IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/apjorx/v34y2017i06ns021759591750035x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Models for Computing the Distance of DMUs to the Weak Efficient Boundary of Convex and Nonconvex PPSs in DEA

Author

Listed:
  • J. Vakili

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematics Science, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran)

Abstract

In data envelopment analysis (DEA), calculating the distances of decision making units (DMUs) from the weak efficient boundary of a production possibility set (PPS) is a very important subject which has attracted increasing interest of researchers in recent years. The distances of DMUs to the weak efficient boundary of the PPS can be used to evaluate the performance of DMUs, obtain the closest efficient patterns and also assess the sensitivity and stability of efficiency classifications in DEA. The present study proposes some new models which compute the distances of DMUs from the weak efficient boundary of a PPS for both convex and nonconvex PPSs using Hölder norms. In fact, the presented models assist a DMU to improve its performance by an appropriate movement towards the weak efficient boundary.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Vakili, 2017. "New Models for Computing the Distance of DMUs to the Weak Efficient Boundary of Convex and Nonconvex PPSs in DEA," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 34(06), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:34:y:2017:i:06:n:s021759591750035x
    DOI: 10.1142/S021759591750035X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S021759591750035X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S021759591750035X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. R. Jahanshahloo & J. Vakili & S. M. Mirdehghan, 2012. "USING THE MINIMUM DISTANCE OF DMUs FROM THE FRONTIER OF THE PPS FOR EVALUATING GROUP PERFORMANCE OF DMUs IN DEA," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 29(02), pages 1-25.
    2. Tarja Joro & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 1998. "Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(7), pages 962-970, July.
    3. Calvete, Herminia I. & Gale, Carmen & Mateo, Pedro M., 2008. "A new approach for solving linear bilevel problems using genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 14-28, July.
    4. Joro, Tarja & Korhonen, Pekka & Zionts, Stanley, 2003. "An interactive approach to improve estimates of value efficiency in data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 688-699, September.
    5. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    6. W. Briec & J. B. Lesourd, 1999. "Metric Distance Function and Profit: Some Duality Results," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 15-33, April.
    7. Juan Aparicio & José Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2007. "Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 209-218, December.
    8. M P Estellita Lins & L Angulo-Meza & A C Moreira Da Silva, 2004. "A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(10), pages 1090-1101, October.
    9. Maria Silva Portela & Pedro Borges & Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 2003. "Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 251-269, April.
    10. Walter Briec & Hervé Leleu, 2003. "Dual Representations of Non-Parametric Technologies and Measurement of Technical Efficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 71-96, July.
    11. Aparicio, Juan & Pastor, Jesus T., 2014. "Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 51-57.
    12. Frances Frei & Patrick Harker, 1999. "Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 275-300, June.
    13. Gonzalez, Eduardo & Alvarez, Antonio, 2001. "From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(3), pages 512-520, September.
    14. W. Briec, 1999. "Hölder Distance Function and Measurement of Technical Efficiency," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 111-131, April.
    15. Briec, W. & Lemaire, B., 1999. "Technical efficiency and distance to a reverse convex set," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 178-187, April.
    16. William W. Cooper & Lawrence M. Seiford & Kaoru Tone, 2006. "Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-0-387-29122-2, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. Vakili & R. Sadighi Dizaji, 2021. "The closest strong efficient targets in the FDH technology: an enumeration method," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 91-105, April.
    2. Chang Cong & Peibiao Zhao, 2018. "Non-Cash Risk Measure on Nonconvex Sets," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-9, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangqing Wei & Yanan Fu & Feng Yang & Chun Sun & Sheng Ang, 2023. "Closest target setting with minimum improvement costs considering demand and resource mismatches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-29, September.
    2. Aparicio, Juan & Pastor, Jesus T., 2014. "Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 51-57.
    3. Aparicio, Juan & Garcia-Nove, Eva M. & Kapelko, Magdalena & Pastor, Jesus T., 2017. "Graph productivity change measure using the least distance to the pareto-efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1-14.
    4. J. Vakili & R. Sadighi Dizaji, 2021. "The closest strong efficient targets in the FDH technology: an enumeration method," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 91-105, April.
    5. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "Closest targets in the slacks-based measure of efficiency for production units with multi-period data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1042-1054.
    6. Aparicio, Juan & Cordero, Jose M. & Pastor, Jesus T., 2017. "The determination of the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis oriented models: Modelling and computational aspects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-10.
    7. Kao, Chiang, 2024. "Maximum slacks-based measure of efficiency in network data envelopment analysis: A case of garment manufacturing," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    8. Zhu, Qingyuan & Aparicio, Juan & Li, Feng & Wu, Jie & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Determining closest targets on the extended facet production possibility set in data envelopment analysis: Modeling and computational aspects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 927-939.
    9. Fangqing Wei & Junfei Chu & Jiayun Song & Feng Yang, 2019. "A cross-bargaining game approach for direction selection in the directional distance function," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 41(3), pages 787-807, September.
    10. Juan Aparicio & Jesus T. Pastor & Jose L. Sainz-Pardo & Fernando Vidal, 2020. "Estimating and decomposing overall inefficiency by determining the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 747-770, June.
    11. Somayeh Razipour-GhalehJough & Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi & Gholamreza Jahanshahloo & Mohsen Rostamy-malkhalifeh & Hamid Sharafi, 2020. "Finding closest target for bank branches in the presence of weight restrictions using data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 755-787, May.
    12. Cook, Wade D. & Seiford, Larry M., 2009. "Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Suzuki, Soushi & Nijkamp, Peter, 2016. "An evaluation of energy-environment-economic efficiency for EU, APEC and ASEAN countries: Design of a Target-Oriented DFM model with fixed factors in Data Envelopment Analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 100-112.
    14. Juan Aparicio & Magdalena Kapelko & Bernhard Mahlberg & Jose L. Sainz-Pardo, 2017. "Measuring input-specific productivity change based on the principle of least action," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 17-31, February.
    15. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp & Soushi Suzuki, 2023. "Quantitative performance assessment of Asian stellar cities by a DEA cascade system: a capability interpretation," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 70(1), pages 259-286, February.
    16. Sekitani, Kazuyuki & Zhao, Yu, 2023. "Least-distance approach for efficiency analysis: A framework for nonlinear DEA models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1296-1310.
    17. Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2019. "Performance evaluation through DEA benchmarking adjusted to goals," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 150-157.
    18. Javad Vakili & Hanieh Amirmoshiri & Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2020. "A modified distance friction minimization approach in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 288(2), pages 789-804, May.
    19. Ando, Kazutoshi & Minamide, Masato & Sekitani, Kazuyuki & Shi, Jianming, 2017. "Monotonicity of minimum distance inefficiency measures for Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(1), pages 232-243.
    20. Soushi Suzuki & Peter Nijkamp, 2021. "High urban population density as a facilitator of energy–environment–economy performance–development of an autoconfiguration target model in data envelopment analysis," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 261-287, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:34:y:2017:i:06:n:s021759591750035x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/apjor/apjor.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.