IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v22y2013i21-22p3170-3182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The qualitative findings from an online survey investigating nurses' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care

Author

Listed:
  • Wilfred McSherry
  • Steve Jamieson

Abstract

Aims and objectives To provide an opportunity for members to express their understandings of spirituality and spiritual care. Background The role and place of spirituality within nursing have been contested by academics and wider society. One argument posited is supporting patients with their spiritual needs is not the responsibility of nurses. This is despite a clear professional requirement for nurses to achieve competence in the delivery of spiritual care. Design The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) conducted an online survey of its membership to ascertain their perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care identifying current practice. Methods This article presents the findings from the final part of the survey that asked respondents to use a free‐text facility to add comments on the subjects of spirituality and spiritual care. Results Overall, 4054 RCN members responded, of these 2327 provided additional comments. These comments were analysed using keyword and content/thematic analysis. Five broad themes emerged: (1) theoretical and conceptual understanding of spirituality, (2) fundamental aspects of nursing, (3) notion of integration and integrated care, (4) education and professional development and (5) religious belief and professional practice. Findings suggest that nurses have diverse understandings of spirituality and the majority consider spirituality to be an integral and fundamental element of the nurses' role. Conclusion Generally, nurses had a broad, inclusive understanding of spirituality considering this to be ‘universal’. There was some uncertainty and fear surrounding the boundaries between personal belief and professional practice. Respondents advocated formal integration of spirituality within programmes of nurse education. Relevance to clinical nursing The concept of spirituality and the provision of spiritual care are now recognised as fundamental aspects of the nurse's role. There is a need for greater clarity between personal and professional boundaries to enable nurses to feel more confident and competent in delivering spiritual care.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilfred McSherry & Steve Jamieson, 2013. "The qualitative findings from an online survey investigating nurses' perceptions of spirituality and spiritual care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(21-22), pages 3170-3182, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3170-3182
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12411
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.12411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristina B Torskenæs & Mary H Kalfoss & Berit Sæteren, 2015. "Meaning given to spirituality, religiousness and personal beliefs: explored by a sample of a Norwegian population," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(23-24), pages 3355-3364, December.
    2. Mary R. O'Brien & Karen Kinloch & Karen E. Groves & Barbara A. Jack, 2019. "Meeting patients’ spiritual needs during end‐of‐life care: A qualitative study of nurses’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of spiritual care training," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(1-2), pages 182-189, January.
    3. Elizabeth Johnston Taylor & Carla Gober-Park & Kathy Schoonover-Shoffner & Iris Mamier & Chintan K. Somaiya & Khaled Bahjri, 2019. "Nurse Religiosity and Spiritual Care: An Online Survey," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 28(5), pages 636-652, June.
    4. Vivian F. da Cunha & Sandra C. Pillon & Shazia Zafar & Christopher Wagstaff & Fabio Scorsolini‐Comin, 2020. "Brazilian nurses' concept of religion, religiosity, and spirituality: A qualitative descriptive study," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 1161-1168, December.
    5. Mary E. Minton & Mary J. Isaacson & Brandon Michael Varilek & Jessica L. Stadick & Shannon O'Connell‐Persaud, 2018. "A willingness to go there: Nurses and spiritual care," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 173-181, January.
    6. Linda Rykkje & Katie Eriksson & Maj-Britt RÃ¥holm, 2015. "Love in Connectedness," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(1), pages 21582440155, February.
    7. Alina Deluga & Beata Dobrowolska & Krzysztof Jurek & Barbara Ślusarska & Grzegorz Nowicki & Alvisa Palese, 2020. "Nurses’ spiritual attitudes and involvement—Validation of the Polish version of the Spiritual Attitude and Involvement List," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Marcelo Borges & Giancarlo Lucchetti & Frederico C. Leão & Homero Vallada & Mario F. P. Peres, 2021. "Religious Affiliations Influence Health-Related and General Decision Making: A Brazilian Nationwide Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-9, March.
    9. Pamela H Cone & Tove Giske, 2017. "Nurses’ comfort level with spiritual assessment: a study among nurses working in diverse healthcare settings," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(19-20), pages 3125-3136, October.
    10. Therese Connell Meehan & Fiona Timmins & Jacqueline Burke, 2018. "Fundamental care guided by the Careful Nursing Philosophy and Professional Practice Model©," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(11-12), pages 2260-2273, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:22:y:2013:i:21-22:p:3170-3182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.