IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jikmxx/v18y2019i04ns0219649219500382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Social Community Value Creation: An Exploratory Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Chien-Hsing Wu

    (Department of Information Management, National University of Kaohsiung, 700, Kaohsiung University Road, Nanzih District, Kaohsiung 811, Taiwan, R. O. China)

  • Chuan-Chun Wu

    (Department of Information Management, I-Shou University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Syuecheng Road, Dashu District, Kaohsiung City 84001, Taiwan, R. O. China)

Abstract

Based on the Value–Belief–Norm Theory (VBNT), an exploratory study is conducted that proposes a research model to describe the social community value creation. The proposed model is examined via empirical survey. The mediation effect of community beliefs is also explored. The model considers extrinsic perceived value (EPV), intrinsic perceived value (IPV), and biospheric perceived value (BPV) as the main determinants of value creation behaviour for online communities. Results from the analysis of 335 valid community users are obtained. The intrinsic perceived value is significantly associated with the value creation attitude (VCA) towards intention, implying that community users, thus far, likely appreciate such intrinsic effect of community as participation and sentiment values. The beliefs partially mediate the effect of IPV on value creation behaviour. Active behaviour in public issues and private behaviour in the community are because of the perceived participation value, whereas non-active behaviour in public issues is due to the perceived network value in online community. Trust and norm alternate no effect of IPV on value creation attitude towards active and non-active behaviours in public issues and private behaviour in the community. This draws attention to the idea that beliefs probably have interplay effect on the value creation behaviour. This study serves as a theoretical and practical groundwork for researches on value development of virtual society with a focus on the effects of EPV, IPV, and BPV. Discussions and implications are also addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chien-Hsing Wu & Chuan-Chun Wu, 2019. "Determinants of Social Community Value Creation: An Exploratory Empirical Study," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1-26, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:18:y:2019:i:04:n:s0219649219500382
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219649219500382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219649219500382
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219649219500382?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hamilton, Mitchell & Kaltcheva, Velitchka D. & Rohm, Andrew J., 2016. "Social Media and Value Creation: The Role of Interaction Satisfaction and Interaction Immersion," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 121-133.
    2. Leyden, Dennis P. & Link, Albert N. & Siegel, Donald S., 2014. "A theoretical analysis of the role of social networks in entrepreneurship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1157-1163.
    3. Susanna Slotte–Kock & Nicole Coviello, 2010. "Entrepreneurship Research on Network Processes: A Review and Ways Forward," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 34(1), pages 31-57, January.
    4. Gebauer, Johannes & Füller, Johann & Pezzei, Roland, 2013. "The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1516-1527.
    5. Hudson, Simon & Roth, Martin S. & Madden, Thomas J. & Hudson, Rupert, 2015. "The effects of social media on emotions, brand relationship quality, and word of mouth: An empirical study of music festival attendees," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 68-76.
    6. Seraj, Mina, 2012. "We Create, We Connect, We Respect, Therefore We Are: Intellectual, Social, and Cultural Value in Online Communities," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 209-222.
    7. Hajli, M. Nick, 2014. "The role of social support on relationship quality and social commerce," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 17-27.
    8. Storbacka, Kaj & Brodie, Roderick J. & Böhmann, Tilo & Maglio, Paul P. & Nenonen, Suvi, 2016. "Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 3008-3017.
    9. Ramaswamy, Venkat & Ozcan, Kerimcan, 2018. "What is co-creation? An interactional creation framework and its implications for value creation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 196-205.
    10. Ojea, Elena & Loureiro, Maria L., 2007. "Altruistic, egoistic and biospheric values in willingness to pay (WTP) for wildlife," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 807-814, September.
    11. Arnett, Dennis B. & Wittmann, C. Michael, 2014. "Improving marketing success: The role of tacit knowledge exchange between sales and marketing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 324-331.
    12. Tsai, Yuan-Hui & Ma, Hwa-Chun & Lin, Chieh-Peng & Chiu, Chou-Kang & Chen, Shwu-Chuan, 2014. "Group social capital in virtual teaming contexts: A moderating role of positive affective tone in knowledge sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 13-20.
    13. Cavalcanti, Carina & Engel, Stefanie & Leibbrandt, Andreas, 2013. "Social integration, participation, and community resource management," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 262-276.
    14. Thais Elaine Vick & Marcelo Seido Nagano, 2018. "Preconditions for Successful Knowledge Creation in the Context of Academic Innovation Projects," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(01), pages 1-22, March.
    15. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    16. Kwangsu Cho & Sehee Han & Ting-Ting Rachel Chung & Patrick J. Bateman, 2017. "The Influence of an Integrated View of Source’s Expertise on Knowledge Transfer," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Chen, Aihui & Lu, Yaobin & Wang, Bin & Zhao, Ling & Li, Ming, 2013. "What drives content creation behavior on SNSs? A commitment perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2529-2535.
    18. Naresh K. Malhotra & Sung S. Kim & Ashutosh Patil, 2006. "Common Method Variance in IS Research: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches and a Reanalysis of Past Research," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(12), pages 1865-1883, December.
    19. von Krogh, Georg & Geilinger, Nina, 2014. "Knowledge creation in the eco-system: Research imperatives," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 155-163.
    20. Corsaro, Daniela, 2019. "Capturing the broader picture of value co-creation management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 99-116.
    21. Camps, Susanna & Marques, Pilar, 2014. "Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: The role of innovation enablers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 325-348.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schweitzer, Fiona & Mai, Robert, 2022. "Does one rotten apple always spoil the barrel? The role of perceptions of empowerment when consumers observe destructive others in online co-creation activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 436-446.
    2. Liu, He & Li, Xuerong & Wang, Shouyang, 2021. "A bibliometric analysis of 30 years of platform research: Developing the research agenda for platforms, the associated technologies and social impacts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    3. Kamboj, Shampy & Sarmah, Bijoylaxmi & Gupta, Shivam & Dwivedi, Yogesh, 2018. "Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of Stimulus-Organism-Response," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 169-185.
    4. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    5. Hu, Miao & Chen, Jie & Chen, Qimei & He, Wei, 2020. "It pays off to be authentic: An examination of direct versus indirect brand mentions on social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 19-28.
    6. Schweisfurth, Tim G. & Raasch, Christina, 2015. "Embedded lead users—The benefits of employing users for corporate innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 168-180.
    7. Eric Stevens & Ronald Boucher, 2020. "Designing Co-Creation Platforms: The Case of Configurators Toolkits," Post-Print hal-02872485, HAL.
    8. Hsieh, Sara H. & Chang, Aihwa, 2016. "The Psychological Mechanism of Brand Co-creation Engagement," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 13-26.
    9. Julia Troll & Ivo Blohm & Jan Marco Leimeister, 2019. "Why Incorporating a Platform-Intermediary can Increase Crowdsourcees’ Engagement," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 61(4), pages 433-450, August.
    10. Zhichao Cheng & Tongfei Gu & Cui Li, 2022. "The Formation Mechanism of Social Identity Based on Knowledge Contribution in Online Knowledge Communities: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, February.
    11. Hsin-Hui Chou & Chao-Chin Huang & Pei-Yun Tu, 2023. "Towards becoming a service-dominant enterprise: an actor engagement perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 607-632, June.
    12. Al-Tabbaa, Omar & Ankrah, Samuel, 2016. "Social capital to facilitate ‘engineered’ university–industry collaboration for technology transfer: A dynamic perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Yang, Mu & Han, Chunjia, 2021. "Stimulating innovation: Managing peer interaction for idea generation on digital innovation platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 456-465.
    14. Ghasemaghaei, Maryam & Calic, Goran, 2020. "Assessing the impact of big data on firm innovation performance: Big data is not always better data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 147-162.
    15. Leone, Daniele & Schiavone, Francesco & Appio, Francesco Paolo & Chiao, Benjamin, 2021. "How does artificial intelligence enable and enhance value co-creation in industrial markets? An exploratory case study in the healthcare ecosystem," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 849-859.
    16. Loureiro, Sandra Maria Correia & Romero, Jaime & Bilro, Ricardo Godinho, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 388-409.
    17. Barbara Neuhofer & Bianca Magnus & Krzysztof Celuch, 2021. "The impact of artificial intelligence on event experiences: a scenario technique approach," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(3), pages 601-617, September.
    18. Chaney, Damien, 2019. "A principal–agent perspective on consumer co-production: Crowdfunding and the redefinition of consumer power," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 74-84.
    19. Dineva, Denitsa & Breitsohl, Jan & Garrod, Brian & Megicks, Philip, 2020. "Consumer Responses to Conflict-Management Strategies on Non-Profit Social Media Fan Pages," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 118-136.
    20. Ghasemaghaei, Maryam & Calic, Goran, 2019. "Does big data enhance firm innovation competency? The mediating role of data-driven insights," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 69-84.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jikmxx:v:18:y:2019:i:04:n:s0219649219500382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jikm/jikm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.