IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p3239-3247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges in the nurse's role in rehabilitation contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Bjørg Christiansen
  • Marte Feiring

Abstract

Aim and objective To shed light on how nurses perceive particular challenges that they experience in encounters with patients in rehabilitation wards. Background Rehabilitation is a tailor‐made process that allows someone with impairment to live well. Many rehabilitation institutions embrace strong beliefs in patient participation as well as awareness of and listening to the needs and wishes of patients. To our knowledge, few studies have investigated the challenges encountered by nurses from patients in rehabilitation contexts and how these challenges might influence their roles as nurses. Design and methods This study has a qualitative design that is based on three focus group interviews with nurses working in three rehabilitation wards. A convenience sample of 15 nurses, five from each ward, was recruited to participate in focus group interviews. The participants worked in wards for patients suffering mainly from stroke and head injuries. The analysis is inspired by hermeneutic principles to explore the participants’ challenges in their role in rehabilitation contexts. Results Data analyses identified three main themes surrounding the challenges experienced by nurses: (1) Adjusting patients’ and next of kin's expectations, (2) Tailoring support and information, (3) Recognising patients’ knowledge. Conclusion Our results from the three rehabilitation wards indicate that nurses display various educative strategies. There is, however, a need for further empirical work into how knowledgeable patients and next of kin create new challenges with implications for the nurse's role within rehabilitation contexts. Relevance to clinical practice The study highlights the educative aspects of the nurse's role in relation to patients and next of kin on rehabilitation wards as significant contributors to recovery processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørg Christiansen & Marte Feiring, 2017. "Challenges in the nurse's role in rehabilitation contexts," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3239-3247, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3239-3247
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13674
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13674?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mari Carmen Portillo & Sarah Cowley, 2011. "Working the way up in neurological rehabilitation: the holistic approach of nursing care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(11‐12), pages 1731-1743, June.
    2. Synnøve Caspari & Trygve Aasgaard & Vibeke Lohne & Åshild Slettebø & Dagfinn Nåden, 2013. "Perspectives of health personnel on how to preserve and promote the patients’ dignity in a rehabilitation context," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(15-16), pages 2318-2326, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nurfika Asmaningrum & Dini Kurniawati & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2020. "Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 899-908, March.
    2. Annamaria Bagnasco & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Carolina Galanti & Gloria Varone & Gianluca Catania & Milko Zanini & Giuseppe Aleo & Roger Watson & Mark Hayter & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Unmet nursing care needs on medical and surgical wards: A scoping review of patients’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(3-4), pages 347-369, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3239-3247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.