IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/iprjir/214103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Platform transience: changes in Facebook's policies, procedures, and affordances in global electoral politics

Author

Listed:
  • Barrett, Bridget
  • Kreiss, Daniel

Abstract

This paper presents two case studies of Facebook's rapid changes relating to international electoral politics: the "I'm a Voter" affordance and the platform's data and targeting capabilities. The article shows how Facebook changed with respect to its policies, procedures, and affordances, especially given the normative pressure exerted by journalists. Drawing from these case studies, we conceptualise continual and rapid change as "platform transience" and argue that it often arises from external pressure and economic considerations. Platform transience has significant implications for the ability of stakeholders to hold platforms accountable, raises significant issues for electoral fairness, and increases the potential for unequal political information environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrett, Bridget & Kreiss, Daniel, 2019. "Platform transience: changes in Facebook's policies, procedures, and affordances in global electoral politics," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214103
    DOI: 10.14763/2019.4.1446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/214103/1/IntPolRev-2019-4-1446.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14763/2019.4.1446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Chester, Jeff & Montgomery, Kathryn C., 2017. "The role of digital marketing in political campaigns," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 6(4), pages 1-20.
    3. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27, Center for Open Science.
    4. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "What is Platform Governance?," SocArXiv fbu27_v1, Center for Open Science.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Konrad Degen & Alexander Gleiss, 2025. "Time to break up? The case for tailor-made digital platform regulation based on platform-governance standard types," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Wu, Mian & Liu, Yulong & Chung, Henry F.L. & Guo, Shoujia, 2022. "When and how mobile payment platform complementors matter in cross-border B2B e-commerce ecosystems? An integration of process and modularization analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 843-854.
    4. Gorwa, Robert, 2019. "The platform governance triangle: conceptualising the informal regulation of online content," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(2), pages 1-22.
    5. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    6. Sanna Malinen, 2021. "Boundary Control as Gatekeeping in Facebook Groups," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 73-81.
    7. Hyungjun Seo & Seunghwan Myeong, 2021. "Determinant Factors for Adoption of Government as a Platform in South Korea: Mediating Effects on the Perception of Intelligent Information Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Gorwa, Robert, 2021. "Elections, institutions, and the regulatory politics of platform governance: The case of the German NetzDG," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(6).
    9. Wu, Mian & (David) Liu, Yulong & Jasimuddin, Sajjad M. & (Justin) Zhang, Zuopeng, 2023. "Rethinking cross-border mobile payment ecosystems: A process study of mobile payment platform complementors, network effect holes and ecosystem modules," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    10. Poell, Thomas & Nieborg, David & van Dijck, José, 2019. "Platformisation," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 8(4), pages 1-13.
    11. Kyungmoo Heo & Sangyoon Yi, 2023. "(De)centralization in the governance of blockchain systems: cryptocurrency cases," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(3), pages 59-82, September.
    12. Yu Zeng & Quan Zhang & Qi Zhao & Huang Huang, 2023. "Doing more among institutional boundaries: Platform‐enabled government in China," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(3), pages 458-478, May.
    13. Ya-Lan Chin & Feng-Shang Wu & Jian-Bing Liu & Yan Li & Jin Wang, 2024. "Exploring the role of interaction in older-adult service innovation: insights from the testing stage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Griffin, Rachel, 2022. "New school speech regulation as a regulatory strategy against hate speech on social media: The case of Germany's NetzDG," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(9).
    15. Cowls, Josh & Morley, Jessica & Floridi, Luciano, 2023. "App store governance: Implications, limitations, and regulatory responses," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(1).
    16. Rocco Bellanova & Marieke de Goede, 2022. "Co‐Producing Security: Platform Content Moderation and European Security Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1316-1334, September.
    17. Sanna Malinen, 2021. "Boundary Control as Gatekeeping in Facebook Groups," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 73-81.
    18. Gorwa, Robert, 2024. "The Politics of Platform Regulation: How Governments Shape Online Content Moderation," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 299876.
    19. Luis Bouza García & Alvaro Oleart, 2023. "Regulating Disinformation and Big Tech in the EU: A Research Agenda on the Institutional Strategies, Public Spheres and Analytical Challenges," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/365881, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    20. Akon E. Ekpo & Jenna Drenten & Pia A. Albinsson & Sophia Anong & Samuelson Appau & Lagnajita Chatterjee & Charlene A. Dadzie & Margaret Echelbarger & Adrienne Muldrow & Spencer M. Ross & Shelle Santan, 2022. "The platformed money ecosystem: Digital financial platforms, datafication, and reimagining financial well‐being," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 1062-1078, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iprjir:214103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://policyreview.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.