IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p2891-2906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ shift reports: a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field studies

Author

Listed:
  • Niels Buus
  • Bente Hoeck
  • Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton

Abstract

Aims and objectives To identify reporting practices that feature in studies of nurses’ shift reports across diverse nursing specialities. The objectives were to perform an exhaustive systematic literature search and to critically review the quality and findings of qualitative field studies of nurses’ shift reports. Background Nurses’ shift reports are routine occurrences in healthcare organisations that are viewed as crucial for patient outcomes, patient safety and continuity of care. Studies of communication between nurses attend primarily to 1:1 communication and analyse the adequacy and accuracy of patient information and feature handovers at the bedside. Still, verbal reports between groups of nurses about patients are commonplace. Shift reports are obvious sites for studying the situated accomplishment of professional nursing at the group level. This review is focused exclusively on qualitative field research for nuanced and contextualised insights into nurses’ everyday shift reporting practices. Design The study is a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field analyses of nurses’ shift reports. We searched in the databases CIHAHL, PubMed and PsycINFO and identified and reviewed 19 articles published 1992–2014. Data were systematically extracted using criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research reports. Results The studies described shift report practices and identified several factors contributing to distribution of clinical knowledge. Shift report practices were described as highly conventionalised and locally situated, but with occasional opportunities for improvisation and negotiation between nurses. Finally, shift reports were described as multifunctional meetings, with individual and social effects for nurses and teams. Conclusion Innovations in between‐shift communications can benefit from this analysis, by providing for the many functions of handovers that are revealed in field studies. Relevance to clinical practice Leaders and practising nurses may consider what are the best opportunities for nurses to work up clinical knowledge and negotiate care.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Buus & Bente Hoeck & Bridget Elizabeth Hamilton, 2017. "Nurses’ shift reports: a systematic literature search and critical review of qualitative field studies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 2891-2906, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:2891-2906
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13655
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13655?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michèle Grosjean, 2004. "From multi-participant talk to genuine polylogue. Shift-change briefing sessions at the hospital," Post-Print hal-00262717, HAL.
    2. Cheryl Holly & Eileen B Poletick, 2014. "A systematic review on the transfer of information during nurse transitions in care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(17-18), pages 2387-2396, September.
    3. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    4. Sandra Braaf & Sascha Rixon & Allison Williams & Danny Liew & Elizabeth Manias, 2015. "Medication communication during handover interactions in specialty practice settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2859-2870, October.
    5. Judith Anderson & Linda Malone & Kerry Shanahan & Jennifer Manning, 2015. "Nursing bedside clinical handover – an integrated review of issues and tools," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 662-671, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Salzmann-Erikson & Lilly Yifter, 2020. "Risk Factors and Triggers That May Result in Patient-Initiated Violence on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: An Integrative Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 504-520, September.
    2. Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2018. "Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3104-3114, August.
    3. Kristina Eivergård & Ingela Enmarker & Mona Livholts & Lena Aléx & Ove Hellzén, 2020. "Subordinated masculinities: A critical inquiry into reproduction of gender norms in handovers and rounds in a forensic psychiatric care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(21-22), pages 4227-4238, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tove Giske & Sunniva Nese Melås & Kari Anne Einarsen, 2018. "The art of oral handovers: A participant observational study by undergraduate students in a hospital setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5-6), pages 767-775, March.
    2. Maree Johnson & Paula Sanchez & Catherine Zheng, 2016. "The impact of an integrated nursing handover system on nurses' satisfaction and work practices," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    3. Da-Hye Lee & Eun-Ju Lim, 2021. "Effect of a Simulation-Based Handover Education Program for Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Design," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Mary F. Forde & Alice Coffey & Josephine Hegarty, 2020. "Bedside handover at the change of nursing shift: A mixed‐methods study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3731-3742, October.
    5. Patricia S. Groves & Kirstin A. Manges & Jill Scott-Cawiezell, 2016. "Handing Off Safety at the Bedside," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 25(5), pages 473-493, October.
    6. Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2018. "Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3104-3114, August.
    7. Torunn Kitty Vatnøy & Tor‐Ivar Karlsen & Bjørg Dale, 2019. "Exploring nursing competence to care for older patients in municipal in‐patient acute care: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3339-3352, September.
    8. Anna Kullberg & Lena Sharp & Hemming Johansson & Yvonne Brandberg & Mia Bergenmar, 2019. "Improved patient satisfaction 2 years after introducing person‐centred handover in an oncological inpatient care setting," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(17-18), pages 3262-3270, September.
    9. Jack Pun & Engle Angela Chan & Manbo Man & Suanne Eggins & Diana Slade, 2019. "Pre‐ and post evaluations of the effects of the Connect, Ask, Respond and Empathise (CARE) protocol on nursing handover: A case study of a bilingual hospital in Hong Kong," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(15-16), pages 3001-3011, August.
    10. Tiina Syyrilä & Katri Vehviläinen‐Julkunen & Marja Härkänen, 2020. "Communication issues contributing to medication incidents: Mixed‐method analysis of hospitals’ incident reports using indicator phrases based on literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(13-14), pages 2466-2481, July.
    11. Line Melby & Berit J Brattheim & Ragnhild Hellesø, 2015. "Patients in transition – improving hospital–home care collaboration through electronic messaging: providers’ perspectives," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3389-3399, December.
    12. McKnight, Jacob & Nzinga, Jacinta & Jepkosgei, Joyline & English, Mike, 2020. "Collective strategies to cope with work related stress among nurses in resource constrained settings: An ethnography of neonatal nursing in Kenya," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:2891-2906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.