IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i5-6p899-908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients

Author

Listed:
  • Nurfika Asmaningrum
  • Dini Kurniawati
  • Yun‐Fang Tsai

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and compare nurses’ and patients’ viewpoints of disrespectful behaviours that threaten patient dignity during hospitalised care. Background Patient's dignity is an important ethical consideration for nursing care practice. In clinical settings, nurse–patient interactions can generate behaviour considered disrespectful and undignified, often due to a disruptive hospital atmosphere and emotional frustrations of nurses and patients. How behaviours and attitudes threaten patient dignity in Indonesian clinical care settings has not been well studied. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Methods This multi‐site study purposively recruited nurses and inpatients from six public hospitals in four districts in Eastern Java, Indonesia. Individual, face‐to‐face semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 35 inpatients and 40 registered nurses from medical and surgical wards. Data from verbatim transcriptions of digital audio recordings were analysed with inductive content analysis. The COREQ checklist for qualitative research was used for reporting this study. Results Five categories emerged which described disrespectful behaviours that threaten patient dignity. Three categories were important for both nurses and patients: negligence, impoliteness and dismissal. Descriptions of the behaviours were comparable for both groups. The forth category, inattentiveness, was highlighted by nurses, while the fifth category, discrimination, was highlighted by patients. Conclusions Examining behaviours considered to be disrespectful in an Indonesian healthcare setting expand on perspectives towards dignity in care. The comparable viewpoints of nurses and patients provide knowledge of how undignified behaviours could be reduced in cross‐cultural healthcare settings. Behaviours perceived as undignified primarily by nurses or patients might result from differences in social roles and responsibilities. Relevance to clinical practice Understanding nurses’ and patients’ perspectives of undignified care is an important step in reducing behaviours that violate patient dignity in clinical practice. Nurses’ commitment to patient‐centred care should include being responsive, compassionate, communicative and attentive, which could ameliorate instances of undignified behaviours.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurfika Asmaningrum & Dini Kurniawati & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2020. "Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 899-908, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:899-908
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15144
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15144?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Odette Griscti & Megan Aston & Grace Warner & Ruth Martin‐Misener & Deborah McLeod, 2017. "Power and resistance within the hospital's hierarchical system: the experiences of chronically ill patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(1-2), pages 238-247, January.
    2. Yea‐Pyng Lin & Yun‐Fang Tsai & Hsiu‐Fang Chen, 2011. "Dignity in care in the hospital setting from patients’ perspectives in Taiwan: a descriptive qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(5‐6), pages 794-801, March.
    3. Jassim, Ghufran A. & Whitford, David L., 2014. "Understanding the experiences and quality of life issues of Bahraini women with breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 189-195.
    4. Tiffany Conroy, 2018. "Factors influencing the delivery of the fundamentals of care: Perceptions of nurses, nursing leaders and healthcare consumers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2373-2386, June.
    5. Synnøve Caspari & Trygve Aasgaard & Vibeke Lohne & Åshild Slettebø & Dagfinn Nåden, 2013. "Perspectives of health personnel on how to preserve and promote the patients’ dignity in a rehabilitation context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2318-2326, August.
    6. Marcelle Tauber‐Gilmore & Christine Norton & Sue Procter & Trevor Murrells & Gulen Addis & Lesley Baillie & Pauline Velasco & Preet Athwal & Saeema Kayani & Zainab Zahran, 2018. "Development of tools to measure dignity for older people in acute hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3706-3718, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jesús Molina-Mula & Julia Gallo-Estrada, 2020. "Impact of Nurse-Patient Relationship on Quality of Care and Patient Autonomy in Decision-Making," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Haya Salem & Suhad Daher-Nashif, 2020. "Psychosocial Aspects of Female Breast Cancer in the Middle East and North Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Bjørg Christiansen & Marte Feiring, 2017. "Challenges in the nurse's role in rehabilitation contexts," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3239-3247, October.
    4. Lone Jørgensen & Susanne Kastrup Jensen & Bettina Brogaard, 2020. "Situational awareness in the outpatient encounter between patients with breast cancer or malignant melanoma and healthcare professionals: Patients’ perceptions," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1981-1990, June.
    5. Elise van Belle & Jeltje Giesen & Tiffany Conroy & Marloes van Mierlo & Hester Vermeulen & Getty Huisman‐de Waal & Maud Heinen, 2020. "Exploring person‐centred fundamental nursing care in hospital wards: A multi‐site ethnography," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1933-1944, June.
    6. Alison Kitson, 2018. "Moving on…," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2175-2176, June.
    7. Gunjan Sharma & Kushagra Kulshreshtha & Naval Bajpai, 2022. "Getting over the issue of theoretical stagnation: an exploration and metamorphosis of grounded theory approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 857-884, April.
    8. Annamaria Bagnasco & Milko Zanini & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Fiona Timmins & Miss Carolina Galanti & Giuseppe Aleo & Gianluca Catania & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1832-1857, June.
    9. Eva Jangland & Noeman Mirza & Tiffany Conroy & Clair Merriman & Emiko Suzui & Akiko Nishimura & Ann Ewens, 2018. "Nursing students' understanding of the Fundamentals of Care: A cross‐sectional study in five countries," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2460-2472, June.
    10. Flore, Jacinthe & Kokanović, Renata & Broom, Alex & Heynemann, Sarah & Lai-Kwon, Julia & Jefford, Michael, 2023. "Entanglements and imagined futures: The subject(s) of precision in oncology," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    11. Marcelle Tauber‐Gilmore & Gulen Addis & Zainab Zahran & Sally Black & Lesley Baillie & Sue Procter & Christine Norton, 2018. "The views of older people and health professionals about dignity in acute hospital care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 223-234, January.
    12. Abigail Affiong Mkperedem & Peter Ogunlade & Chisaa Igbolekwu & Ogadimma Arisukwu & Abiodun Olawale Afolabi & Ruth Adefunke Adedayo, 2023. "Healthcare service delivery perception among NHIS-HMO enrollees in Lagos hospitals," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Annamaria Bagnasco & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Carolina Galanti & Gloria Varone & Gianluca Catania & Milko Zanini & Giuseppe Aleo & Roger Watson & Mark Hayter & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Unmet nursing care needs on medical and surgical wards: A scoping review of patients’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 347-369, February.
    14. Sylvie Rey & Philippe Voyer & Suzanne Bouchard & Camille Savoie, 2020. "Finding the fundamental needs behind resistance to care: Using the Fundamentals of Care Practice Process," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1774-1787, June.
    15. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    16. Cathleen Aspinall & Jenny M. Parr & Julia Slark & Denise Wilson, 2020. "The culture conversation: Report from the 2nd Australasian ILC meeting—Auckland 2019," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1768-1773, June.
    17. Mien Li Goh & Emily N. K. Ang & Yiong-Huak Chan & Hong-Gu He & Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, 2018. "Patient Satisfaction Is Linked to Nursing Workload in a Singapore Hospital," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 27(6), pages 692-713, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:5-6:p:899-908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.