IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/spr/nrmpol/978-1-4939-3727-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods

Editor

Listed:
  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes
    (University of Missouri)

  • Peter W.B. Phillips
    (Univ Saskatchewan, Johnson-Shoyama Grad Sch Public Policy)

  • Justus Wesseler
    (Technische Universität München)

  • Stuart J. Smyth
    (University of Saskatchewan)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Individual chapters are listed in the "Chapters" tab

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes & Peter W.B. Phillips & Justus Wesseler & Stuart J. Smyth (ed.), 2016. "The Coexistence of Genetically Modified, Organic and Conventional Foods," Natural Resource Management and Policy, Springer, number 978-1-4939-3727-1, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nrmpol:978-1-4939-3727-1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3727-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Justus Wesseler, 2022. "The EU's farm‐to‐fork strategy: An assessment from the perspective of agricultural economics," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1826-1843, December.
    2. Vincent Smith & Justus H. H. Wesseler & David Zilberman, 2021. "New Plant Breeding Technologies: An Assessment of the Political Economy of the Regulatory Environment and Implications for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Venus, Thomas J. & Drabik, Dusan & Wesseler, Justus, 2018. "The role of a German multi-stakeholder standard for livestock products derived from non-GMO feed," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 58-67.
    4. Konstantinos Giannakas & Murray Fulton, 2020. "On the market for “Lemons”: quality provision in markets with asymmetric information," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-6, December.
    5. Savannah W. Gleim & Richard S. Gray & Stuart J. Smyth, 2020. "Forensics at the Port: Can Diagnostic Testing Benefit Trade?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Book Chapters

    The following chapters of this book are listed in IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nrmpol:978-1-4939-3727-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.