IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/igtrxx/v06y2004i03ns0219198904000253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Long Run Outcomes And Global Dynamics Of A Duopoly Game With Misspecified Demand Functions

Author

Listed:
  • GIAN-ITALO BISCHI

    (Istituto di Scienze Economiche, University of Urbino, via Saffi n.42, I-61029 Urbino, Italy)

  • CARL CHIARELLA

    (School of Finance and Economics, University of Technology Sydney, P.O. Box 123, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • MICHAEL KOPEL

    (Department of Managerial Economics and Industrial Organization, University of Technology, Theresianumgasse 27, A-1040 Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

In this paper we study a model of a quantity-setting duopoly market where firms lack knowledge of the market demand. Using a misspecified demand function firms determine their profit-maximizing choices of their corresponding perceived market game. For illustrative purposes we assume that the (true) demand function is linear and that the reaction functions of the players are quadratic. We then investigate the global dynamics of this game and characterize the number of steady states and their welfare properties. We study the basins of attraction of these steady states and present situations in which global bifurcations of their basins occur when model parameters are varied. The economic significance of our result is to show that in situations where players choose their actions based on a misspecified model of the environment, additional self-confirming steady states may emerge, despite the fact that the Nash-equilibrium of the game under perfect knowledge is unique. As a consequence the long run outcome of the game and overall welfare is highly dependent upon initial conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Gian-Italo Bischi & Carl Chiarella & Michael Kopel, 2004. "The Long Run Outcomes And Global Dynamics Of A Duopoly Game With Misspecified Demand Functions," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 343-379.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:06:y:2004:i:03:n:s0219198904000253
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219198904000253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219198904000253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219198904000253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Levine, David, 1998. "Learning in games," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-5), pages 631-639, May.
    2. Binmore, Ken & McCarthy, John & Ponti, Giovanni & Samuelson, Larry & Shaked, Avner, 2002. "A Backward Induction Experiment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 48-88, May.
    3. N/A, 2002. "List of Journals," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(4), pages 332-341, October.
    4. van Damme, E.E.C., 2002. "Vertrouwen en zelfverrijking," Other publications TiSEM 7239103a-3d40-40f3-8691-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Medio,Alfredo & Lines,Marji, 2001. "Nonlinear Dynamics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521551861, September.
    6. Unknown, 2002. "REVIEWERS, July 2001-July 2002," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 34(3), pages 1-1, December.
    7. Medio,Alfredo & Lines,Marji, 2001. "Nonlinear Dynamics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521558747, September.
    8. Drew Fudenberg & David K. Levine, 1998. "The Theory of Learning in Games," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262061945, April.
    9. Roger E. A. Farmer, 2002. "Why Does Data Reject the Lucas Critique," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 67-68, pages 111-129.
    10. Szidarovszky, F. & Krawczyk, J.B., 2004. "On stable learning in dynamic oligopolies," Pure Mathematics and Applications, Department of Mathematics, Corvinus University of Budapest, vol. 15(4), pages 453-468.
    11. N/A, 2002. "Subject Index," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(4), pages 342-418, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naimzada, Ahmad & Ricchiuti, Giorgio, 2011. "Monopoly with local knowledge of demand function," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 299-307.
    2. Troy Tassier, 2013. "Handbook of Research on Complexity, by J. Barkley Rosser, Jr. and Edward Elgar," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 39(1), pages 132-133.
    3. Antoci, Angelo & Gay, Antonio & Landi, Massimiliano & Sacco, Pier Luigi, 2008. "Global analysis of an expectations augmented evolutionary dynamics," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 32(12), pages 3877-3894, December.
    4. Ruben Geer & Arnoud V. Boer & Christopher Bayliss & Christine S. M. Currie & Andria Ellina & Malte Esders & Alwin Haensel & Xiao Lei & Kyle D. S. Maclean & Antonio Martinez-Sykora & Asbjørn Nilsen Ris, 2019. "Dynamic pricing and learning with competition: insights from the dynamic pricing challenge at the 2017 INFORMS RM & pricing conference," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(3), pages 185-203, June.
    5. Anufriev, Mikhail & Kopányi, Dávid, 2018. "Oligopoly game: Price makers meet price takers," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 84-103.
    6. Ruben van de Geer & Arnoud V. den Boer & Christopher Bayliss & Christine Currie & Andria Ellina & Malte Esders & Alwin Haensel & Xiao Lei & Kyle D. S. Maclean & Antonio Martinez-Sykora & Asbj{o}rn Nil, 2018. "Dynamic Pricing and Learning with Competition: Insights from the Dynamic Pricing Challenge at the 2017 INFORMS RM & Pricing Conference," Papers 1804.03219, arXiv.org.
    7. Junhai Ma & Lijian Sun & Xueli Zhan, 2017. "Study on Triopoly Dynamic Game Model Based on Different Demand Forecast Methods in the Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, July.
    8. Lamantia, Fabio & Pezzino, Mario & Tramontana, Fabio, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of discontinuous best response with innovation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 120-133.
    9. Bischi, Gian Italo & Naimzada, Ahmad K. & Sbragia, Lucia, 2007. "Oligopoly games with Local Monopolistic Approximation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 371-388, March.
    10. Torsten J. Gerpott & Jan Berends, 2022. "Competitive pricing on online markets: a literature review," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 596-622, December.
    11. Antonio Doria, Francisco, 2011. "J.B. Rosser Jr. , Handbook of Research on Complexity, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK--Northampton, MA, USA (2009) 436 + viii pp., index, ISBN 978 1 84542 089 5 (cased)," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 196-204, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laurence Kranich & Andrés Perea & Hans Peters, 2005. "Core Concepts For Dynamic Tu Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(01), pages 43-61.
    2. David Y. Choi & Dong Chen & Woo Jin Lee, 2010. "Asian American-Founded Ventures In Silicon Valley: Challenges, Strategic Partnership, And Performance," Journal of Enterprising Culture (JEC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 355-375.
    3. Kristina Risom Jespersen, 2011. "Online Channels And Innovation: Are Users Being Empowered And Involved?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1141-1159.
    4. Sohrab Effati & Abbas Ghomashi & Masumeh Abbasi, 2011. "A NOVEL RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORK FOR SOLVING MLCPsAND ITS APPLICATION TO LINEAR AND QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 28(04), pages 523-541.
    5. Antoine Bureth & Julien Pénin & Sandrine Wolff, 2010. "Start-Up Creation In Biotechnology: Lessons From The Case Of Four New Ventures In The Upper Rhine Biovalley," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 253-283.
    6. Sukanlaya Sawang & Kerrie L. Unsworth, 2011. "A Model Of Organizational Innovation Implementation Effectiveness In Small To Medium Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 989-1011.
    7. Gian Marco Palamara & Vinko Zlatić & Antonio Scala & Guido Caldarelli, 2011. "Population Dynamics On Complex Food Webs," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 635-647.
    8. Norma Juma & G. Tyge Payne, 2004. "Intellectual Capital And Performance Of New Venture High-Tech Firms," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 8(03), pages 297-318.
    9. Qi Xuan & Chenbo Fu & Li Yu, 2014. "Ranking Developer Candidates By Social Links," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(07n08), pages 1-19.
    10. Hao Zhang & Zhi-Hong Jiang & Hui Wang & Fei Xie & Chao Chen, 2012. "Role Of Edges In Complex Network Epidemiology," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(09), pages 1-10.
    11. Raluca Bunduchi, 2009. "Implementing Best Practices To Support Creativity In Npd Cross-Functional Teams," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(04), pages 537-554.
    12. Jan Tuinstra, 2004. "A Price Adjustment Process In A Model Of Monopolistic Competition," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 417-442.
    13. Mark Freel, 2005. "The Characteristics Of Innovation-Intensive Small Firms: Evidence From "Northern Britain"," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(04), pages 401-429.
    14. Patrick J. Trotter, 2011. "A New Modified Total Front End Framework For Innovation: New Insights From Health Related Industries," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(05), pages 1013-1041.
    15. Pietro Gravino & Vito D. P. Servedio & Alain Barrat & Vittorio Loreto, 2012. "Complex Structures And Semantics In Free Word Association," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(03n04), pages 1-22.
    16. Laxmidhar Behera & Frank Schweitzer, 2003. "On Spatial Consensus Formation: Is The Sznajd Model Different From A Voter Model?," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(10), pages 1331-1354.
    17. Dieter Balkenborg & Rosemarie Nagel, 2016. "An Experiment on Forward vs. Backward Induction: How Fairness and Level k Reasoning Matter," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 17(3), pages 378-408, August.
    18. Kristina Risom Jespersen, 2010. "User-Involvement And Open Innovation: The Case Of Decision-Maker Openness," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 471-489.
    19. Mengel, Friederike, 2012. "Learning across games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 601-619.
    20. Jan Wenzelburger, 2004. "Learning To Play Best Response In Duopoly Games," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 443-459.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Oligopoly games; bounded rationality; bifurcations; misspecified demand (function); self-confirming steady states;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B4 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Economic Methodology
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General
    • C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling
    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • D5 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium
    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • M2 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:06:y:2004:i:03:n:s0219198904000253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/igtr/igtr.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.