IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i15-16p3104-3114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Salzmann‐Erikson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To explore and describe the cultural routine of shift reports among nursing staff in a psychiatric intensive care unit and further to develop a taxonomic, thematic and theoretical understanding of the process. Background Lack of communication among healthcare staff is associated with risks for medical errors. Thus, handovers and shift reports are an essential and integral routine among nurses to pass on information about the patients’ health status. Previous studies within the field have highlighted the benefits of structured reporting tools. However, shift reports as a cultural activity within the nursing tradition have been given less attention, not the least in psychiatric care. Methods Focused ethnography was used. The data comprised 20 observational sessions. The observations ranged over a time span of 5 months and were conducted in a psychiatric intensive care unit in Sweden. Results The process of shift reports encompassed the following three phases: (a) getting settled, (b) giving the report and (c) engaging in the aftermath. The results demonstrate that the phases entail different cultural activities, which take place in different areas of the ward and that the level of formality varied. Conclusions Shift reports are not an isolated event with clear boundaries. The study enriches the understanding of shift reports as a “fuzzy process”. The individual phases were found to be tied to cultural connotations, such as activities, places and roles with certain meanings for staff members. Relevance to clinical practice The new insights are useful for nurses in overcoming an uncritical adoption of the biomedical tradition regarding pace and tone during shift reports. The reporting nurse has the potential to transform shift reports from a monologue with a foreclosed style to a more dialogical interaction with colleagues that focuses on the patients’ needs rather than the needs of staff.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2018. "Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3104-3114, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3104-3114
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14502
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.14502?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Niels Buus & Bente Hoeck & Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, 2017. "Nurses’ shift reports: a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2891-2906, October.
    2. Ruth Clemow, 2006. "Care plans as the main focus of nursing handover: information exchange model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1463-1465, November.
    3. Cheryl Holly & Eileen B Poletick, 2014. "A systematic review on the transfer of information during nurse transitions in care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2387-2396, September.
    4. Laura Iozzino & Clarissa Ferrari & Matthew Large & Olav Nielssen & Giovanni de Girolamo, 2015. "Prevalence and Risk Factors of Violence by Psychiatric Acute Inpatients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Salzmann-Erikson & Lilly Yifter, 2020. "Risk Factors and Triggers That May Result in Patient-Initiated Violence on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: An Integrative Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 504-520, September.
    2. Fritz Frauenfelder & Theo van Achterberg & Maria Müller Staub, 2018. "Nursing diagnoses related to psychiatric adult inpatient care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(3-4), pages 463-475, February.
    3. Niels Buus & Bente Hoeck & Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, 2017. "Nurses’ shift reports: a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2891-2906, October.
    4. Shu-Fen Niu & Shu-Fen Kuo & Hsiu-Ting Tsai & Ching-Chiu Kao & Victoria Traynor & Kuei-Ru Chou, 2019. "Prevalence of workplace violent episodes experienced by nurses in acute psychiatric settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Patricia S. Groves & Kirstin A. Manges & Jill Scott-Cawiezell, 2016. "Handing Off Safety at the Bedside," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(5), pages 473-493, October.
    6. Tove Giske & Sunniva Nese Melås & Kari Anne Einarsen, 2018. "The art of oral handovers: A participant observational study by undergraduate students in a hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 767-775, March.
    7. Suna Yalcin & Hulya Bilgin, 2019. "Risk predictions of physical aggression in acute psychiatric wards: Findings of a prospective study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(3), pages 316-322, September.
    8. Jack Pun & Engle Angela Chan & Manbo Man & Suanne Eggins & Diana Slade, 2019. "Pre‐ and post evaluations of the effects of the Connect, Ask, Respond and Empathise (CARE) protocol on nursing handover: A case study of a bilingual hospital in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3001-3011, August.
    9. Line Melby & Berit J Brattheim & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2015. "Patients in transition – improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3389-3399, December.
    10. Kristina Eivergård & Ingela Enmarker & Mona Livholts & Lena Aléx & Ove Hellzén, 2020. "Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4227-4238, November.
    11. Stacey Bradley & Sarah Mott, 2014. "Adopting a patient‐centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1927-1936, July.
    12. McKnight, Jacob & Nzinga, Jacinta & Jepkosgei, Joyline & English, Mike, 2020. "Collective strategies to cope with work related stress among nurses in resource constrained settings: An ethnography of neonatal nursing in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. In Ok Sim & Kyoung Min Ahn & Eun Jeong Hwang, 2020. "Experiences of Psychiatric Nurses Who Care for Patients with Physical and Psychological Violence: A Phenomenological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:15-16:p:3104-3114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.