IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i23-24p3974-3989.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurse–physician communication – An integrated review

Author

Listed:
  • Tit‐Chai Tan
  • Huaqiong Zhou
  • Michelle Kelly

Abstract

Aim and objective To present a comprehensive review of current evidence on the factors which impact on nurse–physician communication and interventions developed to improve nurse–physician communication. Background The challenges in nurse–physician communication persist since the term ‘nurse‐doctor game’ was first used in 1967, leading to poor patient outcomes such as treatment delays and potential patient harm. Inconsistent evidence was found on the factors and interventions which foster or impair effective nurse–physician communication. Design An integrative review was conducted following a five‐stage process: problem identification, literature search, data evaluation, data analysis and presentation. Methods Five electronic databases were searched from 2005 to April 2016 using key search terms: “improve*,” “nurse‐physician,” “nurse,” “physician” and “communication” in five electronic databases including the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Direct and Scopus. Results A total of 22 studies were included in the review. Four themes emerged from the data synthesis, namely communication styles; factors that facilitate nurse–physician communication; barriers to effective nurse–physician communication; and interventions to improve nurse–physician communication. Conclusion This integrative review suggests that nurse–physician communication still remains ineffective. Current interventions only address information needs of nurses and physicians in limited situations and specific settings but cannot adequately address the interprofessional communication skills that are lacking in practice. The disparate views of nurses and physicians on communication due to differing training backgrounds confound the effectiveness of current interventions or strategies. Relevance to clinical practice Cross‐training and interprofessional educational from undergraduate to postgraduate programmes will better align the training of nurses and physicians to communicate effectively. Further research is needed to determine the feasibility and generalisability of interventions, such as localising physicians and using communication tools, to improve nurse–physician communication. Organisational and cultural changes are needed to overcome ingrained practices impeding nurse–physician communication.

Suggested Citation

  • Tit‐Chai Tan & Huaqiong Zhou & Michelle Kelly, 2017. "Nurse–physician communication – An integrated review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3974-3989, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3974-3989
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13832
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Els Bryon & Chris Gastmans & Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé, 2012. "Nurse–physician communication concerning artificial nutrition or hydration (ANH) in patients with dementia: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(19pt20), pages 2975-2984, October.
    2. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 898-909, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucyna Iwanow & Mariusz Jaworski & Joanna Gotlib & Mariusz Panczyk, 2021. "A Model of Factors Determining Nurses’ Attitudes towards Learning Communicative Competences," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Normand Carpentier, 2013. "Entry Into a Care Trajectory," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, June.
    2. Liberati, Elisa Giulia & Gorli, Mara & Scaratti, Giuseppe, 2016. "Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 31-39.
    3. Macinati, Manuela S. & Bozzi, Stefano & Rizzo, Marco Giovanni, 2016. "Budgetary participation and performance: The mediating effects of medical managers’ job engagement and self-efficacy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 1017-1028.
    4. Liberati, Elisa Giulia, 2017. "Separating, replacing, intersecting: The influence of context on the construction of the medical-nursing boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 135-143.
    5. Caronia, Letizia & Saglietti, Marzia & Chieregato, Arturo, 2020. "Challenging the interprofessional epistemic boundaries: The practices of informing in nurse-physician interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Keh Kiong Ong & Kit Cheng Ting & Yeow Leng Chow, 2018. "The trajectory of experience of critical care nurses in providing end‐of‐life care: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    7. Standing, Holly & Patterson, Rebecca & Dalkin, Sonia & Exley, Catherine & Brittain, Katie, 2020. "A critical exploration of professional jurisdictions and role boundaries in inter-professional end-of-life care in the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    8. Degeling, Chris & Carroll, Jane & Denholm, Justin & Marais, Ben & Dawson, Angus, 2020. "Ending TB in Australia: Organizational challenges for regional tuberculosis programs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 106-112.
    9. Skyberg, Henriette Lund & Innvaer, Simon, 2020. "Dynamics of interprofessional teamwork: Why three logics are better than one," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    10. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    11. Kuijper, Syb & Felder, Martijn & Clegg, Stewart & Bal, Roland & Wallenburg, Iris, 2024. "“We don't experiment with our patients!” An ethnographic account of the epistemic politics of (re)designing nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    12. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2012. "The politics of action research: “If you don't like the way things are going, get off the bus”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1946-1953.
    13. Ludwig Kuntz & Stefan Scholtes, 2013. "Physicians in leadership: the association between medical director involvement and staff-to-patient ratios," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 129-138, June.
    14. Altomonte, Guillermina, 2022. "Coordinating illness and insurance trajectories: Evidence from a post-acute care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    15. Graeme Currie & Charlotte Croft, 2015. "Examining hybrid nurse managers as a case of identity transition in healthcare: developing a balanced research agenda," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(5), pages 855-865, October.
    16. Miner, Skye A., 2019. "Demarcating the dirty work: Canadian Fertility professionals’ use of boundary-work in contentious egg donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 19-26.
    17. Xyrichis, Andreas & Lowton, Karen & Rafferty, Anne Marie, 2017. "Accomplishing professional jurisdiction in intensive care: An ethnographic study of three units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 102-111.
    18. Wei Liu & Marie Gerdtz & Elizabeth Manias, 2016. "Creating opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and patient‐centred care: how nurses, doctors, pharmacists and patients use communication strategies when managing medications in an acute ho," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2943-2957, October.
    19. Bridgette Wessels & Jo Taylor & Lizzie Coates, 2017. "Telehealth in Community Nursing: A Negotiated Order," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 152-168, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:23-24:p:3974-3989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.