IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v26y2006i3p573-575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weight of Evidence: What Is the State of the Science?

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Linkov
  • F. Kyle Satterstrom

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Linkov & F. Kyle Satterstrom, 2006. "Weight of Evidence: What Is the State of the Science?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 573-575, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:573-575
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00756.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00756.x
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00756.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Douglas L. Weed, 2005. "Weight of Evidence: A Review of Concept and Methods," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1545-1557, December.
    2. Krimsky, S., 2005. "The weight of scientific evidence in policy and law," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(S1), pages 129-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard R. Lester & Laura C. Green & Igor Linkov, 2007. "Site‐Specific Applications of Probabilistic Health Risk Assessment: Review of the Literature Since 2000," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3), pages 635-658, June.
    2. Peter Wiedemann & Holger Schütz & Albena Spangenberg & Harald F. Krug, 2011. "Evidence Maps: Communicating Risk Assessments in Societal Controversies: The Case of Engineered Nanoparticles," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(11), pages 1770-1783, November.
    3. Douglas L. Weed, 2006. "Vision, Values, and Verisimilitude: The Author's Response," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 577-577, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Randall Lutter & Linda Abbott & Rick Becker & Chris Borgert & Ann Bradley & Gail Charnley & Susan Dudley & Alan Felsot & Nancy Golden & George Gray & Daland Juberg & Mary Mitchell & Nancy Rachman & Lo, 2015. "Improving Weight of Evidence Approaches to Chemical Evaluations," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(2), pages 186-192, February.
    2. Peter Wiedemann & Holger Schütz & Albena Spangenberg & Harald F. Krug, 2011. "Evidence Maps: Communicating Risk Assessments in Societal Controversies: The Case of Engineered Nanoparticles," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(11), pages 1770-1783, November.
    3. Douglas L. Weed, 2006. "Vision, Values, and Verisimilitude: The Author's Response," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 577-577, June.
    4. Oliver Todt & José Luis Luján, 2014. "Analyzing Precautionary Regulation: Do Precaution, Science, and Innovation Go Together?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(12), pages 2163-2173, December.
    5. Igor Linkov & Susan Cormier & Joshua Gold & F. Kyle Satterstrom & Todd Bridges, 2012. "Using Our Brains to Develop Better Policy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 374-380, March.
    6. Igor Linkov & Paul Welle & Drew Loney & Alex Tkachuk & Laure Canis & J. B. Kim & Todd Bridges, 2011. "Use of Multicriteria Decision Analysis to Support Weight of Evidence Evaluation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(8), pages 1211-1225, August.
    7. Kristin A. Duncan & Jonathan L. Wilson, 2008. "A Multinomial‐Dirichlet Model for Analysis of Competing Hypotheses," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1699-1709, December.
    8. René Ulloa-Espíndola & Susana Martín-Fernández, 2021. "Simulation and Analysis of Land Use Changes Applying Cellular Automata in the South of Quito and the Machachi Valley, Province of Pichincha, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Xinge Wang & Na Li & Mei Ma & Yingnan Han & Kaifeng Rao, 2022. "Immunotoxicity In Vitro Assays for Environmental Pollutants under Paradigm Shift in Toxicity Tests," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Lorenz Rhomberg, 2015. "Hypothesis‐Based Weight of Evidence: An Approach to Assessing Causation and its Application to Regulatory Toxicology," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(6), pages 1114-1124, June.
    11. Kai Guo & Yiyun Chen & Min Chen & Chaojun Wang & Zeyi Chen & Weinan Cai & Renjie Li & Weiming Feng & Ming Jiang, 2021. "Causal Analysis of Ecological Impairment in Land Ecosystem on a Regional Scale: Applied to a Mining City Daye, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    12. Maarten Pieter Schinkel, 2008. "Forensic Economics In Competition Law Enforcement," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 1-30.
    13. Long Trinh & Giang Vu & Peter Steen & Piet Lens, 2013. "Climate Change Adaptation Indicators to Assess Wastewater Management and Reuse Options in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(5), pages 1175-1191, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:26:y:2006:i:3:p:573-575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.