IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i21-22p4217-4226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study

Author

Listed:
  • Anliu Nie
  • Xiangfen Su
  • Shuzeng Zhang
  • Wenjie Guan
  • Jianfeng Li

Abstract

Aims and objectives This study aimed to portray the prevalence and associated factors of psychological distress among frontline nurses during COVID‐19 outbreak. Background The COVID‐19 outbreak has posed great threat to public health worldwide. Nurses fighting against the epidemic on the frontline might be under great physical and psychological distress. This psychological distress was predominantly described as sleep disturbance, symptoms of anxiety and depression, post‐traumatic stress, inability to make decisions and even somatic symptoms. Design Cross‐sectional study. Methods Frontline nurses from designated hospitals for COVID‐19 patients were invited to complete an online survey by convenience sampling, and the survey included six main sections: the General Health Questionnaire, the Perceived Social Support Scale, the Simplified Coping Style Scale, the Impact of Event Scale‐Revised, socio‐demographic, occupation and work history. Multiple logistic analysis was used to identify the potential risk factors of psychological distress. The study methods were compliant with the STROBE checklist. Results Of the 263 frontline nurses, 66 (25.1%) were identified as psychological distress. Multiple logistic analysis revealed that working in emergency department, concern for family, being treated differently, negative coping style and COVID‐19‐related stress symptom were positive related to psychological distress. Perceived more social support and effective precautionary measures were negatively associated with psychological distress. Conclusions The study demonstrated that COVID‐19 had a significant psychological impact on frontline nurses. Early detection of psychological distress and supportive intervention should be taken according to the associated factors to prevent more serious psychological impact on frontline nurses. Relevance to clinical practice This study highlighted that the frontline nurses were suffering from varying degrees of psychological distress, which needed early screening and supportive intervention for preventing more serious psychological impact on frontline nurses. Beside, more specific measurement should be combined with the GHQ‐12 to assess the varying degrees of psychological distress in frontline nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Anliu Nie & Xiangfen Su & Shuzeng Zhang & Wenjie Guan & Jianfeng Li, 2020. "Psychological impact of COVID‐19 outbreak on frontline nurses: A cross‐sectional survey study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4217-4226, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4217-4226
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15454
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15454?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlos A Laranjeira, 2012. "The effects of perceived stress and ways of coping in a sample of Portuguese health workers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(11‐12), pages 1755-1762, June.
    2. Sajed Faisal Ghawadra & Khatijah Lim Abdullah & Wan Yuen Choo & Cheng Kar Phang, 2019. "Mindfulness‐based stress reduction for psychological distress among nurses: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3747-3758, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ángel García-Tudela & Agustín Javier Simonelli-Muñoz & José Miguel Rivera-Caravaca & María Isabel Fortea & Lucas Simón-Sánchez & María Teresa Rodríguez González-Moro & José Miguel Rodríguez González-M, 2022. "Stress in Emergency Healthcare Professionals: The Stress Factors and Manifestations Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Shalini Dananja Wanninayake & Michael O’Donnell & Sue Williamson, 2022. "COVID-19 and job demands and resources experienced by nurses in Sri Lanka," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(1), pages 100-116, March.
    3. María del Mar Molero-Jurado & María del Carmen Pérez-Fuentes & José Jesús Gázquez-Linares & Azucena Santillán García, 2021. "Coping Strategies as a Mental Health Protection Factor of Spanish Nurses during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-10, December.
    4. Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez & J. Ángel García-Álvarez & Esperanza García-Marín & María Gutierrez-Serrano & Maria José M. Alférez & Guillermo Ramirez-Vargas, 2021. "Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Nurses and Auxiliary Nursing Care Technicians—A Voluntary Online Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Buthaina al Falasi & Mouza al Mazrouei & Mai al Ali & Maithah al Dhamani & Aisha al Ali & Mariam al Kindi & Murat Dalkilinc & Mai al Qubaisi & Luciana Aparecida Campos & Hashel al Tunaiji & Ovidiu Con, 2021. "Prevalence and Determinants of Immediate and Long-Term PTSD Consequences of Coronavirus-Related (CoV-1 and CoV-2) Pandemics among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Siu-Ling Chan & Naomi Takemura & Pui-Hing Chau & Chia-Chin Lin & Man-Ping Wang, 2021. "Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Licensed Full-Time Practicing Nurses Undertaking Part-Time Studies in Higher Education: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji-Young Lim & Geun-Myun Kim & Eun-Joo Kim, 2022. "Factors Associated with Job Stress among Hospital Nurses: A Meta-Correlation Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Emilia I. De la Fuente‐Solana & Nora Suleiman‐Martos & Almudena Velando‐Soriano & Gustavo R. Cañadas‐De la Fuente & Blanca Herrera‐Cabrerizo & Luis Albendín‐García, 2021. "Predictors of burnout of health professionals in the departments of maternity and gynaecology, and its association with personality factors: A multicentre study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1-2), pages 207-216, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:21-22:p:4217-4226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.