IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v26y2017i19-20p3125-3136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nurses’ comfort level with spiritual assessment: a study among nurses working in diverse healthcare settings

Author

Listed:
  • Pamela H Cone
  • Tove Giske

Abstract

Aims and objectives To gain knowledge about nurses’ comfort level in assessing spiritual matters and to learn what questions nurses use in practice related to spiritual assessment. Background Spirituality is important in holistic nursing care; however, nurses report feeling uncomfortable and ill‐prepared to address this domain with patients. Education is reported to impact nurses’ ability to engage in spiritual care. Design This cross‐sectional exploratory survey reports on a mixed‐method study examining how comfortable nurses are with spiritual assessment. Method In 2014, a 21‐item survey with 10 demographic variables and three open‐ended questions were distributed to Norwegian nurses working in diverse care settings with 172 nurse responses (72 % response rate). SPSS was used to analyse quantitative data; thematic analysis examined the open‐ended questions. Results/Findings Norwegian nurses reported a high level of comfort with most questions even though spirituality is seen as private. Nurses with some preparation or experience in spiritual care were most comfortable assessing spirituality. Statistically significant correlations were found between the nurses’ comfort level with spiritual assessment and their preparedness and sense of the importance of spiritual assessment. How well‐prepared nurses felt was related to years of experience, degree of spirituality and religiosity, and importance of spiritual assessment. Conclusion Many nurses are poorly prepared for spiritual assessment and care among patients in diverse care settings; educational preparation increases their comfort level with facilitating such care. Nurses who feel well prepared with spirituality feel more comfortable with the spiritual domain. Relevance to clinical practice By fostering a culture where patients’ spirituality is discussed and reflected upon in everyday practice and in continued education, nurses’ sense of preparedness, and thus their level of comfort, can increase. Clinical supervision and interprofessional collaboration with hospital chaplains and/or other spiritual leaders can facilitate tailor spiritual assessment of patients based on patient concerns and view of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamela H Cone & Tove Giske, 2017. "Nurses’ comfort level with spiritual assessment: a study among nurses working in diverse healthcare settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3125-3136, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3125-3136
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13660
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilfred McSherry & Steve Jamieson, 2013. "The qualitative findings from an online survey investigating nurses' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3170-3182, November.
    2. Robyn Keall & Josephine M Clayton & Phyllis Butow, 2014. "How do Australian palliative care nurses address existential and spiritual concerns? Facilitators, barriers and strategies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(21-22), pages 3197-3205, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary E. Minton & Mary J. Isaacson & Brandon Michael Varilek & Jessica L. Stadick & Shannon O'Connell‐Persaud, 2018. "A willingness to go there: Nurses and spiritual care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 173-181, January.
    2. Vivian F. da Cunha & Sandra C. Pillon & Shazia Zafar & Christopher Wagstaff & Fabio Scorsolini‐Comin, 2020. "Brazilian nurses' concept of religion, religiosity, and spirituality: A qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1161-1168, December.
    3. Suh‐Ing Hsieh & Li‐Ling Hsu & Chen‐Yi Kao & Sara Breckenridge‐Sproat & Hui‐Ling Lin & Hsiu‐Chen Tai & Tzu‐Hsin Huang & Tsung‐Lan Chu, 2020. "Factors associated with spiritual care competencies in Taiwan’s clinical nurses: A descriptive correlational study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(9-10), pages 1599-1613, May.
    4. Alina Deluga & Beata Dobrowolska & Krzysztof Jurek & Barbara Ślusarska & Grzegorz Nowicki & Alvisa Palese, 2020. "Nurses’ spiritual attitudes and involvement—Validation of the Polish version of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Holmes, Cheryl, 2018. "Stakeholder views on the role of spiritual care in Australian hospitals: An exploratory study," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(4), pages 389-395.
    6. Marcelo Borges & Giancarlo Lucchetti & Frederico C. Leão & Homero Vallada & Mario F. P. Peres, 2021. "Religious Affiliations Influence Health-Related and General Decision Making: A Brazilian Nationwide Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-9, March.
    7. Elizabeth Batstone & Cara Bailey & Nutmeg Hallett, 2020. "Spiritual care provision to end‐of‐life patients: A systematic literature review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(19-20), pages 3609-3624, October.
    8. Tove Giske & Pamela H Cone, 2015. "Discerning the healing path – how nurses assist patient spirituality in diverse health care settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(19-20), pages 2926-2935, October.
    9. Therese Connell Meehan & Fiona Timmins & Jacqueline Burke, 2018. "Fundamental care guided by the Careful Nursing Philosophy and Professional Practice Model©," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2260-2273, June.
    10. Kristina B Torskenæs & Mary H Kalfoss & Berit Sæteren, 2015. "Meaning given to spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs: explored by a sample of a Norwegian population," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3355-3364, December.
    11. Linda Rykkje & Katie Eriksson & Maj-Britt RÃ¥holm, 2015. "Love in Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    12. Elizabeth Johnston Taylor & Carla Gober-Park & Kathy Schoonover-Shoffner & Iris Mamier & Chintan K. Somaiya & Khaled Bahjri, 2019. "Nurse Religiosity and Spiritual Care: An Online Survey," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(5), pages 636-652, June.
    13. Mary R. O'Brien & Karen Kinloch & Karen E. Groves & Barbara A. Jack, 2019. "Meeting patients’ spiritual needs during end‐of‐life care: A qualitative study of nurses’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of spiritual care training," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 182-189, January.
    14. Rocío de Diego Cordero & Bárbara Badanta Romero & Filomena Adelaide de Matos & Emília Costa & Daniele Corcioli Mendes Espinha & Claudia de Souza Tomasso & Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti & Giancarl, 2018. "Opinions and attitudes on the relationship between spirituality, religiosity and health: A comparison between nursing students from Brazil and Portugal," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(13-14), pages 2804-2813, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:26:y:2017:i:19-20:p:3125-3136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.