. Pivato, Marcus & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2024. "Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: A survey," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Han Bleichrodt & Umut Keskin & Kirsten I. M. Rohde & Vitalie Spinu & Peter Wakker, 2015. "Discounted Utility and Present Value—A Close Relation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1420-1430, December.

  13. José Alcantud & Annick Laruelle, 2014. "Dis&approval voting: a characterization," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(1), pages 1-10, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Davide Grossi, 2021. "Lecture Notes on Voting Theory," Papers 2105.00216, arXiv.org.
    2. Pierre Dehez & Victor Ginsburgh, 2019. "Approval voting and Shapley ranking," Working Papers of BETA 2019-17, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    3. Justin Kruger & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "An Arrovian impossibility in combining ranking and evaluation," Post-Print hal-03347632, HAL.
    4. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2014. "Mean-median compromise method as an innovating voting rule in social choice theory," MPRA Paper 62938, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jan 2015.
    5. Aidan Lyon & Michael Morreau, 2018. "The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(1), pages 99-116, July.
    6. Marcus Pivato, 2016. "Asymptotic utilitarianism in scoring rule," Post-Print hal-02980107, HAL.
    7. Annick Laruelle, 2021. "“Not This One”: Experimental Use of the Approval and Disapproval Ballot," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 15-28, December.
    8. Laruelle, Annick, 2018. "Voting and expressing dissatisfaction: an experiment during the 2017 French Presidential election," IKERLANAK 25736, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.
    9. Erdamar, Bora & Sanver, M. Remzi & Sato, Shin, 2017. "Evaluationwise strategy-proofness," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 227-238.
    10. Priyanka Nagar & Pankaj Kumar Srivastava & Amit Srivastava, 2022. "A new dynamic score function approach to optimize a special class of Pythagorean fuzzy transportation problem," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(2), pages 904-913, June.
    11. Barberà, Salvador & Bossert, Walter, 2023. "Opinion aggregation: Borda and Condorcet revisited," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    12. Xiaoyan Liu & Hee Sik Kim & Feng Feng & José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2018. "Centroid Transformations of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Values Based on Aggregation Operators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-17, October.
    13. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Savadogo, Zoïnabo & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2014. "Median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking: new prospects," MPRA Paper 64731, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Sep 2014.
    14. Muhammad Mahajne & Oscar Volij, 2018. "The socially acceptable scoring rule," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 223-233, August.
    15. Macé, Antonin, 2018. "Voting with evaluations: Characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 10-17.
    16. Stéphane Gonzalez & Annick Laruelle & Philippe Solal, 2019. "Dilemma with approval and disapproval votes," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 53(3), pages 497-517, October.
    17. Martínez, Ricardo & Moreno, Bernardo, 2017. "Qualified voting systems," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 49-54.
    18. Federica Ceron & Stéphane Gonzalez, 2019. "A characterization of Approval Voting without the approval balloting assumption," Working Papers 1938, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    19. Tanya Gibbs & Henry W. Chappell, Jr., 2021. "Elections with Multiple Positive and Negative Votes," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 37-47, December.
    20. Ngoie, Ruffin-Benoît M. & Savadogo, Zoïnabo & Ulungu, Berthold E.-L., 2014. "New prospects in social choice theory: median and average as tools for measuring, electing and ranking," MPRA Paper 64155, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Dec 2014.
    21. Kurihara, Takashi, 2018. "Axiomatic characterisations of the basic best–worst rule," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 19-22.
    22. Antoinette Baujard & Herrade Igersheim & Isabelle Lebon, 2020. "Some regrettable grading scale effects under different versions of evaluative voting," Working Papers 2024, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
    23. González, Stéphane & Laruelle, Annick & Solal, Philippe, 2017. "Neutral candidates in approval and disapproval vote," IKERLANAK info:eu-repo/grantAgreeme, Universidad del País Vasco - Departamento de Fundamentos del Análisis Económico I.
    24. Antonin Macé, 2017. "Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Working Papers halshs-01222200, HAL.
    25. Muhammad Mahajne & Oscar Volij, 2017. "The Socially Acceptable Scoring Rule," Working Papers 1705, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    26. Abdelhalim El Ouafdi & Dominique Lepelley & Hatem Smaoui, 2020. "On the Condorcet efficiency of evaluative voting (and other voting rules) with trichotomous preferences," Post-Print hal-03543401, HAL.
    27. Dodge Cahan & Arkadii Slinko, 2018. "Electoral competition under best-worst voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 51(2), pages 259-279, August.
    28. Neal D. Hulkower & John Neatrour, 2019. "The Power of None," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, March.
    29. Antonin Macé, 2015. "Voting with Evaluations: When Should We Sum? What Should We Sum?," AMSE Working Papers 1544, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised 29 Oct 2015.

  14. José Carlos R. Alcantud & María D. García-Sanz, 2013. "Evaluations of Infinite Utility Streams: Pareto Efficient and Egalitarian Axiomatics," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(3), pages 432-447, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  15. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  16. José Alcantud, 2013. "Liberal approaches to ranking infinite utility streams: when can we avoid interference?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(2), pages 381-396, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  17. José Alcantud & Ritxar Arlegi, 2012. "An axiomatic analysis of ranking sets under simple categorization," SERIEs: Journal of the Spanish Economic Association, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 227-245, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Arlegi, Ritxar & Dimitrov, Dinko, 2016. "Power set extensions of dichotomous preferences," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 20-29.

  18. Alcantud, José Carlos R., 2012. "Inequality averse criteria for evaluating infinite utility streams: The impossibility of Weak Pareto," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 353-363.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  19. Alcantud, José C.R. & García-Sanz, María D., 2010. "Paretian evaluation of infinite utility streams: An egalitarian criterion," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 106(3), pages 209-211, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  20. José Alcantud, 2009. "Conditional ordering extensions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 39(3), pages 495-503, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Díaz, Susana, 2013. "Szpilrajn-type extensions of fuzzy quasiorderings," MPRA Paper 50547, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. J. C. R. Alcantud & S. Díaz, 2016. "Fuzzy preorders: conditional extensions, extensions and their representations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 371-396, December.
    3. Peter Caradonna & Christopher P. Chambers, 2023. "A Note on Invariant Extensions of Preorders," Papers 2303.04522, arXiv.org.
    4. T. Demuynck, 2009. "Common ordering extensions," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 09/593, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.

  21. José Alcantud & Ritxar Arlegi, 2008. "Ranking sets additively in decisional contexts: an axiomatic characterization," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 147-171, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  22. J. Alcantud & G. Bosi & M. Campión & J. Candeal & E. Induráin & C. Rodríguez-Palmero, 2008. "Continuous Utility Functions Through Scales," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 479-494, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Alós-Ferrer & Klaus Ritzberger, 2015. "On the characterization of preference continuity by chains of sets," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 3(2), pages 115-128, October.

  23. José Alcantud & Carlos Alós-Ferrer, 2007. "Nash equilibria for non-binary choice rules," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(3), pages 455-464, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Alcantud, J.C.R., 2008. "Mixed choice structures, with applications to binary and non-binary optimization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3-4), pages 242-250, February.
    2. Monica Patriche, 2017. "Existence of the Equilibrium in Choice," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 158-171, October.
    3. Naqvi, Nadeem, 2012. "Impossibility of interpersonal social identity diversification under binary preferences," MPRA Paper 41365, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  24. José Alcantud, 2006. "Notes and Comments: Stochastic demand correspondences and their aggregation properties," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 29(1), pages 55-69, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Indraneel Dasgupta, 2008. "Contraction consistent stochastic choice correspondence," Discussion Papers 08/04, University of Nottingham, School of Economics.
    2. Jochen Jungeilges & Tatyana Ryazanova, 2018. "Output volatility and savings in a stochastic Goodwin economy," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 355-380, December.
    3. Jan Heufer, 2011. "Stochastic revealed preference and rationalizability," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 575-592, October.

  25. Alcantud, Jose C.R., 2006. "Maximality with or without binariness: Transfer-type characterizations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 182-191, March.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  26. José Alcantud & Gianni Bosi & Carlos Palmero & Magalì Zuanon, 2006. "Mathematical utility theory and the representability of demand by continuous homogeneous functions," Portuguese Economic Journal, Springer;Instituto Superior de Economia e Gestao, vol. 5(3), pages 195-205, December.

    Cited by:

    1. José C. R. Alcantud & Carlos R. Palmero, 2010. "Complete solution of the integrability problem for homothetic demand functions," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 6(2), pages 263-271, June.
    2. José C. R. Alcantud & Susanne Fuchs-Seliger, 2007. "On integrability and aggregation of superior demand functions," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(13), pages 1-7.

  27. J. C. R. Alcantud & G. Bosi, 2003. "On the existence of certainty equivalents of various relevant types," Journal of Applied Mathematics, Hindawi, vol. 2003, pages 1-12, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Bogdan Grechuk & Anton Molyboha & Michael Zabarankin, 2012. "Mean‐Deviation Analysis in the Theory of Choice," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(8), pages 1277-1292, August.
    2. Elisa Pagani, 2015. "Certainty Equivalent: Many Meanings of a Mean," Working Papers 24/2015, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    3. Xia Han & Ruodu Wang & Qinyu Wu, 2023. "Monotonic mean-deviation risk measures," Papers 2312.01034, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.

  28. Alcantud, J. C. R., 2002. "Non-binary choice in a non-deterministic model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 117-123, September.

    Cited by:

    1. J C R Alcantud, 2004. "Maximality with or without binariness: transfer-type characterizations," Microeconomics 0402015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alcantud, J.C.R., 2008. "Mixed choice structures, with applications to binary and non-binary optimization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3-4), pages 242-250, February.
    3. J. C. R. Alcantud & Carlos Alós-Ferrer, 2002. "Choice-Nash Equilibria," Vienna Economics Papers vie0209, University of Vienna, Department of Economics.
    4. José Alcantud & Carlos Alós-Ferrer, 2007. "Nash equilibria for non-binary choice rules," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 35(3), pages 455-464, February.
    5. Matthew Ryan, 2010. "Mixture sets on finite domains," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 33(2), pages 139-147, November.

  29. J.C. R. Alcantud, 2002. "Characterization of the existence of maximal elements of acyclic relations," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 19(2), pages 407-416.

    Cited by:

    1. J C R Alcantud, 2004. "Maximality with or without binariness: transfer-type characterizations," Microeconomics 0402015, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Alcantud, J.C.R., 2008. "Mixed choice structures, with applications to binary and non-binary optimization," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3-4), pages 242-250, February.
    3. Salonen, Hannu & Vartiainen, Hannu, 2010. "On the existence of undominated elements of acyclic relations," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 217-221, November.
    4. Athanasios Andrikopoulos, 2013. "Compactness in the choice and game theories: a characterization of rationality," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 105-110, November.
    5. Gianni Bosi & Magalì E. Zuanon, 2017. "Maximal elements of quasi upper semicontinuous preorders on compact spaces," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 5(1), pages 109-117, April.
    6. John Duggan, 2011. "General Conditions for Existence of Maximal Elements via the Uncovered Set," RCER Working Papers 563, University of Rochester - Center for Economic Research (RCER).
    7. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2014. "Upper semicontinuous representations of interval orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 60-63.
    8. Athanasios Andrikopoulos, 2011. "Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities for binary relations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 13-26, January.
    9. Quartieri, Federico, 2021. "Existence of maximals via right traces," MPRA Paper 107189, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Andrikopoulos, Athanasios & Zacharias, Eleftherios, 2008. "General solutions for choice sets: The Generalized Optimal-Choice Axiom set," MPRA Paper 11645, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Alcantud, José Carlos R. & Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2009. "A selection of maximal elements under non-transitive indifferences," MPRA Paper 16601, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  30. C. Rodríguez-Palmero & J.C. R.Alcantud, 2002. "A note on representability of consumer's behavior," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 20(1), pages 207-216.

    Cited by:

    1. J. C. R. Alcantud & G. Bosi & C. Rodríguez-Palmero & M. Zuanon, 2003. "The relationship between Mathematical Utility Theory and the Integrability Problem: some arguments in favour," Microeconomics 0308002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. José C. R. Alcantud & Carlos R. Palmero, 2010. "Complete solution of the integrability problem for homothetic demand functions," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 6(2), pages 263-271, June.

  31. Alcantud, J. C. R. & Manrique, A., 2001. "Continuous representation by a money-metric function," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 365-373, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Jeongdong & Repkine, Alexandre & Hwang, Seogwon & Kim, Taiyoo, 2004. "Estimating Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for the Individual Quality Attributes with DEA," MPRA Paper 7848, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. M. Ali Khan & Edward E. Schlee, 2016. "On Lionel McKenzie's 1957 intrusion into 20th‐century demand theory," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(2), pages 589-636, May.
    3. Christopher Chambers & Takashi Hayashi, 2012. "Money-metric utilitarianism," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 39(4), pages 809-831, October.
    4. Jose C. R. Alcantud & Ghanshyam B. Mehta, 2005. "Constructive Utility Functions on Banach spaces," Microeconomics 0502003, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  32. J. C. R. Alcantud, 1999. "Topological properties of spaces ordered by preferences," International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Hindawi, vol. 22, pages 1-11, January.

    Cited by:

    1. J.C.R. Alcantud, 1999. "Weak utilities from acyclicity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 185-196, October.

  33. Alcantud, J. C. R. & Gutierrez, J. M., 1999. "Preference through indifference: a topological approach," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 543-551, May.

    Cited by:

    1. M. Ali Khan & Metin Uyan{i}k, 2018. "Topological Connectedness and Behavioral Assumptions on Preferences: A Two-Way Relationship," Papers 1810.02004, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2018.
    2. José Gutiérrez, 2014. "Preference intensity and cardinality," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(2), pages 739-748, July.

  34. Alcantud, J. C. R. & Rodriguez-Palmero, C., 1999. "Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 503-509, December.

    Cited by:

    1. J. C. R. Alcantud & G. Bosi & C. Rodríguez-Palmero & M. Zuanon, 2003. "The relationship between Mathematical Utility Theory and the Integrability Problem: some arguments in favour," Microeconomics 0308002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Athanasios Andrikopoulos & Nikolaos Sampanis, 2024. "A topological characterization of the existence of w-stable sets," Papers 2403.04512, arXiv.org.
    3. Athanasios Andrikopoulos, 2007. "A representation of consistent binary relations," Spanish Economic Review, Springer;Spanish Economic Association, vol. 9(4), pages 299-307, December.
    4. Jeanne Hagenbach & Frédéric Koessler & Eduardo Perez-Richet, 2014. "Certifiable Pre-Play Communication: Full Disclosure," Post-Print halshs-01053478, HAL.
    5. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2014. "Upper semicontinuous representations of interval orders," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 60-63.
    6. Herden, Gerhard & Levin, Vladimir L., 2012. "Utility representation theorems for Debreu separable preorders," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 148-154.
    7. Athanasios Andrikopoulos, 2011. "Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities for binary relations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 13-26, January.
    8. Bosi, Gianni & Zuanon, Magalì, 2010. "A generalization of Rader's utility representation theorem," MPRA Paper 24314, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  35. J.C.R. Alcantud, 1999. "Weak utilities from acyclicity," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 185-196, October.

    Cited by:

    1. J. C. R. Alcantud & G. Bosi & C. Rodríguez-Palmero & M. Zuanon, 2003. "The relationship between Mathematical Utility Theory and the Integrability Problem: some arguments in favour," Microeconomics 0308002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Athanasios Andrikopoulos, 2011. "Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities for binary relations," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 13-26, January.
    3. Alcantud, J. C. R. & Rodriguez-Palmero, C., 1999. "Characterization of the existence of semicontinuous weak utilities," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 503-509, December.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.