IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i19-20p3706-3718.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of tools to measure dignity for older people in acute hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelle Tauber‐Gilmore
  • Christine Norton
  • Sue Procter
  • Trevor Murrells
  • Gulen Addis
  • Lesley Baillie
  • Pauline Velasco
  • Preet Athwal
  • Saeema Kayani
  • Zainab Zahran

Abstract

Background Dignity is a concept that applies to all patients. Older patients can be particularly vulnerable to experiencing a loss of dignity in hospital. Previous tools developed to measure dignity have been aimed at palliative and end‐of‐life care. No tools for measuring dignity in acute hospital care have been reported. Objectives To develop tools for measuring patient dignity in acute hospitals. Setting A large UK acute hospital. We purposively selected 17 wards where at least 50% of patients are 65 years or above. Methods Three methods of capturing data related to dignity were developed: an electronic patient dignity survey (possible score range 6–24); a format for nonparticipant observations; and individual face‐to‐face semi‐structured patient and staff interviews (reported elsewhere). Results A total of 5,693 surveys were completed. Mean score increased from 22.00 pre‐intervention to 23.03 after intervention (p

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelle Tauber‐Gilmore & Christine Norton & Sue Procter & Trevor Murrells & Gulen Addis & Lesley Baillie & Pauline Velasco & Preet Athwal & Saeema Kayani & Zainab Zahran, 2018. "Development of tools to measure dignity for older people in acute hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3706-3718, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3706-3718
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14490
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14490
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14490?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zainab Zahran & Marcelle Tauber & Holly Howe Watson & Phoebe Coghlan & Sarah White & Sue Procter & Gulen Addis & Christine Norton, 2016. "Systematic review: what interventions improve dignity for older patients in hospital?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(3-4), pages 311-321, February.
    2. Jacobson, Nora, 2007. "Dignity and health: A review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 292-302, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annamaria Bagnasco & Milko Zanini & Nicoletta Dasso & Silvia Rossi & Fiona Timmins & Miss Carolina Galanti & Giuseppe Aleo & Gianluca Catania & Loredana Sasso, 2020. "Dignity, privacy, respect and choice—A scoping review of measurement of these concepts within acute healthcare practice," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(11-12), pages 1832-1857, June.
    2. Nurfika Asmaningrum & Dini Kurniawati & Yun‐Fang Tsai, 2020. "Threats to patient dignity in clinical care settings: A qualitative comparison of Indonesian nurses and patients," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 899-908, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcelle Tauber‐Gilmore & Gulen Addis & Zainab Zahran & Sally Black & Lesley Baillie & Sue Procter & Christine Norton, 2018. "The views of older people and health professionals about dignity in acute hospital care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 223-234, January.
    2. Sanchez, Mari & Lamont, Michèle & Zilberstein, Shira, 2022. "How American college students understand social resilience and navigate towards the future during covid and the movement for racial justice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    3. Gibson, Barbara E. & Secker, Barbara & Rolfe, Debbie & Wagner, Frank & Parke, Bob & Mistry, Bhavnita, 2012. "Disability and dignity-enabling home environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(2), pages 211-219.
    4. Winchenbach, Anke & Hanna, Paul & Miller, Graham, 2022. "Constructing identity in marine tourism diversification," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Simone S M Ho & Alice N L Kwong & Karen W S Wan & Rosita M L Ho & Ka Ming Chow, 2017. "Experiences of aromatherapy massage among adult female cancer patients: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4519-4526, December.
    6. Chabot, Boudewijn E. & Goedhart, Arnold, 2009. "A survey of self-directed dying attended by proxies in the Dutch population," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1745-1751, May.
    7. Debra Kerr & Rosie Crone & Trisha Dunning, 2020. "Perspectives about dignity during acute care for older people and their relatives: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4116-4127, November.
    8. Munoz, Sarah-Anne & Macaden, Leah & Kyle, Richard & Webster, Elaine, 2017. "Revealing student nurses' perceptions of human dignity through curriculum co-design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 1-8.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:19-20:p:3706-3718. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.