IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v23y2014i13-14p1927-1936.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adopting a patient‐centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals

Author

Listed:
  • Stacey Bradley
  • Sarah Mott

Abstract

Aims and objectives To study empirically the process and outcomes of the implementation of nurse‐to‐nurse bedside handover in three rural South Australian hospitals. Background While the importance of handover is identified in literature, little is written about its implementation. It is, however, suggested that bedside handover is a more patient‐focussed approach than others available. Design A mixed‐method, pretest post‐test evaluative approach involving quasi‐experimental and ethnographic elements was used. The self‐selected sample comprised nine inpatients (five women, four men) and forty‐eight self‐selected enrolled/registered nursing staff (forty‐seven women, one man) from three acute hospital wards in rural South Australia. Lewin's (Human Relations, 1, 1947a, 2; Readings in Social Psychology. Henry Holt, New York, 1947b, 197) 3‐stage model of change provided a theoretical basis and structure for the study. Methods Patient perceptions were obtained using ethnographic interviewing. Staff perceptions of patient involvement were obtained through questions rated on a 7‐point Likert scale and ethnographic interviewing. Results Results indicated that patients preferred the bedside handover method over the traditional closed‐door office handover approach. The key differences (as defined by patients) are that the bedside handover process incorporates social aspects for the patient, patients have the opportunity to know who is looking after them and patients are included in discussion related to their care. Furthermore, results suggest that staff believed the level of patient involvement in their care had increased under the bedside handover process. Conclusions The results demonstrate that both patients and staff perceive patients to be more involved in their care under the bedside handover approach. The literature notes a recent move towards adopting patient‐centred care approaches in clinical settings and the many benefits associated with this style of care. This study has proven that implementing bedside handover has resulted in a patient‐centred approach. Relevance to clinical practice This study generates further knowledge about rural nursing and contributes insight into the importance of handover implementation method – areas that are not widely documented in existing literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Stacey Bradley & Sarah Mott, 2014. "Adopting a patient‐centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(13-14), pages 1927-1936, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:13-14:p:1927-1936
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12403
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruth Clemow, 2006. "Care plans as the main focus of nursing handover: information exchange model," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(11), pages 1463-1465, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Salzmann‐Erikson, 2018. "Using focused ethnography to explore and describe the process of nurses’ shift reports in a psychiatric intensive care unit," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3104-3114, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:23:y:2014:i:13-14:p:1927-1936. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.