IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/market/v25y2013i1p37-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship learning as a dimension of relationship quality: tentative evidence from transnational buyer-supplier relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Matevž Rašković

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana)

  • Maja Makovec Brenčić

    (Faculty of Economics, University of Ljubljana)

  • Anuška Ferligoj

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana)

  • Jan C. Fransoo

    (School of Industrial Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology)

Abstract

While relationship learning has been addressed in marketing theory, it has not yet been explored as a possible dimension of the second-order construct of relationship quality (RQ). This construct has so far been mostly conceptualized to consist of trust and commitment, sometimes also satisfaction; however, some see the latter more as a consequence of the former two. Additionally, while RQ and its multidimensionality have been researched in the marketing literature, this area has remained virtually unexplored in the supply and operations management literature. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the multidimensional nature of the second-order construct of RQ in a particular setting of transnational corporation (TNC) buyer-supplier relationships. Our paper aims to determine if relationship learning can be considered an important dimension of RQ, alongside trust and commitment. In our study of relationship learning, we follow Jean, Sinkovics and Kim (2010) and Jean and Sinkovics (2010), who have focused on the governance aspect of relationship learning in managing supply performance outcomes. We employ an indirect testing approach by testing RQ as a second-order reflective construct comprised of trust, commitment and relationship within a simple variance-based Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Our results confirm that relationship learning is an important dimension of the second-order construct of RQ. This was done on a tentative sample of 11 TNC purchasing managers and 55 evaluated suppliers, albeit with some research limitations which we acknowledge. Our research calls for additional cross-validation of our tentative results.

Suggested Citation

  • Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčić & Anuška Ferligoj & Jan C. Fransoo, 2013. "Relationship learning as a dimension of relationship quality: tentative evidence from transnational buyer-supplier relationships," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 25(1), pages 37-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:25:y:2013:i:1:p:37-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/153051
    Download Restriction: None
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fynes, Brian & de Burca, Sean & Mangan, John, 2008. "The effect of relationship characteristics on relationship quality and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 56-69, January.
    2. Dario Miočević, 2011. "Key Supplier Relationship Management: The Case of Croatian Medium-Sized and Large Manufacturing Companies," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 23(1), pages 27-44.
    3. Bruce Kogut & Udo Zander, 1993. "Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 24(4), pages 625-645, December.
    4. B Kogut & U Zander, 2003. "A memoir and reflection: knowledge and an evolutionary theory of the multinational firm 10 years later," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 34(6), pages 505-515, November.
    5. Fynes, Brian & Voss, Chris & de Burca, Sean, 2005. "The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 339-354, June.
    6. Boris Snoj & Borut Milfelner, 2010. "Internal and external market orientation as organizational resources - consequences for market and financial performance," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 22(2), pages 223-241.
    7. Otto, Andreas & Kotzab, Herbert, 2003. "Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 306-320, January.
    8. Liu, Yi & Li, Yuan & Zhang, Leinan, 2010. "Control mechanisms across a buyer-supplier relationship quality matrix," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 3-12, January.
    9. Tang, Ou & Nurmaya Musa, S., 2011. "Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 25-34, September.
    10. Blome, Constantin & Schoenherr, Tobias, 2011. "Supply chain risk management in financial crises--A multiple case-study approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 43-57, November.
    11. Arnold Schuh, 2010. "How research on marketing in Central and Eastern Europe can advance international marketing theory," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 22(2), pages 255-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčič, 2015. "The Trust-Committment-Flexibility Link in Transnational Buyer-Supplier Relationships: A Network Perspective," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 7-19.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiengarten, Frank & Humphreys, Paul & Gimenez, Cristina & McIvor, Ronan, 2016. "Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P3), pages 361-370.
    2. Rika Ampuh Hadiguna, 2012. "Decision support framework for risk assessment of sustainable supply chain," International Journal of Logistics Economics and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1/2), pages 35-54.
    3. Dekkers, Rob & de Boer, Ronald & Gelsomino, Luca Mattia & de Goeij, Christiaan & Steeman, Michiel & Zhou, Qijun & Sinclair, Scott & Souter, Victoria, 2020. "Evaluating theoretical conceptualisations for supply chain and finance integration: A Scottish focus group," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    4. Joshua K Ault & Aloysius Newenham-Kahindi & Sanjay Patnaik, 2021. "Trevino and Doh’s discourse-based view: Do we need a new theory of internationalization?," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(7), pages 1394-1406, September.
    5. Matevž Rašković & Maja Makovec Brenčič, 2015. "The Trust-Committment-Flexibility Link in Transnational Buyer-Supplier Relationships: A Network Perspective," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 27(1), pages 7-19.
    6. Maximilian Palmié & Marco Zeschky & Stephan Winterhalter & Philipp Walter Sauter & Naomi Haefner & Oliver Gassmann, 2016. "Coordination mechanisms for international innovation in SMEs: effects on time-to-market and R&D task complexity as a moderator," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 273-294, February.
    7. Yu-Hsien Lin & Nisha Kulangara & Krista Foster & Jennifer Shang, 2020. "Improving Green Market Orientation, Green Supply Chain Relationship Quality, and Green Absorptive Capacity to Enhance Green Competitive Advantage in the Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Hallikas, Jukka & Lintukangas, Katrina, 2016. "Purchasing and supply: An investigation of risk management performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 487-494.
    9. Kauppi, Katri & Longoni, Annachiara & Caniato, Federico & Kuula, Markku, 2016. "Managing country disruption risks and improving operational performance: risk management along integrated supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 484-495.
    10. Xiaohua Yang & Siri Terjesen, 2007. "In search of confidence: Context, collaboration, and constraints," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 497-507, December.
    11. Elitsa R Banalieva & Charles Dhanaraj, 2019. "Internalization theory for the digital economy," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(8), pages 1372-1387, October.
    12. Munir, Manal & Jajja, Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq & Chatha, Kamran Ali & Farooq, Sami, 2020. "Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Gisele de Campos Ribeiro & Carole Donada & Caroline Mothe & Gwenaëlle Nogatchewsky, 2019. "The Respective Effects of Virtues and Inter-Organizational Management Control Systems on Relationship Quality and Performance: Virtues Win," Post-Print hal-01700970, HAL.
    14. Carole Donada & Caroline Mothe & Gwenaëlle Nogatchewsky & Gisele Campos Ribeiro, 2019. "The Respective Effects of Virtues and Inter-organizational Management Control Systems on Relationship Quality and Performance: Virtues Win," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 211-228, January.
    15. Lees, Nic & Nuthall, Peter & Wilson, Mark M.J., 2020. "Relationship quality and supplier performance in food supply chains," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    16. Nakano, Mikihisa & Akikawa, Takuya, 2014. "Literature review of empirical studies on SCM using the SSPP paradigm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 35-45.
    17. Ualison Rébula Oliveira & Camila Oliveira Santos & Gabriel Elias Lunz Chaves & Vicente Aprigliano Fernandes, 2022. "Analysis of the MORT method applicability for risk management in supply chains," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1361-1382, December.
    18. Chen, Yi-Su & Su, Hung-Chung & Ro, Young K., 2017. "The co-evolution of supplier relationship quality and product quality in the U.S. auto industry: A cultural perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 245-255.
    19. Santanu Mandal & Rathin Sarathy, 2018. "The Effect of Supply Chain Relationships on Resilience: Empirical Evidence from India," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(3_suppl), pages 196-217, June.
    20. Pinior, Beate & Conraths, Franz J. & Petersen, Brigitte & Selhorst, Thomas, 2015. "Decision support for risks managers in the case of deliberate food contamination: The dairy industry as an example," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 41-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:market:v:25:y:2013:i:1:p:37-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tanja Komarac (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.