IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p257-268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The trajectory of experience of critical care nurses in providing end‐of‐life care: A qualitative descriptive study

Author

Listed:
  • Keh Kiong Ong
  • Kit Cheng Ting
  • Yeow Leng Chow

Abstract

Aims and objectives To understand the perceptions of critical care nurses towards providing end‐of‐life care. Background There has been an increasing interest in end‐of‐life care in the critical care setting. In Singapore, approximately half of deaths in the hospital occur during critical care. While nurses are well positioned to provide end‐of‐life care to patients and their family members, they faced barriers to providing end‐of‐life care. Also, providing end‐of‐life care has profound positive and negative psychological effects on nurses, with the latter being more prominent. Design Qualitative descriptive design. Method Data collection was performed in a medical intensive care unit of a public tertiary hospital in Singapore. Ten registered nurses were purposively sampled and interviewed individually using a semi‐structured interview guide. A codebook was developed to guide coding, and data were thematically analysed. Rigour was maintained. Results Nurses went through a trajectory of experience. They experienced the culture of care and developed dissatisfaction with it. The tension shaped their perception and meaning of life and death, and they developed mechanisms to reach resolution. Conclusion This study provides insight on nurses’ perception as a trajectory of experience and raised several implications on clinical practice, policy and research. There is a need to alleviate the tension nurses face and to facilitate coming to terms with the tension by improving the culture of care and supporting nurses. Relevance to clinical practice Nurses could be involved more in decision‐making and empowered to start end‐of‐life care conversations within the team and with family members. Communication with family members and between nurses and doctors could be improved. Support for nurses providing end‐of‐life care could be enhanced through promoting social networks, education and bereavement support. Further research is needed to explore ways to support and empower nurses to provide end‐of‐life care in critical care.

Suggested Citation

  • Keh Kiong Ong & Kit Cheng Ting & Yeow Leng Chow, 2018. "The trajectory of experience of critical care nurses in providing end‐of‐life care: A qualitative descriptive study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 257-268, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:257-268
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13882
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13882?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Kowalski & Oliver Ommen & Elke Driller & Nicole Ernstmann & Markus A Wirtz & Thorsten Köhler & Holger Pfaff, 2010. "Burnout in nurses – the relationship between social capital in hospitals and emotional exhaustion," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(11‐12), pages 1654-1663, June.
    2. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Westbrook, Johanna & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "How and where clinicians exercise power: Interprofessional relations in health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 898-909, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Tsounis & Despoina Xanthopoulou & Evangelia Demerouti & Konstantinos Kafetsios & Ioannis Tsaousis, 2023. "Workplace Social Capital: Redefining and Measuring the Construct," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 165(2), pages 555-583, January.
    2. Normand Carpentier, 2013. "Entry Into a Care Trajectory," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(2), pages 21582440134, June.
    3. Powell, Alison E. & Davies, Huw T.O., 2012. "The struggle to improve patient care in the face of professional boundaries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 807-814.
    4. Kuijper, Syb & Felder, Martijn & Clegg, Stewart & Bal, Roland & Wallenburg, Iris, 2024. "“We don't experiment with our patients!” An ethnographic account of the epistemic politics of (re)designing nursing work," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    5. Nugus, Peter & Greenfield, David & Travaglia, Joanne & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2012. "The politics of action research: “If you don't like the way things are going, get off the bus”," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(11), pages 1946-1953.
    6. Ludwig Kuntz & Stefan Scholtes, 2013. "Physicians in leadership: the association between medical director involvement and staff-to-patient ratios," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 129-138, June.
    7. Liberati, Elisa Giulia & Gorli, Mara & Scaratti, Giuseppe, 2016. "Invisible walls within multidisciplinary teams: Disciplinary boundaries and their effects on integrated care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 31-39.
    8. Altomonte, Guillermina, 2022. "Coordinating illness and insurance trajectories: Evidence from a post-acute care unit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    9. Macinati, Manuela S. & Bozzi, Stefano & Rizzo, Marco Giovanni, 2016. "Budgetary participation and performance: The mediating effects of medical managers’ job engagement and self-efficacy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(9), pages 1017-1028.
    10. Graeme Currie & Charlotte Croft, 2015. "Examining hybrid nurse managers as a case of identity transition in healthcare: developing a balanced research agenda," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(5), pages 855-865, October.
    11. Liberati, Elisa Giulia, 2017. "Separating, replacing, intersecting: The influence of context on the construction of the medical-nursing boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 135-143.
    12. Miner, Skye A., 2019. "Demarcating the dirty work: Canadian Fertility professionals’ use of boundary-work in contentious egg donation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 19-26.
    13. repec:ehu:cuader:49120 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Xyrichis, Andreas & Lowton, Karen & Rafferty, Anne Marie, 2017. "Accomplishing professional jurisdiction in intensive care: An ethnographic study of three units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 102-111.
    15. Wei Liu & Marie Gerdtz & Elizabeth Manias, 2016. "Creating opportunities for interdisciplinary collaboration and patient‐centred care: how nurses, doctors, pharmacists and patients use communication strategies when managing medications in an acute ho," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(19-20), pages 2943-2957, October.
    16. Miyuki Takase & Sachiko Teraoka & Yabase Kousuke, 2015. "Investigating the adequacy of the Competence‐Turnover Intention Model: how does nursing competence affect nurses’ turnover intention?," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(5-6), pages 805-816, March.
    17. Caronia, Letizia & Saglietti, Marzia & Chieregato, Arturo, 2020. "Challenging the interprofessional epistemic boundaries: The practices of informing in nurse-physician interaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    18. Bridgette Wessels & Jo Taylor & Lizzie Coates, 2017. "Telehealth in Community Nursing: A Negotiated Order," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 152-168, December.
    19. Standing, Holly & Patterson, Rebecca & Dalkin, Sonia & Exley, Catherine & Brittain, Katie, 2020. "A critical exploration of professional jurisdictions and role boundaries in inter-professional end-of-life care in the community," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    20. Tit‐Chai Tan & Huaqiong Zhou & Michelle Kelly, 2017. "Nurse–physician communication – An integrated review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 3974-3989, December.
    21. Meng, Annette & Borg, Vilhelm & Clausen, Thomas, 2019. "Enhancing the social capital in industrial workplaces: Developing workplace interventions using intervention mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 227-236.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:257-268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.