IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/navres/v36y1989i1p69-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of project scheduling strategies in a client‐contractor environment

Author

Listed:
  • Joshua B. Levy
  • Giri Kumar Tayi

Abstract

In this article we consider a cost‐minimization model to investigate scheduling strategies for multistaged projects in a client‐contractor environment. This type of environment is symptomatic of temporal changes in project definition and scope. At prespecified epochs the client conducts an external evaluation of the project and either accepts or rejects the contractor's current work. The resulting uncertainty from the client's review is modeled via monotonically varying acceptance probabilities. The model is designed primarily to address the interaction between earliest‐, intermediate‐, and latest‐start options and project‐crashing stragies for a broad range of penalty costs. Theoretical results are introduced, while numerical examples for both exponentially and polynomially based acceptance probabilities are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Joshua B. Levy & Giri Kumar Tayi, 1989. "Analysis of project scheduling strategies in a client‐contractor environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 69-87, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:36:y:1989:i:1:p:69-87
    DOI: 10.1002/1520-6750(198902)36:13.0.CO;2-E
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6750(198902)36:13.0.CO;2-E
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1520-6750(198902)36:13.0.CO;2-E?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernard W. Taylor, III & Laurence J. Moore, 1980. "R&D Project Planning with Q-GERT Network Modeling and Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 44-59, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Jingru & Fang, Zhigeng & Dong, Wenjie & Liu, Sifeng & Chen, Ding, 2024. "A mission success probability assessment framework for phased-mission-systems using extended graphical evaluation and review technique," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Tyson R. Browning, 2002. "Process integration using the design structure matrix," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3), pages 180-193.
    3. Tyson R. Browning & Ernst Fricke & Herbert Negele, 2006. "Key concepts in modeling product development processes," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 104-128, June.
    4. Michael T. Pich & Christoph H. Loch & Arnoud De Meyer, 2002. "On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(8), pages 1008-1023, August.
    5. Mobin, Mohammadsadegh & Li, Zhaojun & Cheraghi, S. Hossein & Wu, Gongyu, 2019. "An approach for design Verification and Validation planning and optimization for new product reliability improvement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Nelson, Richard Graham & Azaron, Amir & Aref, Samin, 2016. "The use of a GERT based method to model concurrent product development processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 566-578.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:navres:v:36:y:1989:i:1:p:69-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6750 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.