IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v20y2016i08ns1363919616400168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Startup Communication For Opportunity Recognition — An Approach To Identify Future Product Trends

Author

Listed:
  • HAUKE SIMON

    (Institute of Business Administration at the Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy of the University of Münster, Germany)

  • JENS LEKER

    (Institute of Business Administration at the Department of Chemistry and Pharmacy of the University of Münster, Germany)

Abstract

A company’s ability to recognise early-stage opportunities and to understand the dynamics of emerging markets determines the success or failure of new products. Particularly the emergence of new information technology and social media networks provide ample opportunities to leverage a massive amount of data for managerial purposes. However, managers still meet using social media with skepticism and it is not fully understood how to make use of this information for new product development. We introduce a new method on how to use large-scale internet data as a complement to traditional approaches (patent or publication analysis and surveys) to overcome their shortcomings in terms of speed, dynamic and expense to conduct. More specifically, we propose that social media communication of startups can give valuable indications about future product trends especially in rapidly developing fields. Our approach measures the awareness of startups — and their products — as the increase of the communication about the startup on Twitter. Startup communication is a particularly well-suited indicator because startups develop new-to-the-world products or are in the development process. We illustrate our approach by analysing the communication of 545 startups. On a holistic level we determine industry trends. Fintech is among the topics that increase significantly in relevance. We determine more specific categories within the industries by applying cosine-similarity metrics and hierarchical cluster analysis. Subsequently we determine NPD relevant trends by the increase of retweets within these categories. The growing customer awareness of these clusters shows newly evolving customer needs. Incumbents may use this information to adjust to their current portfolio or to find collaboration partners to best meet upcoming challenges and opportunities. We think that the approach can be transferred to a multitude of fields, helping with the analysis of emerging fields and with early stage opportunity recognition.

Suggested Citation

  • Hauke Simon & Jens Leker, 2016. "Using Startup Communication For Opportunity Recognition — An Approach To Identify Future Product Trends," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(08), pages 1-22, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:20:y:2016:i:08:n:s1363919616400168
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919616400168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919616400168
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919616400168?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sima Sedighadeli & Reza Kachouie, 2013. "Managerial Factors Influencing Success Of New Product Development," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(05), pages 1-23.
    2. Oe, Akitsu & Mitsuhashi, Hitoshi, 2013. "Founders' experiences for startups' fast break-even," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(11), pages 2193-2201.
    3. Ardichvili, Alexander & Cardozo, Richard & Ray, Sourav, 2003. "A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 105-123, January.
    4. Robert T. Keller, 2004. "A Resource-Based Study Of New Product Development: Predicting Five-Year Later Commercial Success And Speed To Market," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 243-260.
    5. Volker Bilgram & Alexander Brem & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "User-centric Innovations in New Product Development — Systematic Identification of Lead Users Harnessing Interactive and Collaborative Online-tools," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Alexander Brem & Joe Tidd & Tugrul Daim (ed.), Managing Innovation Understanding and Motivating Crowds, chapter 7, pages 173-212, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Kaplan, Andreas M. & Haenlein, Michael, 2010. "Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 59-68, January.
    7. An, Hyoung Joon & Ahn, Sang-Jin, 2016. "Emerging technologies—beyond the chasm: Assessing technological forecasting and its implication for innovation management in Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 132-142.
    8. Talia Bar, 2006. "Defensive Publications in an R&D Race," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 229-254, March.
    9. Mann, Ronald J. & Sager, Thomas W., 2007. "Patents, venture capital, and software start-ups," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 193-208, March.
    10. Christian Sternitzke & Isumo Bergmann, 2009. "Similarity measures for document mapping: A comparative study on the level of an individual scientist," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(1), pages 113-130, January.
    11. Christofer Laurell & Christian Sandström, 2014. "Disruption And Social Media — Entrant Firms As Institutional Entrepreneurs," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-17.
    12. Katia Angue & Cécile Ayerbe & Liliana Mitkova, 2014. "A method using two dimensions of the patent classification for measuring the technological proximity: an application in identifying a potential R&D partner in biotechnology," Post-Print halshs-00925820, HAL.
    13. Fischer, Eileen & Reuber, A. Rebecca, 2011. "Social interaction via new social media: (How) can interactions on Twitter affect effectual thinking and behavior?," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
    15. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    16. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 287-343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Popma, W.T. & Waarts, E. & Wierenga, B., 2003. "New Product Announcements as Market Signals. A content analysis in the DRAM chip industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2003-025-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    18. Danuta De Grosbois & Uma Kumar & Vinod Kumar, 2010. "Internet-Based Technology Use And New Product Time-To-Market: The Moderating Effect Of Product Innovativeness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(05), pages 915-946.
    19. Rogers, Everett M, 1976. "New Product Adoption and Diffusion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 290-301, March.
    20. Wolfgang Glänzel & Balázs Schlemmer & Bart Thijs, 2003. "Better late than never? On the chance to become highly cited only beyond the standard bibliometric time horizon," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 58(3), pages 571-586, November.
    21. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2015. "Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 247-259.
    22. Miguel Linhares Pinheiro & Cândida Lucas & José Carlos Pinho, 2015. "Social Network Analysis As A New Methodological Tool To Understand University–Industry Cooperation," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-22.
    23. Gunter Festel, 2015. "Similarities Of Successful Technology Transfer Through New Ventures," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(02), pages 1-35.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonid Gokhberg & Ilya Kuzminov & Pavel Bakhtin & Elena Tochilina & Alexander Chulok & Anton Timofeev & Alina Lavrinenko, 2017. "Big-Data-Augmented Approach to Emerging Technologies Identification: Case of Agriculture and Food Sector," HSE Working papers WP BRP 76/STI/2017, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    2. Mota, Renata de Oliveira & Godinho Filho, Moacir & Osiro, Lauro & Ganga, Gilberto Miller Devós & Mendes, Glauco Henrique de Sousa, 2021. "Unveiling the relationship between drivers and capabilities for reduced time-to-market in start-ups: A multi-method approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    3. Geissinger, Andrea & Laurell, Christofer & Öberg, Christina & Sandström, Christian, 2023. "Social media analytics for innovation management research: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    4. Martin P. Allmendinger & Elisabeth S. C. Berger, 2019. "Selecting Corporate Firms For Collaborative Innovation: Entrepreneurial Decision Making In Asymmetric Partnerships," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(01), pages 1-34, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. H. Simon & N. Sick, 2016. "Technological distance measures: new perspectives on nearby and far away," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1299-1320, June.
    2. Ad van den Oord & Arjen van Witteloostuijn, 2018. "A multi-level model of emerging technology: An empirical study of the evolution of biotechnology from 1976 to 2003," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Thu-Hang Hoang & Nhi Pham Phuong Nguyen & Nhu-Y Ngoc Hoang & Mohammadreza Akbari & Huy Truong Quang & An Duong Thi Binh, 2023. "Application of social media in supply chain 4.0 practices: a bibliometric analysis and research trends," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1162-1184, September.
    4. de Rassenfosse, Gaétan, 2013. "Do firms face a trade-off between the quantity and the quality of their inventions?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1072-1079.
    5. Florent Silve & Alexander Plekhanov, 2018. "Institutions, innovation and growth : Evidence from industry data," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 26(3), pages 335-362, July.
    6. Adam Jaffe & Manuel Trajtenberg, 1999. "International Knowledge Flows: Evidence From Patent Citations," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1-2), pages 105-136.
    7. Ernest Miguélez & Rosina Moreno, 2013. "Do Labour Mobility and Technological Collaborations Foster Geographical Knowledge Diffusion? The Case of European Regions," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 321-354, June.
    8. Jakob B. Madsen, 2008. "Economic Growth, TFP Convergence and the World Export of Ideas: A Century of Evidence," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 110(1), pages 145-167, March.
    9. Per Botolf Maurseth, 2005. "Lovely but dangerous: The impact of patent citations on patent renewal," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 351-374.
    10. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    11. Cristiano, Antonelli & Scellato, Giuseppe, 2007. "Complexity and Innovation: Social Interactions and Firm Level Total Factor Productivity," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 200709, University of Turin.
    12. Langley, David J. & Hoeve, Maarten C. & Ortt, J. Roland & Pals, Nico & van der Vecht, Bob, 2014. "Patterns of Herding and their Occurrence in an Online Setting," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-25.
    13. Figueroa, Nicolás & Serrano, Carlos J., 2019. "Patent trading flows of small and large firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1601-1616.
    14. Krafft Jackie & Quatraro Francesco & Colombelli Alessandra, 2011. "High Growth Firms and Technological Knowledge: Do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies?," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201114, University of Turin.
    15. Nadia Ayari & Szabolcs Blazsek & Pedro Mendi, 2012. "Renewable energy innovations in Europe: a dynamic panel data approach," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(24), pages 3135-3147, August.
    16. Blomkvist, Katarina & Kappen, Philip & Zander, Ivo, 2014. "Superstar inventors—Towards a people-centric perspective on the geography of technological renewal in the multinational corporation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 669-682.
    17. John Van Reenen & Rupert Harrison & Rachel Griffith, 2006. "How Special Is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of U.S. R&D Spillovers on U.K. Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(5), pages 1859-1875, December.
    18. Michele Cincera, 2005. "Firms' productivity growth and R&D spillovers: An analysis of alternative technological proximity measures," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(8), pages 657-682.
    19. Sharon Belenzon & Tomer Berkovitz, 2010. "Innovation in Business Groups," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 519-535, March.
    20. Dirk Czarnitzki & Julie Delanote, 2015. "R&D policies for young SMEs: input and output effects," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(3), pages 465-485, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:20:y:2016:i:08:n:s1363919616400168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.