IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v38y2018i1p177-193.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bias‐Corrected Estimation in Continuous Sampling Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Decrouez
  • Andrew Robinson

Abstract

Continuous sampling plans (CSPs) are algorithms used for monitoring and maintaining the quality of a production line. Although considerable work has been done on the development of CSPs, to our knowledge, there has been no corresponding effort in developing estimators with good statistical properties for data arising from a CSP inspection process. For example, information about the failure rate of the process will affect the management of the process, both in terms of selecting appropriate CSP parameters to keep the failure rate after inspection at a suitable level, and in terms of policy, for example, whether the process should be completely inspected, or shut down. The motivation for this exercise was developing sampling protocols for Australia's Department of Agriculture and Water Resources for monitoring the biosecurity compliance of incoming goods at international borders. In this study, we show that maximum likelihood estimation of the failure rate under a sampling scheme can be biased depending on when estimation is performed, and we provide explicit expressions for the main contribution of the bias under various CSPs. We then construct bias‐corrected estimators and confidence intervals, and evaluate their performance in a numerical study.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Decrouez & Andrew Robinson, 2018. "Bias‐Corrected Estimation in Continuous Sampling Plans," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(1), pages 177-193, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:177-193
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.12811
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12811
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.12811?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Klein, Ruben, 1994. "Bias correction in ARMA models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 169-176, February.
    2. V. S. Sampath Kumar & M. B. Rajarshi, 1987. "Continuous sampling plans for markov‐dependent production processes," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(5), pages 629-644, October.
    3. Yongxin Cao & Velusamy Subramaniam, 2013. "Improving the performance of manufacturing systems with continuous sampling plans," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(6), pages 575-590.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sueli Mingoti & Julia De Carvalho & Joab De Oliveira Lima, 2008. "On the estimation of serial correlation in Markov-dependent production processes," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(7), pages 763-771.
    2. Joseph Reath & Jianping Dong & Min Wang, 2018. "Improved parameter estimation of the log-logistic distribution with applications," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 339-356, March.
    3. Ferrari, Silvia L. P. & Cribari-Neto, Francisco, 1998. "On bootstrap and analytical bias corrections," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 7-15, January.
    4. Reinsel, Gregory C. & Cheang, Wai-Kwong, 2003. "Approximate ML and REML estimation for regression models with spatial or time series AR(1) noise," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 123-135, April.
    5. Demos Antonis & Kyriakopoulou Dimitra, 2019. "Finite-Sample Theory and Bias Correction of Maximum Likelihood Estimators in the EGARCH Model," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Mahdi Teimouri, 2022. "bccp: an R package for life-testing and survival analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 469-489, March.
    7. Yong Bao, 2015. "Should We Demean the Data?," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 16(1), pages 163-171, May.
    8. Ghitany, M.E. & Al-Mutairi, D.K. & Balakrishnan, N. & Al-Enezi, L.J., 2013. "Power Lindley distribution and associated inference," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 20-33.
    9. Stelios Arvanitis & Antonis Demos, 2015. "A class of indirect inference estimators: higher‐order asymptotics and approximate bias correction," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 18(2), pages 200-241, June.
    10. Cordeiro, Gauss M. & Vasconcellos, Klaus L. P., 1997. "Bias correction for a class of multivariate nonlinear regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 155-164, September.
    11. Hua Xin & Yuhlong Lio & Ya-Yen Fan & Tzong-Ru Tsai, 2024. "Bias-Correction Methods for the Unit Exponential Distribution and Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Mentz, R. P. & Morettin, P. A. & Toloi, C. M. C., 1999. "On least-squares estimation of the residual variance in the first-order moving average model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 485-499, February.
    13. Wei, Shuaichong & Nourelfath, Mustapha & Nahas, Nabil, 2023. "Analysis of a production line subject to degradation and preventive maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. David E. Giles, 2012. "A Note on Improved Estimation for the Topp-Leone Distribution," Econometrics Working Papers 1203, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
    15. David E. Giles, 2021. "Improved Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Weibull Distribution Under Length-Biased Sampling," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 19(1), pages 59-77, December.
    16. F. Cribari-Neto & G.M. Cordeiro, 1995. "On Bartlett and Bartlett-Type Corrections," Econometrics 9507001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Cordeiro, Gauss M., 2008. "Corrected Maximum Likelihood Estimators in Linear Heteroskedastic Regression Models," Brazilian Review of Econometrics, Sociedade Brasileira de Econometria - SBE, vol. 28(1), May.
    18. Sigrunn H. Sørbye & Pedro G. Nicolau & Håvard Rue, 2022. "Finite-sample properties of estimators for first and second order autoregressive processes," Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 577-598, October.
    19. Tzong-Ru Tsai & Hua Xin & Ya-Yen Fan & Yuhlong Lio, 2022. "Bias-Corrected Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Bayesian Inference for the Process Performance Index Using Inverse Gaussian Distribution," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Joint economic design of production, continuous sampling inspection and preventive maintenance of a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 184-198.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:38:y:2018:i:1:p:177-193. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.