IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v12y2009i3p201-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design of experiments as a means of lean value delivery to the flight test enterprise

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron A Tucker
  • Cihan H Dagli

Abstract

Modern flight test tends to be a complex, expensive undertaking, so any increases in efficiency would result in considerable savings. Lean thinking is an effective method to identify value and eliminate waste and is particularly effective when applied to the entire flight test enterprise. Design of experiments is a statistical methodology that results in highly efficient flight test where only the samples needed are collected and analyzed. The application of design of experiments to flight test's value stream can result in a significant increase in lean value to the stakeholders and a reduction of waste. Design of experiments uses objective, verifiable statistical analysis to plan, execute, and analyze test. With lean stakeholder input, design of experiment's planning process ensures that the variables of interest are measured to provide a specified confidence in the analysis. Statistical confidence provides critical information on both the magnitude and significance of system performance. Further, design of experiments provides a statistical power that tells the stakeholders what magnitude of the effect could have been detected. Another benefit is that system response models are continually generated as test matrices are executed. These models enable the stakeholders to understand and evaluate system performance. This increases test safety and flexibility, which also creates value and eliminates waste in a resource‐limited experiment. A conceptual model is developed which shows how the design of experiments aligns the flight test process along the lean value delivery stream and identifies the stakeholders at each step. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals Inc. Syst Eng

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron A Tucker & Cihan H Dagli, 2009. "Design of experiments as a means of lean value delivery to the flight test enterprise," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 201-217, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:201-217
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.20119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.20119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Earll Murman & Thomas Allen & Kirkor Bozdogan & Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld & Hugh McManus & Deborah Nightingale & Eric Rebentisch & Tom Shields & Fred Stahl & Myles Walton & Joyce Warmkessel & Stanley W, 2002. "Lean Enterprise Value," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-4039-0750-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian M. Kennedy & Durward K. Sobek & Michael N. Kennedy, 2014. "Reducing Rework by Applying Set‐Based Practices Early in the Systems Engineering Process," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), pages 278-296, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bohdan W. Oppenheim & Earll M. Murman & Deborah A. Secor, 2011. "Lean Enablers for Systems Engineering," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(1), pages 29-55, March.
    2. Tyson R. Browning & Eric C. Honour, 2008. "Measuring the life‐cycle value of enduring systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 187-202, September.
    3. Tan Ching Ng & Morteza Ghobakhloo, 2018. "What Determines Lean Manufacturing Implementation? A CB-SEM Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Carol Ann McDevitt & Eric C Cahill & Craig Stambaugh, 2004. "System‐level application of the evolutionary product development process to manufactured goods," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 144-152.
    5. Samantha M. Brainard & Zoe Szajnfarber, 2019. "How government oversight adds time to contractor engineering work," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 54-65, January.
    6. Avner Engel & Tyson R. Browning, 2008. "Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(2), pages 125-146, June.
    7. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Joel, 2003. "Lean Transformation in the U.S. Aerospace Industry: Appreciating Interdependent Social and Technical Systems," Working papers 4299-03, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    8. Tyson R. Browning, 2003. "On customer value and improvement in product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(1), pages 49-61.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:12:y:2009:i:3:p:201-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.