IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v29y2020i15-16p2907-2917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Studying physiology within a flipped classroom: The importance of on‐campus activities for nursing students’ experiences of mastery

Author

Listed:
  • Hanne Maria Bingen
  • Simen A. Steindal
  • Rune Johan Krumsvik
  • Bodil Tveit

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore the on‐campus activities of the flipped classroom and their role in nursing students’ experiences of mastering physiology. Background A nurse must be confident in their knowledge of physiology to feel confident as a nurse. However, many nursing students do not believe in their ability to master physiology. The flipped classroom design could facilitate active learning and promote students’ confidence and competence in physiology. Design A design‐based research design was employed. Methods Twenty‐three nursing students enrolled in an anatomy and physiology course participated in two focus group interviews and wrote two individual reflective notes. The data were analysed by means of systematic text condensation and activity theory. Reporting was guided by the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies (COREQ). Results The study findings underscore the importance of careful design of on‐campus activities within the flipped classroom to support students’ experiences of mastery in physiology. Four themes were identified: (a) preparation which builds a foundation for learning; (b) the use of digital tools; (c) learning through dialogue with peers; and (d) experience of the expected learning outcomes. Conclusions On‐campus learning activities within a flipped classroom design could support students’ experiences of confidence in and mastery of physiology. However, the study participants found learner‐centred activities challenging and described feeling doubtful of their ability to master physiology. A didactic framework could take into account the circumstance that students perceive educational technology differently. When designing on‐campus activities, emphasis should be placed on collaboration rather than competition to help students develop confidence in their knowledge of physiology. Relevance to clinical practice It is important to support nursing students’ knowledge acquisition in bioscience and their development of confidence as these skills could enhance their clinical judgment in practice. Comprehension of bioscience is necessary to provide safe patient care and competent nursing.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanne Maria Bingen & Simen A. Steindal & Rune Johan Krumsvik & Bodil Tveit, 2020. "Studying physiology within a flipped classroom: The importance of on‐campus activities for nursing students’ experiences of mastery," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(15-16), pages 2907-2917, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2907-2917
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15308
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.15308?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vanessa Taylor & Sarah Ashelford & Patricia Fell & Penelope J Goacher, 2015. "Biosciences in nurse education: is the curriculum fit for practice? Lecturers' views and recommendations from across the UK," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2797-2806, October.
    2. Kari Toverud Jensen & Unni Knutstad & Tonks N. Fawcett, 2018. "The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1793-1802, May.
    3. Jane Koch & Lucie M. Ramjan & Bronwyn Everett & Anna Maceri & Kate Bell & Yenna Salamonson, 2020. "“Sage on the stage or guide on the side”—Undergraduate nursing students’ experiences and expectations of bioscience tutors in a blended learning curriculum: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5-6), pages 863-871, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher J. Gordon & Peter B. Hudson & Mark B. Plenderleith & Murray Fisher & Judy A. Craft, 2017. "Final year Australian nursing students’ experiences with bioscience: A cross‐sectional survey," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(1), pages 22-28, March.
    2. Tonks N. Fawcett & Anne Waugh & Graeme D. Smith, 2016. "Editorial: The primacy of the biosciences: a forgotten priority in nurse education?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2680-2682, September.
    3. Kari Toverud Jensen & Unni Knutstad & Tonks N. Fawcett, 2018. "The challenge of the biosciences in nurse education: A literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(9-10), pages 1793-1802, May.
    4. Patricia Lynne Fell & Kerry Dobbins & Philip Dee, 2016. "Bioscience learning in clinical placement: the experiences of pre‐registration nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(17-18), pages 2694-2705, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:29:y:2020:i:15-16:p:2907-2917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.