IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v59y2012i1p26-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimization of schedule stability and efficiency under processing time variability and random machine breakdowns in a job shop environment

Author

Listed:
  • Selcuk Goren
  • Ihsan Sabuncuoglu
  • Utku Koc

Abstract

The ability to cope with uncertainty in dynamic scheduling environments is becoming an increasingly important issue. In such environments, any disruption in the production schedule will translate into a disturbance of the plans for several external activities as well. Hence, from a practical point of view, deviations between the planned and realized schedules are to be avoided as much as possible. The term stability refers to this concern. We propose a proactive approach to generate efficient and stable schedules for a job shop subject to processing time variability and random machine breakdowns. In our approach, efficiency is measured by the makespan, and the stability measure is the sum of the variances of the realized completion times. Because the calculation of the original measure is mathematically intractable, we develop a surrogate stability measure. The version of the problem with the surrogate stability measure is proven to be NP‐hard, even without machine breakdowns; a branch‐and‐bound algorithm is developed for this problem variant. A tabu search algorithm is proposed to handle larger instances of the problem with machine breakdowns. The results of extensive computational experiments indicate that the proposed algorithms are quite promising in performance. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Naval Research Logistics, 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Selcuk Goren & Ihsan Sabuncuoglu & Utku Koc, 2012. "Optimization of schedule stability and efficiency under processing time variability and random machine breakdowns in a job shop environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(1), pages 26-38, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:1:p:26-38
    DOI: 10.1002/nav.20488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20488
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/nav.20488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James C. Bean & John R. Birge & John Mittenthal & Charles E. Noon, 1991. "Matchup Scheduling with Multiple Resources, Release Dates and Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 470-483, June.
    2. Peter J. M. van Laarhoven & Emile H. L. Aarts & Jan Karel Lenstra, 1992. "Job Shop Scheduling by Simulated Annealing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 40(1), pages 113-125, February.
    3. Selcuk Goren & Ihsan Sabuncuoglu, 2010. "Optimization of schedule robustness and stability under random machine breakdowns and processing time variability," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 203-220.
    4. Arfst Ludwig & Rolf Möhring & Frederik Stork, 2001. "A Computational Study on Bounding the Makespan Distribution in Stochastic Project Networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 49-64, February.
    5. Robert H. Storer & S. David Wu & Renzo Vaccari, 1992. "New Search Spaces for Sequencing Problems with Application to Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(10), pages 1495-1509, October.
    6. Herroelen, Willy & Leus, Roel, 2005. "Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(2), pages 289-306, September.
    7. Aytug, Haldun & Lawley, Mark A. & McKay, Kenneth & Mohan, Shantha & Uzsoy, Reha, 2005. "Executing production schedules in the face of uncertainties: A review and some future directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(1), pages 86-110, February.
    8. Van de Vonder, Stijn & Demeulemeester, Erik & Herroelen, Willy, 2008. "Proactive heuristic procedures for robust project scheduling: An experimental analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(3), pages 723-733, September.
    9. M. R. Garey & D. S. Johnson & Ravi Sethi, 1976. "The Complexity of Flowshop and Jobshop Scheduling," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 117-129, May.
    10. Egon Balas, 1969. "Machine Sequencing Via Disjunctive Graphs: An Implicit Enumeration Algorithm," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 941-957, December.
    11. Joseph Adams & Egon Balas & Daniel Zawack, 1988. "The Shifting Bottleneck Procedure for Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 391-401, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. T. C. E. Cheng & Bo Peng & Zhipeng Lü, 2016. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm to solve the job shop scheduling problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 223-237, July.
    2. Blazewicz, Jacek & Domschke, Wolfgang & Pesch, Erwin, 1996. "The job shop scheduling problem: Conventional and new solution techniques," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 1-33, August.
    3. Xiong, Jian & Xing, Li-ning & Chen, Ying-wu, 2013. "Robust scheduling for multi-objective flexible job-shop problems with random machine breakdowns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 112-126.
    4. Da Col, Giacomo & Teppan, Erich C., 2022. "Industrial-size job shop scheduling with constraint programming," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    5. Ganesan, Viswanath Kumar & Sivakumar, Appa Iyer, 2006. "Scheduling in static jobshops for minimizing mean flowtime subject to minimum total deviation of job completion times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 633-647, October.
    6. Bürgy, Reinhard & Bülbül, Kerem, 2018. "The job shop scheduling problem with convex costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 82-100.
    7. Guinet, Alain & Legrand, Marie, 1998. "Reduction of job-shop problems to flow-shop problems with precedence constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 96-110, August.
    8. Trietsch, Dan & Mazmanyan, Lilit & Gevorgyan, Lilit & Baker, Kenneth R., 2012. "Modeling activity times by the Parkinson distribution with a lognormal core: Theory and validation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(2), pages 386-396.
    9. Shichang Xiao & Shudong Sun & Jionghua (Judy) Jin, 2017. "Surrogate Measures for the Robust Scheduling of Stochastic Job Shop Scheduling Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Demirkol, Ebru & Mehta, Sanjay & Uzsoy, Reha, 1998. "Benchmarks for shop scheduling problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 137-141, August.
    11. Öncü Hazir & Gündüz Ulusoy, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," Post-Print hal-02898162, HAL.
    12. Nicholas G. Hall & Chris N. Potts, 2010. "Rescheduling for Job Unavailability," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 746-755, June.
    13. Chong Peng & Guanglin Wu & T Warren Liao & Hedong Wang, 2019. "Research on multi-agent genetic algorithm based on tabu search for the job shop scheduling problem," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    14. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    15. Steinhofel, K. & Albrecht, A. & Wong, C. K., 1999. "Two simulated annealing-based heuristics for the job shop scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(3), pages 524-548, November.
    16. Edzard Weber & Anselm Tiefenbacher & Norbert Gronau, 2019. "Need for Standardization and Systematization of Test Data for Job-Shop Scheduling," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Valls, Vicente & Angeles Perez, M. & Sacramento Quintanilla, M., 1998. "A tabu search approach to machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(2-3), pages 277-300, April.
    18. Hazır, Öncü & Ulusoy, Gündüz, 2020. "A classification and review of approaches and methods for modeling uncertainty in projects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    19. G I Zobolas & C D Tarantilis & G Ioannou, 2009. "A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for the job shop scheduling problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(2), pages 221-235, February.
    20. Egon Balas & Alkis Vazacopoulos, 1998. "Guided Local Search with Shifting Bottleneck for Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 262-275, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:59:y:2012:i:1:p:26-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.