IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/5434680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Triopoly Dynamic Game Model Based on Different Demand Forecast Methods in the Market

Author

Listed:
  • Junhai Ma
  • Lijian Sun
  • Xueli Zhan

Abstract

The impact of inaccurate demand beliefs on dynamics of a Triopoly game is studied. We suppose that all the players make their own estimations on possible demand with errors. A dynamic Triopoly game with such demand belief is set up. Based on this model, existence and local stable region of the equilibriums are investigated by 3D stable regions of Nash equilibrium point. The complex dynamics, such as bifurcation scenarios and route to chaos, are displayed in 2D bifurcation diagrams, in which and are negatively related to each other. Basins of attraction are investigated and we found that the attraction domain becomes smaller with the increase in price modification speed, which indicates that all the players’ output must be kept within a certain range so as to keep the system stable. Feedback control method is used to keep the system at an equilibrium state.

Suggested Citation

  • Junhai Ma & Lijian Sun & Xueli Zhan, 2017. "Study on Triopoly Dynamic Game Model Based on Different Demand Forecast Methods in the Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5434680
    DOI: 10.1155/2017/5434680
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2017/5434680.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2017/5434680.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2017/5434680?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manimehan, I. & Philominathan, P., 2012. "Composite dynamical behaviors in a simple series–parallel LC circuit," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(12), pages 1501-1509.
    2. Gian-Italo Bischi & Carl Chiarella & Michael Kopel, 2004. "The Long Run Outcomes And Global Dynamics Of A Duopoly Game With Misspecified Demand Functions," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 6(03), pages 343-379.
    3. Zhang, Jixiang & Da, Qingli & Wang, Yanhua, 2007. "Analysis of nonlinear duopoly game with heterogeneous players," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 138-148, January.
    4. Hołyst, Janusz A & Urbanowicz, Krzysztof, 2000. "Chaos control in economical model by time-delayed feedback method," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 587-598.
    5. A. Matsumoto, 2006. "Controlling the Cournot-Nash Chaos," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 128(2), pages 379-392, February.
    6. Ma, Jun-Hai & Ji, Wei-Zhuo, 2009. "Complexity of repeated game model in electric power triopoly," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 1735-1740.
    7. Zhang, Zhonghua & Wu, Jianhua & Suo, Yaohong & Song, Xinyu, 2011. "The domain of attraction for the endemic equilibrium of an SIRS epidemic model," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 81(9), pages 1697-1706.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuxuan Gao & Yueping Du & Haiming Liang & Bingzhen Sun, 2018. "Large Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Stochastic MULTIMOORA: An Application of Doctor Evaluation in Healthcare Service," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xin, Baogui & Chen, Tong, 2011. "On a master-slave Bertrand game model," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 1864-1870, July.
    2. Askar, S.S., 2018. "Tripoly Stackelberg game model: One leader versus two followers," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 328(C), pages 301-311.
    3. S. S. Askar & Mona F. EL-Wakeel & M. A. Alrodaini, 2018. "Exploration of Complex Dynamics for Cournot Oligopoly Game with Differentiated Products," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, February.
    4. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian, 2015. "Complex dynamics analysis for a duopoly Stackelberg game model with bounded rationality," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 259-268.
    5. Ding, Zhanwen & Wang, Qiao & Jiang, Shumin, 2014. "Analysis on the dynamics of a Cournot investment game with bounded rationality," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 204-212.
    6. Ding, Zhanwen & Li, Qiang & Jiang, Shumin & Wang, Xuedi, 2015. "Dynamics in a Cournot investment game with heterogeneous players," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 939-950.
    7. Qiuxiang Li & Mengnan Shi & Yimin Huang, 2019. "A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Nicoleta SÎRGHI & Mihaela NEAMŢU & Petru Claudiu STRĂIN, 2015. "Analysis of a Dynamical Cournot Duopoly Game with Distributed Time Delay," Timisoara Journal of Economics and Business, West University of Timisoara, Romania, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 8(1s), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Peng, Yu & Lu, Qian & Xiao, Yue, 2016. "A dynamic Stackelberg duopoly model with different strategies," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 128-134.
    10. S. S. Askar, 2020. "Duopolistic Stackelberg game: investigation of complex dynamics and chaos control," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1685-1699, September.
    11. Ding, Zhanwen & Shi, Guiping, 2009. "Cooperation in a dynamical adjustment of duopoly game with incomplete information," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 989-993.
    12. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2013. "Efficient bargaining versus right to manage: A stability analysis in a Cournot duopoly with trade unions," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 205-211.
    13. Villena, Marcelo J. & Araneda, Axel A., 2017. "Dynamics and stability in retail competition," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 37-53.
    14. Hajipour, Ahamad & Hajipour, Mojtaba & Baleanu, Dumitru, 2018. "On the adaptive sliding mode controller for a hyperchaotic fractional-order financial system," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 139-153.
    15. Lin, Jinchai & Fan, Ruguo & Tan, Xianchun & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Dynamic decision and coordination in a low-carbon supply chain considering the retailer's social preference," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Veronika Novotná & Vladěna Štěpánková, 2015. "Parameter Estimation for Dynamic Model of the Financial System," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 63(6), pages 2051-2055.
    17. Akhmet, Marat & Akhmetova, Zhanar & Fen, Mehmet Onur, 2014. "Chaos in economic models with exogenous shocks," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 95-108.
    18. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2012. "The dynamics of a differentiated duopoly with quantity competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 421-427.
    19. Lamantia, Fabio & Pezzino, Mario & Tramontana, Fabio, 2018. "Dynamic analysis of discontinuous best response with innovation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 120-133.
    20. Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2013. "Stability Analysis in a Bertrand Duopoly with Different Product Quality and Heterogeneous Expectations," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 481-501, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5434680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.