IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i17-18p3363-3372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relationship between effort–reward imbalance and empathy among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional online survey

Author

Listed:
  • Lingling Kong
  • Wencai Li
  • Hongmei Wang
  • Ning Xu
  • Qing Xu
  • Li Sun
  • Hongying Chen
  • Jiangtao Liu
  • Yongxia Bi
  • Peter Szto

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the factors that influence nurses empathy towards patients and to explore its influence on effort–reward imbalance involving empathy. Background Empathy is highly valued in nurse–patient relationships. However, currently, little evidence currently exists on the impact of work‐related stress measured by effort–reward imbalance and empathy. Design An anonymous, cross‐sectional online survey using a sample of convenient was conducted. Methods Convenient online sampling was conducted with select nurses from seven cities in Shandong province, China. The nurses worked in clinical settings in 10 different hospitals. Two questionnaires, for example the Effort‐Reward Imbalance Questionnaire and the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy, were used. Medians, percentages, related analysis and regression analysis were used to measure the relationship between Effort‐Reward Imbalance and empathy levels among nurses in China. In addition, this study adhered to the EQUATOR checklist, STROBE (see Supplementary file 1). Results Among 1,077 participants, 26.5% stated experiencing an Effort‐Reward Imbalance, with a mean empathy score among Chinese nurses, was 109.78 ± 13.98. Multiple regression analysis revealed that females and head nurses had higher levels of empathy, and that those who had no experience learning about empathy‐related courses and an Effort‐Reward Imbalance ratio were negatively associated with empathy. Conclusions Gender, department, position, experience learning about empathy‐related courses and Effort‐Reward Imbalance ratio were significant elements related to nurses’ empathy levels. Relevance to clinical practice As we all know, empathy can affect the relationship between nurse and patient. If nurses are in an Effort‐Reward Imbalance, they may have less empathy. It is advised to improve the reward level of nurses, so that the level of empathy towards patients is enhanced.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingling Kong & Wencai Li & Hongmei Wang & Ning Xu & Qing Xu & Li Sun & Hongying Chen & Jiangtao Liu & Yongxia Bi & Peter Szto, 2020. "The relationship between effort–reward imbalance and empathy among clinical nurses: A cross‐sectional online survey," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(17-18), pages 3363-3372, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3363-3372
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15367
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Fang & Li‐Ping Hsiao & Shu‐Hui Fang & Bao‐Chen Chen, 2019. "Associations of work stress and humor with health status in hospital nurses—A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(19-20), pages 3691-3699, October.
    2. Siegrist, Johannes & Starke, Dagmar & Chandola, Tarani & Godin, Isabelle & Marmot, Michael & Niedhammer, Isabelle & Peter, Richard, 2004. "The measurement of effort-reward imbalance at work: European comparisons," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(8), pages 1483-1499, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nektaria Nicolakakis & Maude Lafantaisie & Marie-Claude Letellier & Caroline Biron & Michel Vézina & Nathalie Jauvin & Maryline Vivion & Mariève Pelletier, 2022. "Are Organizational Interventions Effective in Protecting Healthcare Worker Mental Health during Epidemics/Pandemics? A Systematic Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Liebig, Stefan & Schupp, Jürgen, 2008. "Leistungs- oder Bedarfsgerechtigkeit? Über einen normativen Zielkonflikt des Wohlfahrtsstaats und seiner Bedeutung für die Bewertung des eigenen Erwerbseinkommens," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 7-30.
    3. Mandy Schult & Verena Tobsch, 2012. "Freizeitstress: wenn die Arbeit ständig ruft," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 485, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    4. Jean-Baptist du Prel & Johannes Siegrist & Daniela Borchart, 2019. "The Role of Leisure-Time Physical Activity in the Change of Work-Related Stress (ERI) over Time," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-9, December.
    5. João Silvestre da Silva-Junior & Frida Marina Fischer, 2014. "Long-Term Sickness Absence Due to Mental Disorders Is Associated with Individual Features and Psychosocial Work Conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Tophoven, Silke & Wurdack, Anja & Rauch, Angela & Munkert, Casandra & Bauer, Ulrike, 2016. "lidA - leben in der Arbeit : German cohort study on work, age and health. Documentation for waves 1 and 2," FDZ Datenreport. Documentation on Labour Market Data 201601_en, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].
    7. Elisabeth Maria Balint & Peter Angerer & Harald Guendel & Birgitt Marten-Mittag & Marc N. Jarczok, 2022. "Stress Management Intervention for Leaders Increases Nighttime SDANN: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-12, March.
    8. Rugulies, Reiner & Krause, Niklas, 2005. "Job strain, iso-strain, and the incidence of low back and neck injuries. A 7.5-year prospective study of San Francisco transit operators," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 27-39, July.
    9. Sara Brolin Låftman & Maria Granvik Saminathen & Bitte Modin & Petra Löfstedt, 2021. "Excellent Self-Rated Health among Swedish Boys and Girls and Its Relationship with Working Conditions in School: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-9, February.
    10. Thierry Debrand & Pascale Lengagne, 2007. "Organisation du travail et sante des seniors en Europe," Working Papers DT3, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Feb 2007.
    11. Yi-Shih Chung & Paul Tae-Woo Lee & Jeong-Kwan Lee, 2017. "Burnout in seafarers: its antecedents and effects on incidents at sea," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 916-931, October.
    12. Stefan Hochguertel, 2010. "Self-Employment around Retirement Age," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-067/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Ågotnes, Kari Wik & Skogstad, Anders & Hetland, Jørn & Olsen, Olav Kjellevold & Espevik, Roar & Bakker, Arnold B. & Einarsen, Ståle Valvatne, 2021. "Daily work pressure and exposure to bullying-related negative acts: The role of daily transformational and laissez-faire leadership," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 423-433.
    14. Viktor Soltes & Jozef Kubas & Andrej Velas & David Michalík, 2021. "Occupational Safety of Municipal Police Officers: Assessing the Vulnerability and Riskiness of Police Officers’ Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Simone Schneider & Jürgen Schupp, 2014. "Individual Differences in Social Comparison and its Consequences for Life Satisfaction: Introducing a Short Scale of the Iowa–Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 115(2), pages 767-789, January.
    16. Adam R. Szromek & Radosław Wolniak, 2020. "Job Satisfaction and Problems among Academic Staff in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-38, June.
    17. Jantien van Berkel & Cécile R L Boot & Karin I Proper & Paulien M Bongers & Allard J van der Beek, 2014. "Effectiveness of a Worksite Mindfulness-Related Multi-Component Health Promotion Intervention on Work Engagement and Mental Health: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    18. Sam Popple & Kïrsten Way & Richard Johnstone & Richard Croucher & Peta Miller, 2023. "A comparative analysis of Inspector responses to complaints about psychosocial and physical hazards," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(1), pages 234-249, January.
    19. Meneton, Pierre & Hoertel, Nicolas & Wiernik, Emmanuel & Lemogne, Cédric & Ribet, Céline & Bonenfant, Sébastien & Ménard, Joël & Goldberg, Marcel & Zins, Marie, 2018. "Work environment mediates a large part of social inequalities in the incidence of several common cardiovascular risk factors: Findings from the Gazel cohort," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 59-66.
    20. Jing Liao & Eric J Brunner & Meena Kumari, 2013. "Is There an Association between Work Stress and Diurnal Cortisol Patterns? Findings from the Whitehall II Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-8, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:17-18:p:3363-3372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.