IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/zewexp/168443.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Metastudie: Chancen und Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung in Baden-Württemberg

Author

Listed:
  • Bertschek, Irene
  • Erdsiek, Daniel
  • Kesler, Reinhold
  • Niebel, Thomas
  • Rasel, Fabienne

Abstract

[Motivation und Zielsetzung der Studie] Die Digitale Transformation gilt als eine der großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit. Obgleich zahlreiche Entwicklungen nicht neu sind - Computer, Roboter, Software gibt es seit Jahrzehnten - so hat die Digitalisierung in den letzten Jahren in puncto Vielfalt und Fortschrittsgeschwindigkeit rasant zugelegt. Treiber dieser rasanten Entwicklung sind die Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT), die in Form von Breitbandinternet, mobilen Endgeräten, intelligenten Softwarealgorithmen und der Speicherung und Verarbeitung großer Datenmengen wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Prozesse verändern. Es sind die zahlreichen Dimensionen der Digitalisierung, die eine Transformation von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft zu einem komplexen Unterfangen machen und ein ständiges Abwägen zwischen Errungenschaften einerseits und Unsicherheiten über die Auswirkungen andererseits erfordern. Gleichwohl ist allen Akteuren aus Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft inzwischen klar, dass die Chancen und Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung nur dann genutzt und gemeistert wer-den können, wenn man sich diesen aktiv und gestalterisch stellt. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die Chancen und Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung für den Standort Baden-Württemberg überblicksartig herauszuarbeiten. Dabei werden folgende fünf Bereiche der Digitalisierung betrachtet: Wirtschaft, Mobilität, Bildung und Weiterbildung, Gesundheitswesen, E-Government / digitale Kommune. Als Querschnittsthemen werden Forschung, Entwicklung und Innovation, Digitale Infrastruktur, Nachhaltigkeit und Cybersicherheit betrachtet. Zu jedem Bereich werden * die Ausgangssituation allgemein auf Basis von bestehenden Studien dargestellt, * die Situation in Baden-Württemberg, soweit möglich, beleuchtet, * Stärken und Schwächen, Chancen und Herausforderungen für das Land Baden-Württemberg dargestellt und in einem Fazit zusammengefasst.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertschek, Irene & Erdsiek, Daniel & Kesler, Reinhold & Niebel, Thomas & Rasel, Fabienne, 2017. "Metastudie: Chancen und Herausforderungen der Digitalisierung in Baden-Württemberg," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 168443.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:zewexp:168443
    Note: Für das Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg - Ministerium für Inneres, Digitalisierung und Migration Baden-Württemberg - Staatsministerium Baden-Württemberg.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/168443/1/896993809.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. EFI - Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (ed.), 2017. "Gutachten zu Forschung, Innovation und technologischer Leistungsfähigkeit Deutschlands 2017," Reports on Research, Innovation and Technological Performance in Germany, Expertenkommission Forschung und Innovation (EFI) - Commission of Experts for Research and Innovation, Berlin, volume 127, number 2017, September.
    2. Joachim Ragnitz & Gerhard Heimpold & Jens Hölscher & Rainer Land & Klaus Schroeder, 2015. "25 Jahre Deutsche Einheit: eine Erfolgsgeschichte?," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 95(6), pages 375-394, June.
    3. Gottschalk, Sandra & Egeln, Jürgen & Herrmann, Frank & Hupperts, Silke & Reuss, Karsten & Köhler, Mila & Bersch, Johannes & Wagner, Simona, 2016. "Evaluation des Förderprogramms "INVEST - Zuschuss für Wagniskapital"," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 144829, June.
    4. Saam, Marianne & Viete, Steffen & Schiel, Stefan, 2016. "Digitalisierung im Mittelstand: Status Quo, aktuelle Entwicklungen und Herausforderungen," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 145963, June.
    5. Thomas Kruppe, 2011. "Arbeitsmarkt- und bildungspolitischer Handlungsbedarf," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 91(1), pages 54-56, January.
    6. Bersch, Johannes & Egeln, Jürgen & Licht, Georg, 2016. "Finanzierungsökosystem Baden-Württemberg: Analyse der Angebotsseite. Projektbericht für die L-Bank, Staatsbank für Baden-Württemberg," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 144168, June.
    7. Melanie Arntz & Terry Gregory & Ulrich Zierahn, 2016. "The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis," OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers 189, OECD Publishing.
    8. Frey, Carl Benedikt & Osborne, Michael A., 2017. "The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 254-280.
    9. Graumann, Sabine & Bertschek, Irene & Weber, Tobias & Ebert, Martin & Ettner, Karola & Speich, Anselm & Weinzierl, Michael & Ohnemus, Jörg & Niebel, Thomas & Rammer, Christian & Rasel, Fabienne & Schu, 2016. "Monitoring-Report Wirtschaft DIGITAL 2016," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 148010, June.
    10. Bertschek, Irene & Briglauer, Wolfgang & Fuest, Clemens & Kesler, Reinhold & Ohnemus, Jörg & Rammer, Christian, 2016. "Innovationspolitik in Deutschland: Maßnahmen für mehr Innovationen im Zeitalter der Digitalisierung," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 130513, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Werner Hölzl & Susanne Bärenthaler-Sieber & Julia Bock-Schappelwein & Klaus Friesenbichler & Agnes Kügler & Andreas Reinstaller & Peter Reschenhofer & Bernhard Dachs & Martin Risak, 2019. "Digitalisation in Austria. State of Play and Reform Needs," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 61892, August.
    2. Caroline Lloyd & Jonathan Payne, 2021. "Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and ‘routine’ work in the public sector," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(2), pages 109-124, March.
    3. Dario Cords & Klaus Prettner, 2022. "Technological unemployment revisited: automation in a search and matching framework [The future of work: meeting the global challenges of demographic change and automation]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(1), pages 115-135.
    4. John Burgess & Julia Connell, 2020. "New technology and work: Exploring the challenges," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 310-323, September.
    5. Emil Sundstrup & Annette Meng & Jeppe Z. N. Ajslev & Karen Albertsen & Flemming Pedersen & Lars L. Andersen, 2022. "New Technology and Loss of Paid Employment among Older Workers: Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Colombo, Emilio & Mercorio, Fabio & Mezzanzanica, Mario, 2019. "AI meets labor market: Exploring the link between automation and skills," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 27-37.
    7. Armanda Cetrulo & Dario Guarascio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2020. "Anatomy of the Italian occupational structure: concentrated power and distributed knowledge," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(6), pages 1345-1379.
    8. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Beier, Grischa & Matthess, Marcel & Shuttleworth, Luke & Guan, Ting & de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, David Iubel & Xue, Bing & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Chen, Ling, 2022. "Implications of Industry 4.0 on industrial employment: A comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Fossen, Frank M. & Sorgner, Alina, 2021. "Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 548-563.
    11. Dachs, Bernhard & Kinkel, Steffen & Jäger, Angela, 2019. "Bringing it all back home? Backshoring of manufacturing activities and the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    12. Manav Raj & Robert Seamans, 2018. "Artificial Intelligence, Labor, Productivity, and the Need for Firm-Level Data," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 553-565, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Antonio ALOISI & Valerio DE STEFANO, 2020. "Regulation and the future of work: The employment relationship as an innovation facilitator," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 159(1), pages 47-69, March.
    14. Martin, John P., 2018. "Skills for the 21st Century: Findings and Policy Lessons from the OECD Survey of Adult Skills," IZA Policy Papers 138, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Morikawa, Masayuki, 2017. "Who Are Afraid of Losing Their Jobs to Artificial Intelligence and Robots? Evidence from a Survey," GLO Discussion Paper Series 71, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Songul Tolan & Annarosa Pesole & Fernando Martinez-Plumed & Enrique Fernandez-Macias & José Hernandez-Orallo & Emilia Gomez, 2020. "Measuring the Occupational Impact of AI: Tasks, Cognitive Abilities and AI Benchmarks," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2020-02, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Lingmont, Derek N.J. & Alexiou, Andreas, 2020. "The contingent effect of job automating technology awareness on perceived job insecurity: Exploring the moderating role of organizational culture," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    18. Belloc, Filippo & Burdin, Gabriel & Cattani, Luca & Ellis, William & Landini, Fabio, 2022. "Coevolution of job automation risk and workplace governance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    19. Stepan Zemtsov, 2020. "New technologies, potential unemployment and ‘nescience economy’ during and after the 2020 economic crisis," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(4), pages 723-743, August.
    20. Damioli, G. & Van Roy, V. & Vertesy, D. & Vivarelli, M., 2021. "May AI revolution be labour-friendly? Some micro evidence from the supply side," GLO Discussion Paper Series 823, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:zewexp:168443. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zemande.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.