IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v18y1999i3p411-425.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A place at the table: Policy analysis, its postpositive critics, and future of practice

Author

Listed:
  • Laurence E. Lynn

    (Harris Graduate School of Public Policy Studies, University of Chicago)

Abstract

Postpositivist critics have brought a new stridency to the ongoing discourse about the nature, applications, and usefulness of policy analysis. Regrettably, their critique is based on a decontextualized caricature, virtually a parody, of policy analysis training and practice. Their assertions are chilling but false, ideological rather than analytical, and detached from the inconvenient realities of policy making and management. Far from being narrowly technocratic and scientistic, policy analysis is dedicated to improving the craft of governance. It is fueled by intuition, argument, and ethical promptings; clearly engaged with the world of political action; and often identified with interests and values otherwise unrepresented at the table. Q-methodology and other approaches to values identification and analysis can be important contributors to policy analysis practice, but postpositivists have a very long way to go if they are to be relevant to the practical challenges of democratic governance that arise in the many roles that working policy analysts perform. © 1999 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurence E. Lynn, 1999. "A place at the table: Policy analysis, its postpositive critics, and future of practice," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(3), pages 411-425.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:411-425
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199922)18:3<411::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-G
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dryzek, John S. & Leonard, Stephen T., 1988. "History and Discipline in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 82(4), pages 1245-1260, December.
    2. William Ascher, 1987. "Editorial: Policy sciences and the economic approach in a ‘post-positivist’ era," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 20(1), pages 3-9, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ching Leong & Raul Lejano, 2016. "Thick narratives and the persistence of institutions: using the Q methodology to analyse IWRM reforms around the Yellow River," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(4), pages 445-465, December.
    2. Francine Sanders Romero, 2001. "The Policy Analysis Course: Toward a Discipline Consensus," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 771-779.
    3. Garoon, Joshua P. & Duggan, Patrick S., 2008. "Discourses of disease, discourses of disadvantage: A critical analysis of National Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Plans," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1133-1142, October.
    4. N C B Nath, 2008. "Suggesting Effective Policy Frames for Chronic Poverty Alleviation in India," Working Papers id:1804, eSocialSciences.
    5. Kolkman, Daan, 2020. "The usefulness of algorithmic models in policy making," SocArXiv hpma8, Center for Open Science.
    6. François Dedieu, 2022. "Organized denial at work: The difficult search for consistencies in French pesticide regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(3), pages 951-973, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mayntz, Renate, 2005. "Forschungsmethoden und Erkenntnispotential Natur- und Sozialwissenschaften im Vergleich," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Choi Eun-Mi, 2010. "Memory Politics and International Relations in East Asia," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 13(2), pages 63-79, June.
    3. Dennis A. Rondinelli & James S. McCullough & Ronald W. Johnson, 1989. "Analysing Decentralization Policies in Developing Countries: a Political‐Economy Framework," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 57-87, January.
    4. Mayntz, Renate, 2009. "Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären: Probleme der Theoriebildung und Methodologie," Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Köln, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, volume 63, number 63.
    5. Mayntz, Renate, 2005. "Embedded Theorizing: Perspectives on Globalization and Global Governance," MPIfG Discussion Paper 05/14, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    6. William Ascher, 2017. "Keeping the faith: policy sciences as the gatekeeper," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(2), pages 157-162, June.
    7. Mayntz, Renate, 2000. "Politikwissenschaft in einer entgrenzten Welt," MPIfG Discussion Paper 00/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:18:y:1999:i:3:p:411-425. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.